1 / 23

Overview

1. Overview. Background Introduction to IntelliDrive SM Preliminary Research/Proof of Concept Potential Applications Safety Mobility Commercial The Future of IntelliDrive SM. 2. Background. 3. Background. 4. Background. 5. Background. 1957 – First State Driver Education Program.

asasia
Télécharger la présentation

Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 1

  2. Overview • Background • Introduction to IntelliDriveSM • Preliminary Research/Proof of Concept • Potential Applications • Safety • Mobility • Commercial • The Future of IntelliDriveSM 2

  3. Background 3

  4. Background 4

  5. Background 5

  6. Background 1957 – First State Driver Education Program 1967 – State Highway Safety Standards 1968 – Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards 1978 – First Modern ABS System 1984 – National Minimum Drinking Age 1985 – First Vehicles Offer Anti-lock Brakes 1989 – Passive Restraint System Required 1996 – First Graduated Driver Licensing System We have hit a plateau…..  6

  7. Introduction to IntelliDriveSM • What is IntelliDriveSM? • Previously known as VII • Communication Infrastructure • Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) • Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) • Vehicle-to-Handheld Devices (V2D) • What is the purpose of IntelliDriveSM? • Enable applications that provide safety, mobility, commercial, and environmental benefits 7

  8. Introduction to IntelliDriveSM 8

  9. IntelliDrive Coalition 9

  10. Proof of Concept Private Sector Applications Public Sector Applications • Test of System’s Technical Feasibility • Can DSRC accommodate V2V and V2I… • Detroit Test Environment • Robust and secure test environment • 75 center lane-miles • 52 DSRC RSE Units • Series of probe vehicles • Accommodates third party applications, a range of OBE, and a variety of vehicle types • Enables real-time systems measurements 10

  11. Probe Vehicle Data Longitudinal Acceleration Lateral Acceleration Vertical Acceleration Steering Wheel Angle/ Rate of Change Traction Control Activation Stability Control Activation Anti-Lock Brake Activation Tire Pressure Wiper Status Vehicle Exterior Lights Positioning/Trajectory • Latitude • Longitude • Elevation • Heading • Speed Time Date Barometric Pressure Air Temperature Rain/Sun Sensor Environment Event - Based Elements: 11

  12. Data Use Analysis and Processing (DUAP) 12

  13. Safety • Collision warning • Slow / Stopped Traffic • Signal Violation Warning • Emergency vehicle alerts • Active Work Zone • Low Clearance • Curve speed warnings • Blind spot warning 13

  14. Intersection Control Simulation 5) Vehicle receives Signal Phase and Timing (SPaT) information over DSRC 6) Vehicle warning algorithm Processes current vehicle dynamics information and determines if the vehicle can safely proceed through the intersection 7) Warning algorithm determines that the vehicle cannot safely proceed based on the current vehicle dynamics and the time to “red” phase. 8) A warning is issued to the driver at the appropriate time. 1) DSRC equipped vehicle approaches CICAS-V intersection 2) Vehicle receives local GPS correction over DSRC. GPS position is corrected to ~ 0.5m accuracy allowing intersection approach matching 3) Vehicle receives map (Geometric Intersection Description or GID) over DSRC 4) Vehicle position mapped to intersection approach using GID 1 5 0 3 4 2 DSRC radio Processor On Board Equipment (OBE) Road Side Equipment (RSE) GPS Map storage Traffic Control Device GID GPSC SPaT 14

  15. Mobility • GPS Tracking • Smart parking • Ramp metering • Transit signal priority • Real-time routing • Signal Optimization 15

  16. Commercial • Diagnostic and warranty management • Electronic Tolls • AVL – Automatic Vehicle Location • Mobile Weather Stations • Congestion Avoidance – Off Board Navigation • Inspection Stations • TeleNav • Real-Time Travel Times 16

  17. Future of IntelliDriveSM • Requires coordination between: • Government agencies • Auto manufacturers • OEM service providers • Public • Potential User Benefits • Improved safety and mobility • Reduced environmental impacts • Auto and medical insurance benefits • New jobs • Engineering applications 17

  18. How Long Will It All Take? Depends on: Current light vehicle fleet New sales rates Market penetration 18

  19. Future of IntelliDriveSM-Deployment • Phase I • 50% of signalized intersections and all freeways in urban areas with 50% of population • Every Interstate interchange • 131,800 Roadside Units • Phase II • 70% of signalized intersections in 454 urban areas • 10,000 units for smaller communities • 14,000 on Interstates • 239,000 Roadside Units 19

  20. Future of IntelliDriveSMTesting Facilities • Michigan Testbed • Michigan International Speedway (MIS) 20

  21. Future of IntelliDriveSM 21

  22. Further Information on IntelliDriveSM http://www.intellidriveusa.org http://www.its.dot.gov/intellidrive/index.htm 22

  23. Acknowledgements/ Disclaimers • The development of this presentation was supported by the Michigan Ohio University Transportation Center, the U.S. Dept. of Transportation, the Michigan DOT, the University of Detroit Mercy and Wayne State University. • The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. • The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Michigan State Transportation Commission, the Michigan Department of Transportation, or the Federal Highway Administration.

More Related