Download
face perception is modulation by sexual preference n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Face Perception is Modulation by Sexual Preference PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Face Perception is Modulation by Sexual Preference

Face Perception is Modulation by Sexual Preference

84 Vues Download Presentation
Télécharger la présentation

Face Perception is Modulation by Sexual Preference

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Face Perception is Modulation by Sexual Preference (Kranz & Ishai, 2006) Melody Sinclair-Brooks PSYC 260

  2. Overview • Introduction • Hypothesis • Methods • Results • Discussion • My Opinion

  3. Introduction • Face perception is mediated by a distributed neural system in the human brain

  4. Introduction The response to faces is modulated by cognitive factors such as: • attention • visual imagery • emotion

  5. However, the effects of gender and sexual orientation on peoples response to faces is currently unknown.

  6. Hypothesis • Kranz & Ishai expected a significant relationship between the gender of the image presented and the sexual preference of the participant. • Greater response to an image will correspond to a greater activation in the reward circuitry regions of the brain Sexual Preference  Brain activation  Response

  7. The reward circuitry: The brain’s “pleasure center” • The reward circuitry consists of the dopaminergic pathways in the brain • These circuits are evolutionarily important for natural rewards such as food, music, and sex

  8. Heterosexual men and homosexual women are expected to respond more to female faces.

  9. Heterosexual women and homosexual men are expected to respond more to male faces.

  10. Methods • Researchers used fMRI to test whether subjects would respond more to their sexually preferred faces...

  11. Subjects • 40 normal, right-handed subjects with normal vision (Mean age ± SD= 26 ± 3years) • 10 heterosexual women & 10 homosexual women • 10 heterosexual men & 10 homosexual men

  12. Procedure • Stimuli were projected onto a translucent screen placed at the feet of the subject Subjects viewed: • Grayscalephotographs of faces (3 runs each) and • Assessed facial attractiveness (5 runs each)

  13. Procedure Each run: Participants were shown images of faces alternating with images of phase scrambled faces within a period of 30s • They had 21s for viewing and 12s for attractiveness rating

  14. Face (3s) Phase-scrambled face (3s) Each stimulus was presented for 3 seconds, with no blank periods between the stimuli

  15. Procedure i. Viewing Condition: • During the viewing condition, 60 male and 60 female unfamiliar, famous, and emotional faces were presented ii. Attractiveness assessment: • During the assessment of facial attractiveness, 100 male and 100 female faces were presented Reaction times were recorded. The order of runs was randomized across subjects.

  16. Procedure ii. Attractiveness assessment (cont’d): Subjects pressed 1 of 3 buttons to indicate whether a face was: • attractive • neutral • unattractive

  17. Independent Variables: • Face or Phase-Scrambled face • Sexual Preference Dependent Variables: • Attractiveness rating • Brain activation

  18. Data Acquisition • Whole body MR scanner (Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands) • Changes in the blood-oxygenation-level-dependent MRI signal were measured • High resolution structural images were collected in the same session for all the subjects (180 axial slices) • The high-resolution anatomical images were used to build a 3D brain atlas

  19. Data Analysis • fMRI data analyzed in BrainVoyager QX Version 1.3 (Brain Innovation, Maastricht, The Netherlands) • All volumes were corrected for motion artifacts, realigned, and spatially smoothed with a 5mm FWHM Gaussian filter.

  20. Anatomical Regions Observed • inferior occipital gyrus (IOG) • lateral fusiformgyrus (FG) • superior temporal sulcus (STS) • amygdala • intraparietalsulcus (IPS) • caudate • putamen • mediodorsal nucleus of the thalamus (mdT) • anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) • insula • inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) • medial orbitofrontal cortex (OFC)

  21. Data Analysis • The fMRI images for faces were subtracted from the fMRI images of the scrambled faces • This difference indicated the activation for the brain areas when faces were being viewed Scrambled Face signal – Face signal =Activation

  22. How were the trials sorted for each subject? • According to their attractiveness score • According to the mean of the parameter estimates that was calculated for attractive, neutral, and unattractive male and female faces

  23. What were the parameter estimates used for? • Between-subjects random-effects analyses to control for any random effects between subjects

  24. Results • There was a significant interaction between stimulus gender and the sexual preference of the subject in the thalamus (mdT) and medial orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) • Heterosexual men and homosexual women responded more to female faces • Heterosexual women and homosexual men responded more to male faces

  25. mdT= mediodorsal nucleus of the thalamus OFC = medial orbitofrontal cortex

  26. Results • Regardless of gender or sexual orientation, participants had very similar assessments of attractiveness of both male and female faces.

  27. Discussion Activation in the medial orbitofrontal cortex (OFC): The OFC is involved in representing the reward value of sensory stimuli: • including beautiful faces, abstract positive and negative reinforcers Activation in the thalamus (mdT) : it is reciprocally connected to the OFC and will therefore show similar patterns of activation

  28. Discussion • Facial beauty is considered an indicator of reproductive fitness – perhaps why men and women equally notice and respond to beauty of the same and opposite sex

  29. Discussion • Recent studies have reported that facial beauty evokes activation in the reward circuitry regions of the brain...

  30. ...... especially for reproductive success in sexually-relevant faces I I WANT YOUR BABIES.

  31. Conclusion • Male and female face stimuli evoke similar neural activation within a distributed cortical network that includes: Visual, Limbic, and Prefrontal regions • Sexually relevant faces elicit stronger neural responses in the reward circuitry

  32. My Opinion • Kranz & Ishai analyzed many brain regions, doing a thorough investigation • Perhaps they could have included diagrams for the procedure when explaining the steps as it was not crystal clear and provide an example of the phase-scrambled faces used • Future research could investigate the effect of peoples’ ethnic background on assessing attractiveness and activating certain brain areas

  33. Questions? Thank you.