1 / 1

Treatment Plots Plot conditions for treatments studied at time of sampling.

Effects of organic matter removal and competing vegetation control on soil C in a Pacific Northwest D ouglas -fir plantation. Erika Knight 1,4 , Paul Footen 1 , Robert Harrison 1 , Thomas Terry 2 , and Scott Holub 3

arvin
Télécharger la présentation

Treatment Plots Plot conditions for treatments studied at time of sampling.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Effects of organic matter removal and competing vegetation control on soil C in a Pacific NorthwestDouglas-fir plantation Erika Knight1,4, Paul Footen1, Robert Harrison1, Thomas Terry2, and Scott Holub3 (1) School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; now Shannon and Wilson, Inc. Anchorage, AK (2) Weyerhaeuser Corporation (retired) and USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Olympia, WA (3) Weyerhaeuser Co., Springfield, OR Fall River LTSP • Methods • Each plot was divided into 1.0 m2 subplots. Six subplots were randomly chosen for measurement. • Three forest floor samples and three mineral soil cores were composited per subplot. • Samples were dried, sieved (4.75mm), and analyzed to obtain %C, pH, LOI, bulk density, and C content. • Objective • Assess the effects of organic matter removal and vegetation control on soil C for a 12 year old Douglas-fir plantation in western Washington, comparing: • bole-only versus total tree plus harvest (BO+VC vs. TTP+VC) • bole-only harvest with and without vegetation control (BO+VC vs.BO-VC) Soil sampling depths: • Forest floor • 0-15 cm • 15-30 cm • 30-45 cm • 45-60 cm • 60-100 cm C content to 20 cm was 7.5 Mg/ha greater for BO+VC than for TTP+VC C content to 20 cm was 1.4 Mg/ha greater for BO+VC than for BO-VC C content to 100 cm was 18 Mg/ha greater for BO+VC than for TTP+VC C content to 100 cm was 16 Mg/ha greater for BO+VC than for BO-VC Soil characteristics: • Boistfort series • Formed from weathered basalt, some volcanic ash • Deep and well-drained • Silt loam to silty clay loam texture, few stones • High organic matter content • Low bulk density Forest floor sampling in a TTP+VC plot. Fall River plot layout; stars indicate plots sampled. Modified from Ares et al., 2007. Study Site Fall River Long-term Soil Productivity (LTSP) site:: • Randomized block design • Installed and base levels of C established in 1999 • Mixed Douglas-fir and western hemlock prior to harvest • 10-15% slopes • Age 12 Douglas-fir plantation at time of sampling Paul Footen drives the soil corer into one of the three composite sample locations withina TTP+VC subplot. Results Vegetation Control BO+VC vs.BO-VC Harvest Intensity BO+VC vs. TTP+VC Total Tree Plus with vegetation control TTP+VC Bole-only with vegetation control BO+VC Bole-only without vegetation control BO-VC Forest floor C content decreased and mineral soil C increased from the initial post-harvest sampling to 2012. • Conclusions • No significant difference in total soil C content between treatments (α=0.10). • Numerical treatment differences in the carbon content we observed primarily below 20 cm. • No loss in C storage from post-harvest to 2012, but there was a loss of forest floor C and gain of mineral soil C. Treatment Plots Plot conditions for treatments studied at time of sampling. Cumulative C content to 100 cm was 16 Mg/ha greater in the BO+VC harvest than BO-VC. This difference was not statistically significant (α=0.10). Cumulative C content to 100 cm was 18 Mg/ha greater in the BO+VC harvest than TTP+VC. This difference was not statistically significant (α=0.10). Fall River Long-term Soil Productivity site, spring 2012

More Related