1 / 14

Testing the foundations

Testing the foundations. Marie Hanlon & Simon Gooch (Loughborough College). Introduction. Outline + general purpose statement … Explore what kinds of reading/listening test items would be most suitable for foundation. The Foundation Course (4’). Nationalities, age etc.

Télécharger la présentation

Testing the foundations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Testing the foundations Marie Hanlon & Simon Gooch (Loughborough College)

  2. Introduction • Outline • + general purpose statement … • Explore what kinds of reading/listening test items would be most suitable for foundation

  3. The Foundation Course (4’) • Nationalities, age etc. • The Foundation Course (modules, subjects etc.)

  4. Constraints • Specific, non-integrated • General, not subject/discipline specific • Non-IELTS • Input factual/information-based + limited by Flesch Reading Ease Scale • External examiner comments (thank you!) • 4 weeks!

  5. Data collection analysis Practice test (but not a true pilot) 2 basic data analysis measures: • Facility Index (FI) – measures item difficulty (1 = too easy / 0 = impossible! Ideally FI of .5) • Discrimination Index (DI) – how well item discriminates (difference between FI of top/bottom bands). DI 0.3, needs replacing. • Both these used with individual items, but (Fulcher, 2010) suggests can be used to measure performance of certain sections and/or same question types – we have tried this

  6. Reading test (7’) • Specifications (hand out) • Brief make up of test/questions/tasks • Analyse some question types/sections and see how successful they are – try to relate to Foundation students generally?

  7. Listening Test (1) • Specifications (hand out) • Overview of test inputs and task types • Brief overview of results • Analyse 2 sections using FI and DI

  8. Listening Test (2) • Overview of test inputs and task types: • 3 sections: • Section 1 • Short extracts – space for notes, short answers (1-4 words) – overall/general meaning

  9. Listening Test (3) Section 2 • Short lecture style – Ppt slides with main information, short answers (usually specific data) – intensive/detail Section 3 • Short lecture style – Listen first, make own notes. Hand out given, SS use notes to complete the diagram/answer questions – note taking skills

  10. Listening Test (4) Brief overview of results: • Total marks – 35 No. of students - 30 • Mean score – 15.9 • Mode – 17 • Median – 17 • Range – 24 • (40% score to pass - success rate 63%)

  11. Listening Test (5) Section 2 • FI – range for section .06 to .8 • mean for whole section .41 • DI – range for section .2 – 1 (!) • mean for whole section .55

  12. Listening Test (6) Section 3 (focus on diagram element only) • FI – range for section .1 to .73 • mean for whole section .43 • DI – range for section .2 – .7 • mean for whole section .48

  13. Conclusions • Limited sample – be careful • Statistical methods quite crude (– use of means over a section can hide variations?) • However, results suggest that these test task types seem to be appropriate and reasonably effective for testing Foundation SS academic reading and listening skills.

  14. References Fulcher Alderson, Clapham

More Related