1 / 17

Paediatric Ambulatory Care 1

Paediatric Ambulatory Care 1. Management of Croup By Robin Hyde. Produced 2010. Croup (Laryngotracheobronchitis). Common childhood illness Peak incidence 2yrs of age m:f ratio 1.5 : 1 Cause= Parainfluenza Result upper airway obstruction S/S Cough (Barking),Stridor,Hoarse,Fever

asasia
Télécharger la présentation

Paediatric Ambulatory Care 1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Paediatric Ambulatory Care 1 Management of Croup By Robin Hyde Produced 2010

  2. Croup (Laryngotracheobronchitis) • Common childhood illness • Peak incidence 2yrs of age m:f ratio 1.5 : 1 • Cause= Parainfluenza • Result upper airway obstruction • S/S Cough (Barking),Stridor,Hoarse,Fever • 1 in 10 children require hospitalisation • Estimated costs $56 million in the US • Mortality rate low 1 in 10,000 • Can be epidemic in the winter months • Wide classification Mild Moderate or Severe • Tools: Westley Croup Score or Modified Taussig Score Bjornson et al (2004) Knutson and Aring (2004) Patient UK (2009)

  3. Clinical Question RATIONALE • No UK Based Guidelines • Sporadic and Variable practice • Formulation of Question PICO format • P= infant,child, paed/paediatrics', croup, Laryngotracheobronchitis, mild, moderate • I = single oral dose dexamethasone • C= single oral dose prednisolone • O= efficacy of treatment, symptom relief, re-admission rate reduced • “In the infant over 3 months of age, presenting to the acute admission unit with mild-moderate croup, does a single dose of dexamethasone match in efficacy of treatment i.e. re-admission rate and symptom relief, compared to a single dose of prednisolone”?

  4. SEARCH STRATEGY • INCLUSION criteria: - RCTs, articles in English, post 2000, infant/child >3 months, solely presenting croup with mild to moderate classification, A&E/AAU • EXCLUSION criteria: - non-English articles, pre 2000, infant/child with predisposing respiratory complication (asthma, CF), severe croup/PICU setting, recent systematic reviews (i.e. In the last 5 years), meta-analysis’ • DATABASE use: - • TRIP database, Clinical evidence, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar • Medline , hits 8 • Cinahl, hits 6 • Embase, hits 6 • BNI, Hits 0 • 2 Articles chosen to use

  5. ARTICLES... • Prednisolone versus dexamethasone in croup: a randomised equivalence trial • Sparrow and Geelhoed (2006) • Comparison between single-dose oral Prednisolone and oral dexamethasone in the treatment of croup: a randomised, double blinded clinical trial • Fifoot and Ting (2007)

  6. Appraisal? CASP tool format ( PHRU 2006) • 10 questions to make sense of Randomised Controlled Studies • QUESTION 1 • Did the study ask a clearly-focused question?

  7. 10 questions to make sense of Randomised Controlled Studies • QUESTION 2 • Was this a randomised controlled trial and was it appropriately so?

  8. 10 questions to make sense of Randomised Controlled Studies • QUESTION 3 • Were participants appropriately allocated to intervention and control groups? • *please see Appendix 1

  9. 10 questions to make sense of Randomised Controlled Studies • QUESTION 4 • Were participants, staff and study personnel ‘blind’ to participants study group?

  10. 10 questions to make sense of Randomised Controlled Studies • QUESTION 5 • Were all of the participants who entered the trial accounted for at its conclusion?

  11. 10 questions to make sense of Randomised Controlled Studies • QUESTION 6 • Were the participants in all groups followed up and data collected in the same way?

  12. 10 questions to make sense of Randomised Controlled Studies • QUESTION 7 • Did the study have enough participants to minimise the play of chance?

  13. 10 questions to make sense of Randomised Controlled Studies • QUESTION 8 • How are the results presented and what is the main result?

  14. 10 questions to make sense of Randomised Controlled Studies • QUESTION 9 • How precise are these results? • QUESTION 10 • Were all important outcomes considered so the results can be applied?

  15. DISCUSSION and CONCLUSION • Can I answer my clinical question from this appraisal? • Inconclusive-there is some evidence to support that dexamethasone provides more efficient treatment than prednisolone but not enough to say conclusively • More research required • Primary care • Over a longer period • ? Does multiple doses of corticosteroids provide improved efficacy in treatment than single doses? • APNP will be guided by local policy • Possibility of change locally • ?NEED FOR SOME UK GUIDELINES

  16. References • Appraisal tool for randomised controlled trials studies NHS Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (2006) http://www.phru.nhs.uk/casp/appraisa.htm (accessed 20/08/2009) • Bjornson, C L Klassen, T P Williamson, J Brant , R Mitton C, Plint , A Bulloch, B Evered, L and Johnson, D (2004) A randomised trial of a single dose of oral dexamethasone for mild croup The New England Journal of Medicine 13 : 351 1306-1313 • Fifoot, A and Ting, Y S (2007) Comparison between single-dose oral prednisolone and oral dexamethasone in the treatment of croup: a randomised double blinded clinical trial Emergency Medicine Australasia 19 51-58 • Knutson, D and Aring, A (2004) Viral Croup American Family Physician 69 535-542 • Johnston, D (2008) Croup Clinical Evidence http://clinicalevidence.bmj.com/ceweb/conditions/chd/0321/0321-get.pdf(accessed 04/12/09) • Patient Uk-Croup http://www.patient.co.uk/health/Croup.htm accessed 17/11/09 • Sparrow, A and Geelhoed, G (2006) Prednisolone versus dexamethasone in croup: a randomised equivalence trial Archives of Disease in Childhood 91 580-583 • Westley CR, Ross EK, and Brooks JG. Nebulised racemic epinephrine by IPPB for the treatment of croup American Journal of Disease in the Child 1978;132:484–487 • Westley Croup Score http://www.welshem.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&)id=92:westley-croup-score&catid=47:scoring&Itemid=73 (accessed 17/11/09)

  17. Appendix 1 • Westley Croup Score • Total score ranging from 0–17 points. Five component items make up the score: • • Stridor (0 = none, 1 = with agitation only, 2 = at rest) • • Retractions (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) • • Cyanosis (0 = none, 4 = cyanosis with agitation, 5 = cyanosis at rest) • • Level of consciousness (0 = normal [including asleep], 5 = disorientated) • Mild= score 0-2 • Moderate= score 3-5 • Severe= score 6-11 • Impending respiratory failure= score > 11 • Modified Taussig Croup Score • Stridor • None 0 • Only on crying, exertion 1 • At rest 2 • Severe (biphasic) 3 • Retractions • None 0 • Only on crying, exertion 1 • At rest 2 • Severe (biphasic) 3 • *1-2 mild, 3-4 moderate, 5-6 severe Westley et al (1978) Johnston (2008)

More Related