1 / 10

UNCERTAINTY

Confidence and Effective Demand in Keynes’ Economics. UNCERTAINTY. Rush to liquidity in a crisis only reduces prices of securities  i U P. “Quasi – rents” Yields/Profits. Interest Rate. Price of Capital Asset, P k. (What it’s worth). vs. Price of Investment, P I.

arden
Télécharger la présentation

UNCERTAINTY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Confidence and Effective Demand in Keynes’ Economics UNCERTAINTY Rush to liquidity in a crisis only reduces prices of securities  iUP “Quasi – rents” Yields/Profits Interest Rate Price of Capital Asset, Pk (What it’s worth) vs. Price of Investment, PI (What it costs to build) Investment Spending Multiplier Effective Demand, Output and Employment

  2. Stabilizing an Unstable Economy • Financial Instability Hypothesis: • Hedge finance • Speculative finance • Ponzi finance Two types of risk affect the volume of investment. …The first is the entrepreneur's or borrower's risk and arises out of doubts in his own mind as to the probability of his actually earning the prospective yield for which he hopes. If a man is venturing his own money, this is the only risk which is relevant. …But where a system of borrowing and lending exists, a second type of risk is relevant which we may call the lender's risk. GT, Chapter 11. Hyman Minsky 1919 - 1996 Student of Simons/ Schumpeter • A Minsky Cycle • Displacement (invention, easy money) • Boom…successful speculation • Euphoria…financial innovation • Profit taking • Panic PK Borrower’s Risk Price of capital assets Lender’s Risk PI Internal funds Io I1 Investment When expectations are disappointed, investment collapses … but debts remain

  3. Mehrling on Minsky • How to infer financial conditions: • Speculative financing requires periodic refinance So Increased financial fragility  Increased difficulty rolling over loans  Increased demand for bank loans…But banks finance “speculatively”  Problems of bank refinancing • Evolution of financial fragility: Post WWII: Treasury bills  refinancing “automatic” Banks reduced T-bill held  Money market financing • But Fed not responsible for money market • Fed policy of “brinksmanship”  lender of last resort only in crisis • Increased volatility of short-term rates Higher s-t rates  refinancing by pledging ever greater future cash amounts. So refinance increases fragility rather than restores robustness. Natural thrust toward fragility is amplified, not dampened, by financial system. Refinance becomes impossible for some overextended units  crisis erupts. They default  efforts of others to refinance upset. OR they attempt to “make position by selling position”  fire sale Undermine collateral support for the existing debt structure.

  4. Mehrling on Minsky • Periods of tight liquidity  short rates rise (incentive for stretching liquidity) • Value of today’s cash flows rises relative to cash flows in the future. • Demand price of capital assets (Pk) falls • Supply price of investment goods (Pi) rises (interest is a cost of production). • The incentive to invest is reduced. • The greater danger: • collapse of investment spending • reduced aggregate income • cash flows elsewhere in the economy fall short of expected levels • hedge finance units  speculative units • speculative units  Ponzi units, • the fragility of the system increases. • An investment slump might amplify the financial problems of a few units and bring the whole system down in a cascade of debt deflation.

  5. Macroeconomics: Keynes’ Legacy Left Right State Market Intervene Laissez-faire P O L I C Y Keynes Friedman Samuelson Brunner Meltzer Modigliani Tobin Klein Taylor Bernanke Shiller F U N A M E N T A L S M o d e r n P r o g r a m Hicks Samuelson Saltwater Freshwater Fischer Blanchard Lucas Sargent Prescott

  6. Let those who will write the nation’s laws – if I can write the its textbooks. Economists have correctly predicted nine of the last five recessions. Investing should be more like watching paint dry or watching grass grow. If you want excitement, take $800 and go to Las Vegas. In this age of specialization, I sometimes think of myself as the last generalist in economics Funeral by funeral, theory advances. BA, Chicago, 1935 PhD, Harvard, 1941 Foundations of Economic Analysis, published 1947 M.I.T. 1940 – 2009 Radiation Lab Economics text 1st edition, 1948 17th edition, 2007 Clark Medal 1947 Nobel Memorial Prize, 1970 Paul Samuelson, 1915 - 2009

  7. Paul Samuelson, Notable Concepts Mathematical economics: constrained optimization • Revealed preference • Factor price equalization • The transfer problem: improved on Hume • Economics of public goods • Turnpike theorem for growth • Overlapping generations framework • Randomness of speculative prices  efficient market hypothesis • The U.S. Phillips Curve (with Solow)  a policy menu? • 1964 Kennedy – Johnson Tax Cut • 1968 Vietnam War Surtax • “…Adam Smith gave two resounding cheers for individualism; but for state interference of the pre-19th century type he could muster only a bronx cheer. Make no mistake about it, Smith was right. Most inter-ventions into economic life by the State were then harmful both to prosperity and freedom…Good inten-tions by government are not enough; acts do have consequences that had better be taken into account…”

  8. Keynesian Pantheon Alvin Hansen 1887 - 1975 • “The American Keynes” • Economic Policy and Full Employment, 1946 • A Guide to Keynes, 1953 Simon Kuznets 1901 – 1985 Nobel Memorial Prize, 1971 • National Income and Its Composition: 1919-1938, • 1941. • Ragnar Frisch, 1895 – 1973 • Econometrics, “Macroeconomics” • Nobel Memorial Prize, 1969 • Jan Tinbergen, 1903 – 1994 • First econometric model • Nobel Memorial Prize, 1969 John Hicks 1904 – 1989 Nobel Memorial Prize, 1972 Mr. Keynes and the Classics, A Suggested Interpretation, Econometrica, 1937.

  9. Keynesian Pantheon • A Textbook of Econometrics, 1953 • The Empirical Foundations of Keynesian • Economics, 1954 • An Econometric Model of the United States: • 1929 – 1952, 1955 • An Introduction to Econometrics, 1962 Lawrence Klein 1920 – Clark Medal, 1959 Nobel Memorial Prize, 1980 James Tobin 1918 – 2002 Clark Medal, 1955 Council of Economic Advisors, 1961-2 Nobel Memorial Prize, 1981 • Liquidity Preference as Behavior Towards • Risk, Review of Economic Studies, 1958 • Tobin q / Tobin tax • Walter Heller, 1915 – 1987 • Chair, Council of Economic Advisors, 1961 - 1964 Franco Modigliani 1918 – 2003 Nobel Memorial Prize, 1985 • Liquidity Preference in the Theory of Interest • and Money, Econometrica, 1944 • The Life Cycle Hypothesis of Saving, AER,1963 • MPS: MIT-Penn-System Model

  10. Keynesian Pantheon Robert Solow, 1924 – Clark Medal, 1961 Council of Economic Advisors, 1961-2 Nobel Memorial Prize, 1987 • A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth, • QJE, 1956 • Analytical Aspects of Anti-Inflation Policy (with • Samuelson), 1960 A.W. Phillips, 1914 – 1975 Paul H. Douglas, 1892 – 1976 “…the greatest of all Senators” Martin Luther King U.S. Senator (Illinois), 1949 - 1967 Chair, Joint Economic Committee • A Theory of Production (with Cobb), AER, 1928 • Real Wages in the United States, 1930 • The Theory of Wages, 1934

More Related