1 / 19

LoCo Update GLASS Panel Meeting KNMI, De Bilt, NL June 24, 2008

LoCo Update GLASS Panel Meeting KNMI, De Bilt, NL June 24, 2008. Christa Peters-Lidard Joseph Santanello, Jr. Bart van den Hurk. LoCo. GSWP. 2 x 2 Matrix: Spatial scale vs. Land-atmosphere coupling strategy. LoCo. GSWP. Science questions. TOA Radiation. S ingle C olumn M odel.

arnie
Télécharger la présentation

LoCo Update GLASS Panel Meeting KNMI, De Bilt, NL June 24, 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LoCo UpdateGLASS Panel MeetingKNMI, De Bilt, NLJune 24, 2008 Christa Peters-Lidard Joseph Santanello, Jr. Bart van den Hurk

  2. LoCo GSWP 2 x 2 Matrix: Spatial scale vs. Land-atmosphere coupling strategy

  3. LoCo GSWP

  4. Science questions TOA Radiation Single Column Model Horizontal Flux Divergence Land Surface Model (www.arm.gov) A Single Column Model Christa Peters-Lidard and Bart vd Hurk • How are the results of PILPS, GSWP, or data assimilation experiments affected by the lack of land surface-atmosphere coupling? • Can we explain the physical mechanisms leading to the coupling strength differences found in GLACE or other coupled NWP/climate experiments? • Is there an observable diagnostic that quantifies the role of local land-atmosphere coupling?

  5. The Local Coupled (LoCo) Action • What’s the problem? • Problem of Land-Atmosphere Coupling is difficult to conceptualize • Very site/model/climate specific • Complex infrastructure required • Difficult to define clean experiments with well defined BC’s • Communities of LSS’s and PBL’s are rather poorly mixed • Participants need to be familiar with relatively wide range of physics themes and code departments • Related issues have iterated already 20+ years (e.g. stable boundary layer parameterization)

  6. LoCo Design per Joint GLASS/GABLS Workshop Christa Peters-Lidard and Bart vd Hurk • September 2005

  7. LoCo Status Christa Peters-Lidard and Bart vd Hurk • Bottom up approach NL PhD project: land-atmosphere interaction contribution to dry European summer cond’s status: ???

  8. LoCo Status Christa Peters-Lidard and Bart vd Hurk • Bottom up approach US NASA Energy and Water Cycle Study (NEWS)-funded project—LIS coupled to WRF PBL schemes Status: Proposed diagnostics based on two ongoing case studies—GABLS+IHOP

  9. LSM Initial Conditions Land Information System (LIS)-Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) Infrastructure for LoCo Uncoupled or Analysis Mode Coupled or Forecast Mode Station Data WRF Global, Regional Forecasts and (Re-)Analyses ESMF MYJ, YSU, MRF PBL Schemes LSM Physics (Noah, CLM2, TESSEL) ( TBD: CLM3, Catchment, VIC, HySSiB) Satellite Products Kumar, Peters-Lidard et al, EMS, 2006.

  10. LoCo Observational Diagnostics1. Mixing Diagrams • = YSU • = MYJ • = MRF bent bent Cp∙q J/kg Cp∙q J/kg bsfc bsfc Ale Ah Ale Ah L∙q (J/kg) L∙q (J/kg) Christa Peters-Lidard and Joseph Santanello, Jr.

  11. LoCo Observational Diagnostics2. EF vs. PBL Height ● ○ ● YSU MYJ MRF ○ = Noah ● = CLM2 ○ Dry ● ○ YSU MYJ MRF x x x ● ● ○ ○ ● ● • = 5-lay ■ = RUC x = Noah □ = OBS ● ○ ○ ● ● ○ ○ Intermediate Wet Christa Peters-Lidard and Joseph Santanello, Jr.

  12. LoCo Observational Diagnostics3. LE vs. H (LoCo plot) LoCo Christa Peters-Lidard and Joseph Santanello, Jr.

  13. Recent LoCo Case Study: CABAUW (Joint w/KNMI) • = YSU • = MYJ • = MRF bent bsfc Ale Ah bent • = YSU • = MYJ • = MRF bsfc Ale Ah Joseph Santanello, Jr., Bart vd Hurk, Christa Peters-Lidard

  14. Recent LoCo Case Study: CABAUW (Joint w/KNMI) Joseph Santanello, Jr., Bart vd Hurk, Christa Peters-Lidard

  15. LoCo Needs: Integration w/GABLSLIS/WRF vs. GABLS 1999 Christa Peters-Lidard and Joseph Santanello, Jr. Christa Peters-Lidard and Joseph Santanello, Jr.

  16. Latest De Bilt Workshop jointly with GABLS (sep 2005) Excellent surface temperature due to very high resolution soil model Christa Peters-Lidard and Bart vd Hurk • Bottom up approach GABLS CASES-99 study on stable BL’s status: NL group published paper exploring role of land surface model

  17. Latest De Bilt Workshop jointly with GABLS (sep 2005) Cabauw values/times Christa Peters-Lidard and Bart vd Hurk • Bottom up approach dRH/dt New case study at Cabauw, following Ek & Holtslag’s diagnostics status: to initialize (by KNMI?)

  18. Land models for LoCo • Noah • CLM2/3? • Catchment • SSIB • H-TESSEL` • Others??

  19. Potential LoCo Participants • NCEP (Noah, MYJ) • NCAR (CLM2/3?, CAM BL scheme?) • GMAO (Catchment, GEOS-5 BL scheme?) • COLA (SSIB, bl scheme?) • KNMI/ECMWF (H-TESSEL, bl scheme?) • Others??

More Related