1 / 20

Profit Maximization and Derived Demand

Profit Maximization and Derived Demand. A firm’s hiring of inputs is directly related to its desire to maximize profits any firm’s profits can be expressed as the difference between total revenue and total costs, each of which can be regarded as functions of the inputs used

annaryan
Télécharger la présentation

Profit Maximization and Derived Demand

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Profit Maximization and Derived Demand • A firm’s hiring of inputs is directly related to its desire to maximize profits • any firm’s profits can be expressed as the difference between total revenue and total costs, each of which can be regarded as functions of the inputs used  = TR(K,L) - TC(K,L)

  2. Profit Maximization and Derived Demand • First-order conditions for a maximum are • the firm should hire each input up to the point at which the extra revenue yielded from one more unit is equal to the extra cost

  3. Marginal Revenue Product • The marginal revenue product (MRP) from hiring an extra unit of any input is the extra revenue yielded by selling what that extra input produces MRP = MR  MP

  4. Marginal Expense • If the supply curve facing the firm for the inputs it hires are infinitely elastic at prevailing prices, the marginal expense of hiring a worker is simply this market wage • If input supply is not infinitely elastic, a firm’s hiring decision may have an effect on input prices

  5. Marginal Expense • For now, we will assume that the firm is a price taker for the inputs it buys TC/K = r TC/L = w • The first-order conditions for profit-maximization become MRPK = r MRPL = w

  6. An Alternative Derivation • Profit maximization requires that MR = MC so we have MR  MPK = MRPK = r MR  MPL = MRPL = w

  7. Price Taking in theOutput Market • If a firm exhibits price-taking behavior in its output market, MR = P • This means that at the profit-maximizing levels of each input P  MPK = r P  MPL = w • sometimes P multiplied by an input’s MP is called the value of marginal product

  8. Comparative Statics ofInput Demand • We will focus on the comparative statics of the demand for labor • the analysis for capital would be symmetric • For the most part, we will assume price-taking behavior for the firm in its output market

  9. Single-Input Demand • Suppose that the number of truffles harvested in a particular forest is • Assuming that truffles sell for $50 per pound, total revenue for the owner is

  10. Single-Input Demand • Marginal revenue product is given by • If truffle searchers’ wages are $500, the owner will determine the optimal amount of L to hire by

  11. Competitive Determination of Income Shares • If the firm is profit-maximizing, each input will be hired to the point where its MRP is equal to its price • Thus,

  12. Monopsony in theLabor Market • In many situations, the supply curve for an input (L) is not perfectly elastic • We will examine the polar case of monopsony, where the firm is the single buyer of the input in question • the firm faces the entire market supply curve • to increase its hiring of labor, the firm must pay a higher wage

  13. Monopsony in theLabor Market • The marginal expense of hiring an extra unit of labor (MEL) exceeds the wage • If the total cost of labor is wL, then • In the competitive case, w/L = 0 and MEL = w • If w/L > 0, MEL > w

  14. The firm will set MEL = MRPL to determine its profit-maximizing level of labor (L1) The wage is determined by the supply curve w1 L1 Monopsony in theLabor Market Wage ME S D Labor

  15. Note that the quantity of labor demanded by this firm falls short of the level that would be hired in a competitive labor market (L*) The wage paid by the firm will also be lower than the competitive level (w*) w* L* Monopsony in theLabor Market Wage ME S w1 D Labor L1

  16. Monopsonistic Hiring • Suppose that a coal mine’s workers can dig 2 tons per hour and coal sells for $10 per ton • this implies that MRPL = $20 per hour • If the coal mine is the only hirer of miners in the local area, it faces a labor supply curve of the form L = 50w

  17. Monopsonistic Hiring • The firm’s wage bill is wL = L2/50 • The marginal expense associated with hiring miners is MEL = wL/L = L/25 • Setting MEL = MRPL, we find that the optimal quantity of labor is 500 and the optimal wage is $10

  18. Monopoly in theSupply of Inputs • Imperfect competition may also occur in input markets if suppliers are able to form a monopoly • labor unions in “closed shop” industries • production cartels for certain types of capital equipment • firms (or countries) that control unique supplies of natural resources

  19. Monopoly in theSupply of Inputs • If both the supply and demand sides of an input market are monopolized, the market outcome will be indeterminate • the actual outcome will depend on the bargaining skills of the parties

  20. The monopoly seller would prefer a wage of w1 with L1 workers hired w1 The monopsony buyer would prefer a wage of w2 with L2 workers hired w2 L1 L2 Monopoly in theSupply of Inputs Wage ME S D MR Labor

More Related