1 / 12

‘A cornerstone for beginning a life free from crime’ (Shelter 2010:1)

Housing ex-prisoners and reducing re-offending in the UK: the role of non-governmental organisations Dr Alice Mills University of Auckland, New Zealand Associate Fellow, Third Sector Research Centre, UK. ‘A cornerstone for beginning a life free from crime’ (Shelter 2010:1).

aoife
Télécharger la présentation

‘A cornerstone for beginning a life free from crime’ (Shelter 2010:1)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Housing ex-prisoners and reducing re-offending in the UK: the role of non-governmental organisationsDr Alice Mills University of Auckland, New ZealandAssociate Fellow, Third Sector Research Centre, UK

  2. ‘A cornerstone for beginning a life free from crime’ (Shelter 2010:1)

  3. Housing problems amongst prisoners • About a third lose their housing on imprisonment • Around 35% have nowhere to stay on release • Nearly 70% are in ‘permanent’ accommodation prior to incarceration (Social Exclusion Unit 2002)

  4. NGOs in housing • 4,525 NGOs work with (ex) offenders in the field of accommodation (Gojkovic et al. 2011) • General advice and advocacy • Housing provision and support services • Temporary accommodation • Social Impact Bonds – payment by results

  5. Securing housing in England and Wales • Have to: • Be in priority need e.g. vulnerable due to time spent in prison • Unintentionally homeless • Have a local connection to area they wish to live • Not be found guilty of ‘unacceptable behaviour’ (Homelessness Act 2002) • ‘unfair and restrictive allocations policies’ (Shelter 2006:16) • Difficulties obtaining private accommodation

  6. Aims and method • To examine the role of NGOs to assisting ex-prisoners to keep/secure accommodation • Rhetoric of partnership • Part of a two-year project on NGOs in criminal justice • 8 prisons • Prisoner surveys (n=680) and qualitative interviews (n=254)

  7. Prisoner surveys • 37 housing NGOs • 21% prisoners had heard of at least one • 4% had used them • 10% identified lack of NGOs specialising in housing as key area for improvement

  8. A positive move • In 2001, I was sent to prison for 12 months, I got out, my flat had been given away and I was straight homeless. Nowadays you get emergency shelter and housing when you get out, they put you in a bedsit… There are agencies out there and now they’re starting to filter through into the prison system. [Prisoner, prison 3]

  9. Barriers to effective service provision • High demand • (Ex) offenders not accepted as ‘priority need’ • Lack of suitable accommodation • You can refer somebody to loads of different places, but if they’re not in priority need with the council, they can’t accommodate them. Even if they are, you can refer them to five or six hostels and if there’s no beds available…, that person will still leave prison homeless. [NGO representative, prison 6]

  10. Partnership working • Local homelessness strategies • Dissuading high-risk offenders from reintegrating in their area • Crime control over housing need and reintegration (Harding and Harding 2006)

  11. Preventing the ‘revolving door’ We get so many here that are just in and out of prison constantly... Mainly because they’ve got mental health issues, drug issues, alcohol issues... because they’ve been round the system so many times, they’re now excluded from so many housing projects because of their behaviour or because they haven’t engaged with staff... Every time they’ve come back in, their options are limited further. [NGO representative, prison 3]

  12. Conclusion • ‘one of the most important, yet most intractable, problems in the whole resettlement agenda’ (Maguire et al., 2007: 167). • Fundamental conflict between reintegration and housing policies • Welfare reform and spending cuts • Partnerships with the private sector

More Related