1 / 23

Human rights & the state in modern international relations 現代國際關係中的人權與國家

Human rights & the state in modern international relations 現代國際關係中的人權與國家. Dr. Titus C. Chen Assistant Research Fellow, Institute of International Relations, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. Session II (03/05/2010) Agenda. John Lennon, Give Peace a Chance (1969)

astra
Télécharger la présentation

Human rights & the state in modern international relations 現代國際關係中的人權與國家

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Human rights & the state in modern international relations現代國際關係中的人權與國家 Dr. Titus C. Chen Assistant Research Fellow, Institute of International Relations, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.

  2. Session II (03/05/2010) Agenda • John Lennon, Give Peace a Chance (1969) • Human rights news report • Weekly readings • What human rights? • Whose human rights? • Who decides human rights for others? • Western heritage of human rights

  3. What human rights? • An expanding list of HR (Donnelly, IHR, p. 7) • Categories of early HR • The freedom of religion and opinion • The right to life • The right to private property • Presented as natural rights • HR evolved from concrete human experiences that stimulated political philosophies & actions

  4. Two origins of modern HR (1)The modern state (a) • Modern inter-state system in Europe • Religious wars in 16th & 17th centuries • The 1648 Westphalian system • The prince as the territorial sovereign • The absolutist monarchical state • Religious freedom for the state, not subjects • Provision of religious asylum for dissenters

  5. Two origins of modern HR (2)The modern state (b) • Civil rights • The freedom of religion • The freedom of opinion • The right to life

  6. Two origins of modern HR (3)The modern market (a) • Appearance of the Bourgeoisie • The propertied class • Financially independent to the sovereign state • Landed country gentry (agricultural) • Urban residents with skills in trades (merchant)

  7. Two origins of modern HR (4)The modern market (b) • Economic rights • The right to private property • The right to manage one’s property

  8. Western heritage of modern HR (I)The Enlightenment legacy (a) • The era of Voltaire, John Locke, Jean-Jacque Rousseau, Montesquieu, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Paine, etc. • Belief in reason & reasoning capacity as the defining characteristic of human beings • Reason as the legitimate source of political authority • From reason to secularism—decline of organized religion in politics

  9. Western heritage of modern HR (I)The Enlightenment legacy (b) • Those who can reason and articulate independently are rational, self-interested beings • They know what their interests and goals are • They can find means to fulfill their own interests and pursue their own goals • They should be granted inalienable rights to satisfy their interests and goals • Men have natural rights to pursue “liberty, health, liberty, or possession.”

  10. Western heritage of modern HR (I)The Enlightenment legacy (c) • Classical liberalism • The origin of liberal democracy • Social contract as the foundation of a polity • A limited government

  11. Western heritage of modern HR (I)The Enlightenment legacy (d) • Provisos of enjoying natural rights • Gender – are women rational beings? • Race – are the “colored” a whole person?

  12. Western heritage of modern HR (I)The Enlightenment legacy (e) • Provisos of holding political rights • Gender • Race • Financial independence - property • Literacy - education • Time - leisure

  13. Western heritage of modern HR (II)The preeminent roles of the state (a) • State sovereignty as the dominant principle of political organization in the modern international system that’s based on the norms of anarchy & non-intervention • The prominence of the state as the precondition of modern HR development

  14. Western heritage of modern HR (II)The preeminent roles of the state (b) • HR as a set of practices regulating relations btw. the state and its citizens/subjects • The state as the predominant provider and guarantor of HR • The state perpetrated the most egregious HR violations • Citizens/subjects had to deal mainly with the state/state agents to realize their HR

  15. Western heritage of modern HR (II)The preeminent roles of the state (c) • This Western idea influenced even non-Western HR development—STATE-LED protection of HR • Changed understanding of the place of individuals in international relations

  16. Western heritage of modern HR (II)The preeminent roles of the state (d) • Juridical tendency of the state (i) • From religious/cultural/racial/ethnic • Through territorial • To juridical sense of the state sovereignty and the citizenship • Law-based definition of citizenship and HR protection for citizens • Law in both senses of natural law and positive law

  17. Western heritage of modern HR (II)The preeminent roles of the state (d) • Juridical tendency of the state (ii) • Provision and protection of HR is mostly formalized into law/binding regulations through legislative/rule-making processes • Advocacy for HR by citizens usually aim at enactment of certain legislation • Preeminence of law, legal institutions, and lawyers in HR protection

  18. Western heritage of modern HR (III) • Implications • Do Western elements of HR make it less universal? • Does the Western heritage make HR less appealing/applicable to the rest of the world?

  19. 3 models of implementing HR (1)The Statist model • State-centered & only the state • HR as a matter of sovereign national jurisdiction • HR as a matter of purely domestic nature • Applying the norm of non-intervention • Resist international/foreign intervention • It’s an international system

  20. 3 models of implementing HR (2)The Cosmopolitan model • Individuals & social groups as the legitimate international actors • The state is to fulfill HR as demanded by citizens, NGOs, and international advocacy groups • HR issues are not stopped at state borders • Advocate for international intervention • It’s a global/world society

  21. 3 models of implementing HR (3)The Internationalist model • Transnational HR advocacy is permissible only to the extent that is authorized by international law, which are formulated by states • Emphasis on multilateral/bilateral negotiations and rule-based deliberation among states • It’s an international society

  22. Realist skepticism of HR • Realism is couched on the belief of the self-interested or interest-based human nature • Realism suggests that states pursue the maximization of national interests, measured in terms of power and security • Realism understands HR as moral principles and argues against the idea of promoting HR by foreign policy

  23. Have a great weekend! • Bob Dylan, The Times They are a-changin’ (1964)

More Related