SlideServe
Télécharger Obtenir Pro
Menu
Accueil Pro
Préférences
ApparenceLight Aide et commentaires
© SlideServe · v2026

ESPON Seminar Liège, Belgium 17-11-2010

arnulfod avatar
arnulfod
18 diapositives · 206 Views · Dec 20, 2019

Explore the positioning, governance, and potential of CBPMRs from a multidimensional approach, focusing on new regions and metropolitan accessibility. Discover key political conclusions and barriers to enhanced cross-border cooperation.

#espon seminar liège, belgium 17-11-2010 #espon seminar liège, belgium 17-11-2010 ppt #powerpoint #presentation
ESPON Seminar Liège, Belgium 17-11-2010 - slide 1
1 / 18

Télécharger la présentation

ESPON Seminar Liège, Belgium 17-11-2010
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. ESPON Seminar Liège, Belgium 17-11-2010 METROBORDER Cross-border polycentric metropolitan regions Tobias Chilla, University of Luxembourg, on behalf of the TPG

  2. The METROBORDER project ESPON programme CU Coordination Unit MC Monitoring Committee Stakeholder Researcher

  3. The METROBORDER project • ‚Cross-Border Polycentric Metropolitan Regions‘ (CBPMR): • Where are they? • What is their position? • How can their governance be improved? • ...

  4. 1. New regions? FUAs and MUAs within the two case study regions

  5. 1. New regions? The spatial setting: The Functional Urban Areas (FUAs) of the cross-border polycentric metropolitan regions (CBPMRs)

  6. 1. New regions? right: core spaces for increased cross-border cooperation in the case study region – results from a Delphi study, differentiated for the national backgrounds of the responding experts left: cross-border institutions and their perimeter within the Upper Rhine region

  7. 2. Metropolitan regions? CBPMR-cities in the GaWC-monitor (marked in red) each square indicates a metropolis, and its position roughly represents the position on the world map (source: GaWC 2008; own graphic). VI = Vienna: alpha city (in 4th of ten world city categories) GN = Geneva: beta city (6/10) CP = Copenhagen: beta city (6/10) LX = Luxembourg: beta city (6/10) BV = Bratislava: gamma-plus city (8/10) (Basel and Strasbourg are mentioned as showing “sufficiency” but are not included in this map)

  8. 2. Metropolitan regions? • Economic control in CBPMRs – applying the FOCI approach: • diversity of cases • polycentric structure • asymmetric metropolitan quality in all cases

  9. 2. Metropolitan regions? Metropolitan accessibility? Number of flights per day and airport for the two case study regions and their surrounding areas

  10. 3. cross-border regions ? Fig. 3 (p. 38): Cross-border commuters in metropolitan areas, 2000 and 2006 (sources and spatial units: see appendix, chapter 9)

  11. 3. cross-border regions ? • Commuting flows in the Upper Rhine • Commuting... • ... is an overall domestic phenomenon • ... can override border effects, but does not always do.

  12. 3. cross-border regions ? • Economy: the example of the automotive industry in the Greater Region • relatively even distribution of economic activities in this sector in all subregions • hardly cross-border cooperation on regional level • mostely due to lack of information) (postal survey 2009/10, University of the Saarland; n=75)

  13. 4. Political conclusions? What role for the EU? Results from the Delphi study (n GR= 156, n UR =89)

  14. 4. Political conclusions? • Institutional Mapping of CBPMRs • x-axis: institutional level • y-axis: geographical scope (CEPS/ Instead 2010)

  15. 4. Political conclusions? The five most important barriers for an enhanced cross-border cooperation in both case study regions (Delphi study)

  16. 4. Political conclusions? The most relevant policies for increased cross-border cooperation (Delphi Study)

  17. Bruxelles 4. Political conclusions? Lille Aachen-Liège-Maastricht B D Rhein/ Main L Functional Urban Areas Lux. Lux. Core FUA Trier Arlon Neighbouring FUA Kaiserslautern Thionville Surrounding FUA Metz F Saarbrücken Main Institutional focus CBPMR Central CBPMR Cities Nancy NeighbouringCBPMRs Neighbouring domestic metropolises Strasbourg Metropolitan Corridors

  18. ESPON Seminar Liège, Belgium 17-11-2010 METROBORDER Cross-border polycentric metropolitan regions Tobias Chilla, University of Luxembourg, on behalf of the TPG