1 / 54

Tuning Up your Common Assessments

This session explores the importance of quality classroom assessments and provides strategies for creating assessments that align with standards, have balanced representation, and effectively measure student understanding. Participants will deconstruct assessments and evaluate their alignment with standards, and discuss the qualities necessary for high-quality assessments.

aubreyj
Télécharger la présentation

Tuning Up your Common Assessments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Tuning Up your Common Assessments Michigan School Testing Conference February 21, 2012 Dr. Ed Roeber Kim Young Dr. Ellen Vorenkamp

  2. What one question might you ask to explore your notion? Let’s speculate about the people in the room  Who Are We?

  3. Next 5 minutes, circulate around room • Name, professional role, district • Ask your question without comment or clarification and record data • Analyze data • What assumptions might you make about people in the room? • To what extent did your question give you the data you were looking for? Who Are We?

  4. Participants will recognize the need for quality classroom assessments including elements such as: • Standard/Item Alignment • Balance of Representation • Target/Method Match • Quality Items • Test Blueprints • Participants will reflect on and modify (where needed) current assessments Outcomes

  5. Setting the stage… Table activity Protocol – Chalk Talk Center of chart paper write Quality Assessments Without comment… What are your hunches about the need to build high quality assessments?

  6. Think…Pair…Share • What elements are necessary to assure quality common assessments? • List these qualities • Discuss why these are important Key Questions

  7. Validity Checklist • Standard Alignment • Balance of Representation • Target/Method Match • Quality Items • Test Blueprints Rubric Review

  8. Activity • Break it apart…see what you have… Deconstructing Assessments

  9. Are the assessment items tightly aligned with the standards? • Are there an equal number of items per standard? If not, is there “rationale”? • Are there enough items per standard to determine mastery? Deconstructing Debrief

  10. Please return in 15 minutes Break

  11. Knowledge – facts and concepts we want students to know • Reasoning – using what they know to reason and solve problems • Skills – students use their knowledge and reasoning to act skillfully • Products – use knowledge, reasoning, and skills to create a concrete product Kinds of Learning Targets

  12. Selected Response/Short Response • True/false, multiple-choice, matching, fill-in-the-blank, short answers • Extended Response • Essays, research reports and lab reports • Performance • Public performances, investigations • Personal Communication through conversation/observation • Oral exams, interviews, discussion groups Method of Assessment

  13. Target-Method Match How well does your method of assessment match your target?

  14. With an “elbow” partner….. • TMM Chart – fill in the grid • Which way may be best? • Good match • Partial match • Not a good match Target-Method-Match

  15. Target-Method Match How well does your method of assessment match your target?

  16. Target Method Match

  17. In looking at items on your assessment, might there be an assessment method that could better capture evidence of student understanding of a standard? • What will you stay mindful of as you rethink or develop assessment items to assess standards?

  18. Quality Items

  19. Remember – the development of good items takes time and careful thought General Item Writing Guidelines

  20. A 48 ft B* 28 ft C 24 ft D 14 ft Correct answer Distractors (Incorrect Options or Foils) Stem What is the perimeter of a rectangular vegetable garden with dimensions 6 feet by 8 feet? (Key) Parts of a Multiple-Choice Item

  21. Align items to a standard • Target the appropriate Depth of Knowledge • Use clear, concise language • Use correct grammar • Use appropriate reading level • Avoid the use of the word “you” and “I” • Avoid using synonyms within the item General Guidelines

  22. Avoid unnecessary complexity • Don’t assume prior knowledge • Remember: Formatting matters: font sizes, distractor placement, etc. General Guidelines

  23. Guidelines About Writing Stems

  24. Open-ended statement, followed by (usually) 3 or 4 answer choices • Closed question, followed by (usually) 3 or 4 answer choices Two Types of Multiple Choice Stems

  25. One of the factors of x2 – 5x – 36 is ___ A x + 3 B x - 4 C x + 6 D* x - 9 Which of the following is a factor of x2 – 5x – 36? A x + 3 B x - 4 C x + 6 D* x - 9 Open-ended stem Closed question stem Examples

  26. Stuff the stem • Avoid redundancy • Avoid the use of negatives • Avoid clues in the stem • Ensure lead materials are essential to the item Multiple Choice Items General Guidelines

  27. Lead The stem and leaf plot gives the ages of the people who answered survey questions after buying a pair of roller blades on an Internet auction. Stem Leaf 1234567 7 7 8 8 8 8 9 0 1 3 3 5 2 4 6 7 1 3 3 5 7 9 9 4 5 2 0 3 Key: 3 2 means 32 What is the median age of the people who answered the survey questions? Question Stems With a Graphic/Stimulus

  28. Guidelines for Writing Response Options

  29. A 48 ft B* 28 ft C 24 ft D 14 ft Correct answer Distractors (Incorrect Options) Stem What is the perimeter of a rectangular vegetable garden with dimensions 6 feet by 8 feet? (Key) Parts of a Multiple Choice Item 31

  30. Use direct, clear terminology • Use plausible distractors/foils • Use equal length and detail • Make all distractors equally attractive • Organize the options General Guidelines for Writing Response Options

  31. Have only one correct answer • Do not use overlapping answers • Vary placement of option choices • Good Items are fair items • Avoid using “All of the Above” and “None of the Above” General Guidelines

  32. Constructed Response Items

  33. A constructed response item is an assessment item that asks students to apply knowledge, skills, and/or critical thinking abilities to real-world, standards driven performance tasks. • It requires a brief written response from students. They often have several parts. Students have to write, draw, and/or explain their answers. Constructed Response Items

  34. Sometimes called “open-response” items, constructed response items are so named because they ask students to use their own thinking and background knowledge to develop answers without the benefit of any suggestions or choices. • Constructed response items often have more than one way to correctly answer the question. Constructed Response Items

  35. Constructed Response items are good to use when you want students to: • Show their work • Explain a process • Compete a chart • Perform a geometric construction • Construct a graph • Identify patterns • Write an essay Constructed Response Items

  36. Tie constructed response items to higher-level objectives. • This type of item is good to use when you want to test a skill that can’t be easily measured with a selected-response item. HOTS Constructed Response Items

  37. Two primary types of constructed response items: • Brief Constructed Response • Extended Constructed Response Constructed Response Items

  38. Require about 1-3 minutes of student response time • Usually represented by one of the following 5 formats: • Fill in the blank • Short Answer • Label a diagram • Visual representation • Show your work Brief Constructed Response Items

  39. Extended response items require students to provide evidence of understanding regarding a situation that demands more than a selected response or brief constructed response. • They usually involve 20-30 minutes of student response time Extended Response Items

  40. May require students to reflect and respond in a variety of contexts, such as: • Write an essay from a prompt • Take a position on a specific topic and support their stance • Solve a problem • Respond to findings of an investigation and/ or experiment • Respond to written text Extended Response Items

  41. Guidelines • Carefully word directions and prompts • Allow sufficient time for completion • Have resources necessary for item completion on hand and ready for use • Share with students elements/characteristics of a successful response, where appropriate Extended Response Items

  42. When designing common assessments, use a variety of brief constructed response items…(these could include short answers, fill-in-the-blank, show-your-work and visual representations) as well as extended constructed response items. • Be sure they are aligned to appropriate (usually higher-level) learning targets Constructed Response Items

  43. The item should be clear and specific about what students should do. • A Constructed response item may have several questions. • Allow for more than one way for students to respond. Constructed Response Items

  44. Include necessary visual representations such as charts, graphs, pictures, short readings, and cartoons. • Determine points possible for each item. Constructed Response Items

  45. Usually constructed response items are worth 2 or more points depending on the difficulty of the item and the task being performed. • Design a scoring protocol, based on the number of points possible, for each constructed-response item. • Scoring protocols are typically specific to each individual item Constructed Response Items

  46. Dot Activity • Green= Item is good to go • Yellow = Item may need to be modified • Red = Item is not well-written and needs to be scrapped Quality Item Hunt

  47. Assessment Blueprints

  48. Did you develop your assessment blueprint prior to developing your common assessment? • Why is this desirable? • Have you reviewed or modified your test blueprint during the development process? • Does your or will your assessment reflect your intended blueprint? Reflective Questions

More Related