160 likes | 293 Vues
This presentation highlights innovative research on binary and variable stars using microtelescopes. Initially, the evolution of telescope technology is traced from Galileo to modern CCDs, emphasizing the importance of observing bright stars for long-term variability studies. The need for an increase in photometric measurements among amateurs and small observatories is highlighted, along with the potential of micro/nanotelescopes to democratize astronomy. Examples of successful observations using small telescopes showcase their efficacy and potential to yield unique data in stellar studies.
E N D
Binary starresearchusing „microtelescopes“ Miloslav Zejda, Zdeněk Mikulášek, Jiří Liška Masaryk University Brno, Czech Republic Petr Svoboda privateobservatory, Brno, Czech Republic KOLOS 2011, Kolonica, December 1, 2011
firsttelescopes – diameteronlyseveral cm! • Galileo & Castelli: • discoveriesofbinariesormultiplesystems: • Mizar(1616), • J1Orionis – Trapez(1617) • bScorpii …
Variablestarsobservations(in modernhistorysince 1596) • Means: • nakedeye – limits – 6-7 mag, • telescope + eye – 1844 Argelander • telescope + photography – 1881 Draper – 14.7 mag • telescope + photoelectricphotometer • 1892 Monck, 1907 Stebinns • 1946 Kron, early 50‘s Johnson & Morgan UBV • telescope + CCD – 1979 – KittPeak NO
Silicon age • spread of objective measurements among many observatories and amateur astronomers • increasing number of photometric measurements • observing of fainter and fainter objects • HOWEVER • stars brighter than6 mag are too bright • => lack of observations of bright stars!
Do we need observations of bright stars? yes, indeed! Why? • variability of bright stars is usually known for a long time => unique possibility to study long-term variations • usage of different methods except photometry
objections? surveys – ASAS… - monochromatic, unsatisfactorytimeresolution spacemissions – Hipparcos – good, but old, timeresolution Kepler, COROT – excellentjobs, but … GAIA – bright limit 6 mag nano-satellite – BRITE project
solution? • return to Galileo‘ssizetelescopes • => usageofmicro/nanotelescopes • „windows astronomy“ • „balcony astronomy“ • breakdowntheprejudices • suitable for amateursand small observatories • Advantages: • cheapacquisition • cheap and efficientpractise • excellent opportunity to obtain unique • long sets of observations • possibilityforstudents and travellers
suggestions? • to equiptheobserverswith a kit (CCD, photometricfilters, nanotelescope) • tellthemwhat and howtheyshouldobserve (targets, filters, timeresolutions…) • establish a network ofobservers – seeforanexample http://var.astro.cz
NO Pup Minima timingsofeclipsingbinaries P. Svoboda; 0.035m refractor CCD SBIG ST7 filterI J. Liška: RF 0.04m + CCD ATIK 16Ic Phe DI = 0.15 mag TW Dra
Lightcurves J. Liška: 0.04m refractor + CCD G2-0402 SAAO 0,5m + single-channel PEP MJUO 0,6m + single-channel PEP L. C. Watson, J. D. Pritchard, J. B. Hearnshaw,P P. M. Kilmartin and A. C. Gilmore:MNRAS 325, 143–150 (2001)
P. Svoboda; 0.035m refractor, CCD SBIG ST7 HD 1438 (And) amplitudeDV≈ 0.02 mag
Thank you for your attention! In thepresentationweusedobservations and materialsfrom: VSES archive NYX archive personalarchivesofauthors MNRAS 325, 143–150 (2001) NASA ADS servise webpages: http://ccd.mii.cz http://var.astro.cz http://www.astronomie2009.cz http://en.wikipedia.org and others Your notes are welcome! zejda@physics.muni.cz