1 / 14

Modeling and Evaluating Best Management Practices in Austin, TX

Modeling and Evaluating Best Management Practices in Austin, TX. Presented by Lauren Schneider Environmental and Water Resources Engineering November 30, 2004. BMP Background. Used for storm water management Need for small, on-site systems Effectiveness Groundwater Recharge

arlene
Télécharger la présentation

Modeling and Evaluating Best Management Practices in Austin, TX

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Modeling and Evaluating Best Management Practices in Austin, TX Presented by Lauren Schneider Environmental and Water Resources Engineering November 30, 2004

  2. BMP Background • Used for storm water management • Need for small, on-site systems • Effectiveness • Groundwater Recharge • Peak Flow Reduction • Pollution and Sediment Reduction • Examples • Vegetated Buffer Strips • Porous Pavements • Cisterns http://rainbarrelguide.com/ CA Stormwater BMP Handbook Federal Highway Administration

  3. Bioretention (Rain Garden) Dr. Moglen, University of Maryland

  4. Inflow from Ac S W Ho Lb nl Hb Trench Box (crushed stone) L My Past Research • Goal: Determine storms needed to verify a BMP model • Infiltration trench model based on continuity • Indicators of effectiveness • Rp ~ 50% • Et ~ 75% • Rv ~ 70%

  5. Goal and Objectives • Problem: Effectiveness of implemented BMPs is unknown • Long-Term Goal: Using a verified model, evaluate the effectiveness of current and future BMPsinstalled in Austin. • Objectives • Develop and verify a model • Use GIS to determine drainage area characteristics • Develop a process for GIS inputs to model • Determine ineffective BMPs for study

  6. Necessary Data • Soil Type (Statsgo) • BMP data for Austin (Ellen Wadsworth of the city of Austin • 10-m DEM (USGS) • Land Use (USGS)

  7. Terrain Processing Create Subwatersheds Process

  8. Clip Land Use to Subwatersheds Determine Soil Type in Each Subwatershed Process

  9. Calculate Overall CN Per Subwatershed Process Source for CN: R.H. McCuen, Hydrologic Analysis and Design

  10. Inputs from GIS to Model • Drainage Area

  11. Inputs from GIS to Model • Slope • SCS Curve Number (CN) • Rainfall data for Austin

  12. Example of Results • One BMP (ID 5) was examined • Two variables were varied • Drainage Area (1.95 to 4.13 acres) • CN (94 to 85) • One example: Et

  13. Conclusions and Future Work • Conclusions • Developed a possible process • Drainage Area and CN are significant • Drainage Area can vary greatly • Future Work • Verify the model • Obtain more information about installed BMPs • Use better data for terrain processing • Determine best process for drainage area

  14. Acknowledgements • Dr. Maidment • Ellen Wadsworth • Christine Dartiguenave

More Related