1 / 1

Fasting HDL (mg/dL) Fasting LDL (mg/dL) Fasting TG (mg/dL)

Fasting Insulin (mU/L) Fasting Glucose (mg/dL) Study N WMD (95% CI) WMD (95% CI). Rosiglitazone vs. Metformin Mulligan 53 van Wijk/Coll 31 Tomazic 60 Overall 144. -1.02 (-3.99, 1.94). 1.09 (-2.48, 4.65).

aristotle-richardson
Télécharger la présentation

Fasting HDL (mg/dL) Fasting LDL (mg/dL) Fasting TG (mg/dL)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fasting Insulin (mU/L) Fasting Glucose (mg/dL) Study N WMD (95% CI) WMD (95% CI) Rosiglitazone vs. Metformin Mulligan 53 van Wijk/Coll 31 Tomazic 60 Overall 144 -1.02 (-3.99, 1.94) 1.09 (-2.48, 4.65) Favors Metforminp=0.55 Favors Rosiglitazone p=0.50 Fasting HDL (mg/dL) Fasting LDL (mg/dL) Fasting TG (mg/dL) Study N WMD (95% CI) WMD (95% CI) WMD (95% CI) Rosiglitazone vs. Metformin Mulligan 53 van Wijk/Coll 31 Tomazic 60 Overall 144 -6.94 (-9.50, -4.37) 7.38 (-4.17, 18.93) 45.05 (-10.50, 100.6) Favors Metforminp<0.001 Favors Metforminp=0.21 Favors Metforminp=0.11 Body Mass Index (kg/m2) Waist to Hip Ratio Visceral Abdominal Fat (cm2) Study N WMD (95% CI) WMD (95% CI) WMD (95% CI) Rosiglitazone vs. Metformin Mulligan 53 van Wijk/Coll 31 Tomazic 60 Overall 144 0.80 (0.47, 1.14) 0.03 (0.01, 0.05) 9.88 (-12.55, 32.32), * Favors Metforminp<0.001 Favors Metformin p=0.01 Favors Metformin p=0.39 WMD=weighted mean difference (based on change from baseline for each group), calculated using random effects models * Test for heterogeneity p=0.06; ***only two studies so source of heterogeneity could not be determined

More Related