1 / 19

Geometry e-Learning System

1. Valeri KRIVTSOV Institute for System Analysis Russian Academy of Sciences. Geometry e-Learning System. ICME-10, July 2004. 2. TT2K’s General Functionality. The prototype e-learning system is called TT2K.

asher
Télécharger la présentation

Geometry e-Learning System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 1 Valeri KRIVTSOV Institute for System Analysis Russian Academy of Sciences Geometry e-Learning System ICME-10, July 2004

  2. 2 TT2K’s General Functionality The prototype e-learning system is called TT2K. The TT2K is a distributed NG e-learning system supplied with advanced functionality reachable on the Internet. • The TT2K is capable of: • treating any SCORM-compliant learning course • forming an individual route through the course • creating mini-courses on user demand • storing and retrieving individual results of learning • supporting other learning functions. ICME-10, July 2004

  3. 3 Learning Geometry with TT2K The TT2K prototype is adjusted to teach school geometry. It handles an electronic version of the “Geometry 7” – the school manual by Igor Sharygin. In order to teach geometry the TT2K is supplied with advanced functionality: • providing live geometrical sketches support • supporting real-time collaborations between student and teacher on the Internet • supporting remote collaborative solving of geometrical problems on the Internet. ICME-10, July 2004

  4. 4 Exclusive TT2K’s Functionality The TT2K possesses one exclusive feature: it supports real-time student-teacher complicated collaboration on the Internet. Both “real-time” and “collaboration” are important here: • most of students cannot concentrate their attention if response time exceeds a certain value • valuable learning is impossible without collaboration, because computer can assist a teacher but cannot replace him completely. To our best knowledge there are few systems that support the both functions, and no one system supports these two functions and any complicated e-learning feature simultaneously.  ICME-10, July 2004

  5. 5 How To Compare e-Learning Systems? The TT2K is only a one of many e-learning systems. What for is it? Is it better then others? And how can we compare different e-Learning Systems? The answers to the above questions are of great importance for the entire e-learning community. Here are some thoughts on possible classification. Let us consider three classification criteria: • the response time of the Internet networking • intensity of cooperation • complexity of e-learning core functionality. ICME-10, July 2004

  6. 6 Response Time Classification Criterion The response time is an extremely important parameter of all e-learning systems. The “response time” classification criterion r depends on the mode of work on the Internet. We assume that it may take four integer values: 0,1,2,3. r=0 : r=1 : r=2 : r=3 : {no Internet (simple PC, local network)} {off-line Internet (e-mail, FTP, …)} {on-line Internet (WWW, …)} {real-time Internet (GRIDs, CORBA, …)}. Example. In the case of solving construction problems with the TT2K, r=3. ICME-10, July 2004

  7. 7 Collaboration Intensity Classification Criterion The “collaboration intensity” c is the next criterion. It may take four integer values either: 0,1,2,3. c=0 : c=1 : c=2 : c=3 : {one user (no collaboration)} {many parallel (independent) users} { static “one-to-one” or “one-to-many” collaborations} { dynamic “many-to-many” collaborations} Example. In the case of solving construction problems with the TT2K on the Internet, c=2. ICME-10, July 2004

  8. 8 Core Functions Classification Criterion We have not considered yet the e-learning functions themselves. The criterion f of “core functions” reflects approximately the level of complexity of the e-learning functions. It also takes four integer levels: 0,1,2,3. f=0 : f=1 : f=2 : f=3 : {texts, drawings, sound, video, animation} {interactivity, Q & T, guided navigation, …} {adaptability, virtual laboratories,…} {intellectuality, proof checking, …} Example. In the case of solving problems with the TT2K on the Internet, f=2. ICME-10, July 2004

  9. 9 Applying rcf Model: Examples Every e-learning function can be represented by a fixed value tuple rcf consisting of the above three criteria. Example 1. For live geometry sketchpad, rcf = (0,0,2). Example 2. For typical SCORM systems, rcf = (2,1,1). Example 3. For hypertext e-manuals, rcf = (2,1,0). Example 4. For video conferences, rcf = (3,2,0). Example 5. For the first generation distance e-learning systems, rcf = (1,2,0). Example 6. For instant messaging systems, rcf = (3,2,0). ICME-10, July 2004

  10. Live geometry sketchpads f Typical SCORM systems Hypertext e-manuals Video conferences First generation DLSs Instant messaging systems r c 10 Applying rcf Model: Example Rendering Let us render all possible values of tuples to a 3-dimentional integer cube. Since every e-learning function has an unique rcf, all such functions may be mapped in this cube. ICME-10, July 2004

  11. 11 Applying rcf Model: SOA Analysis (1/2) • Results of applying the rcf model to the state-of-the-art analysis of the e-learning domain: • 1. Few existing systems support functions satisfying the conditions • r = 3, c = 2. • 2. The TT2K is the single e-learning system satisfying the conditions • r = 3, c = 2, f >= 1. • 3. None of the existing systems supports any e-learning function satisfying the conditions • c = 3 or f = 3. ICME-10, July 2004

  12. 12 Applying rcf Model: SOA Analysis (2/2) • 4 (main SOA hypothesis). The entire set of e-learning functions provided by existing e-learning systems satisfies the condition • r + c + f <= 6. Summary. All of the existing e-learning system functionalities are located within the region defined by the conditions r + c + f <= 6, c <= 2, f <= 2. ICME-10, July 2004

  13. The resulting region looks as follows: 13 Applying rcf Model: SOA Result Rendering • The above listed conditions cut the classification cube in a special manner. f c r ICME-10, July 2004

  14. 14 Applying rcf Model:NG System Definition Every system that supports e-learning functions with r + c + f >= 7 or c=3 or f = 3, may be called NG e-learning system. ICME-10, July 2004

  15. 15 Applying rcf Model:TT2K is NG Solving geometrical problems with the TT2K on the Internet possesses rcf = (3,2,2). So the TT2K is really an NG e-Learning System. ICME-10, July 2004

  16. 16 TT2K Demonstration scenarios The main presentation concerns the next two TT2K’s functions (scenarios). Scenario 1. Learning school geometry for the 7th form, rcf = (2,1,2). The learning course is made on the basis of the “Geometry 7-9” school manual by Igor Sharygin. Scenario 2. Collaborative solving of geometrical construction problems on the Internet, rcf = (3,2,2). ICME-10, July 2004

  17. 17 Scenario 1: Prerequisites 31 урок, связаны отношениями предшествования Примеры Пререквизиты урока 5: второй и четвертый Пререквизиты урока 2: первый Пререквизиты урока 4: третий Пререквизит урока 3: первый ICME-10, July 2004

  18. 18 Scenario 1: Prerequisite Rendering Скриншот со стрелками ICME-10, July 2004

  19. 19 Scenario 1: Mini-Course Скриншот ICME-10, July 2004

More Related