1 / 51

SECOND ORDER SCIENCE: LOGIC, STRATEGIES, METHODS

SECOND ORDER SCIENCE: LOGIC, STRATEGIES, METHODS. Stuart A. Umpleby Department of Management The George Washington University Washington, DC. An early transition in our conception of knowledge.

aurora
Télécharger la présentation

SECOND ORDER SCIENCE: LOGIC, STRATEGIES, METHODS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SECOND ORDER SCIENCE:LOGIC, STRATEGIES, METHODS Stuart A. Umpleby Department of Management The George Washington University Washington, DC

  2. An early transition in our conception of knowledge • Robert Boyle was part of a luncheon club in London in the mid 1600s, which was called the “invisible college” • This group became the Royal Society of London for the Improvement of Natural Knowledge in 1663 • This is one indication of a transition in the mid 1600s from theological knowledge to natural (scientific) knowledge

  3. Robert Boyle (1627-1691)

  4. A current transition to reflexive knowledge • Many people have contributed to the current change in thinking • Heinz von Foerster, second order cybernetics • George Soros, reflexivity theory in economics • Karl Mueller, second order research • Vladimir Lefebvre, ethical cognition • Louis Kauffman, knot theory • Klaus Krippendorff, the reflexive turn

  5. Heinz von Foerster (1911-2002)

  6. George Soros

  7. Karl Mueller

  8. Vladimir Lefebvre

  9. Louis Kauffman

  10. Klaus Krippendorff

  11. The basic idea • Science can be expanded by adding the observer to what is observed • We could shift our thinking from viewing science as creating descriptions of systems to viewing science as an active part of social systems • We would think about the co-evolution of theories and society

  12. World 1 3 Description Observer 2

  13. How we think about social science • It is easy to accept that theories affect society • We create theories because we hope that people will accept them, act on them and society will perhaps operate better • However, when we do science, we pretend that theories do not affect what is studied • We act this way because we think this is the way to create objective descriptions • But we can expand our conception of science

  14. Three conceptions of Science 2 • Meta-science: combining the results of many studies in order to create more holistic, more useable knowledge (K.H. Mueller) • Take advantage of the internet to cooperate in scientific research and sharing of data (Ben Shneiderman) • Take account of the observer and examine the co-evolution of theories and phenomena, particularly in the social sciences

  15. Four models underlying science • Linear causality – many statistical methods are available, e.g., correlation and multiple regression • Circular causality – inherent in regulation, system dynamics models • Self-organization – Adam Smith, Charles Darwin, complex adaptive systems • Reflexivity – von Foerster, Soros, Lefebvre

  16. Reflexivity • Observe, decide, act, observe… • A circular process • The observer is included • Operates on two levels of analysis – observation and participation

  17. Examples from several fields • Management • Sociology • Economics

  18. Including the observer is not completely new • The field of management is largely a collection of methods • How to improve a manufacturing process • How to conduct a strategic planning exercise • But little attention has been paid to connecting this form of knowledge to the philosophy of science • Reflexivity theory makes this possible

  19. Second order knowledge in management • In management there is a large literature on how to do things, on how a manager should act • The most useful literature has often been created by consultants rather than academics • But most professors of management attempt to emulate the physical sciences • Managers often say that the management literature is not helpful to them

  20. Sociology of knowledge • Our position in society influences what we believe • If we are rich, society is working well • If we are poor, society is not working well • Culture, religion, and educational background all shape what we see and how we think • Hence, there is an interaction between society and what we think

  21. The nature of knowledge in economics • Economics is the social science that has been most successful in imitating classical science • Quantification has been easier in economics than other social sciences • Economics is now defined primarily by its methods rather than its subject matter

  22. Equilibrium theory in economics • Physicists at first dealt with small numbers of objects – planets, pendula, billiard balls • But gases involve many millions of particles • So, to create thermodynamics physicists looked at gross parameters – pressure, volume, temperature • Economists adopted this model – imports, exports, savings, GDP

  23. Behavioral economics • Equilibrium theory in economics uses the concept of self-organization – elements of a system go to their stable, equilibrial states • When there is a disturbance (e.g., a new technology or new legislation), people seek to return to equilibrium • Several assumptions – they seek to maximize personal profit; people are rational; they have equal and complete information

  24. Progress in recent years • Behavioral economics has challenged the view of human beings in economics • Several people have won Nobel Prizes by showing that people do not always seek to maximize profit, that they are not always rational, and that they that they do not have the same information

  25. Additional assumptions in economics • There is another, more philosophical, set of assumptions that economists have not yet addressed • The classical philosophy of science assumed • The observer is not included in what is observed • Theories do not affect what is observed • Do these assumptions fit the social sciences, or do we create theories in an effort to change social systems?

  26. Kaletsky in Capitalism 4.0 • A laissez faire approach to macroeconomics followed the stock market crash of 1929 • An interventionist period, based on the theories of Keynes began during the 1930s • A move toward fewer state-owned enterprises and less government regulation was influenced by Hayek and Friedman • Lately there has been a return to the belief that some regulation is necessary

  27. The history of economic theories • In the physical sciences theories get better over time • However, in economics there are fluctuations between the belief that markets will solve all problems and the belief that government intervention is necessary • Perhaps this is why the history of economic thought is no longer taught in many universities in the U.S.

  28. The loss of history in economics • “There is not time enough to teach the old ideas, since there is so much new stuff to teach” • The old theories, which were verbal rather than quantitative, are seen as inferior to newer ideas • But there seem to be fluctuations in economic theories?

  29. Need for second order theory • Current economic theories are elements in the regulation of an economy • A second order theory is needed to describe how first order theories are to be used • A current economic theory can be viewed as a partial description or a temporary description or a context dependent description • A second order theory of economics would be a cybernetic theory, a theory of control by using ideas

  30. Correcting underlying assumptions • Behavioral economics is an effort to correct specific assumptions underlying equilibrium theory or the idea of an economy as a self-organizing system • Reflexivity theory challenges assumptions about science -- that theories do not affect the operation of an economy and that older theories can be discarded

  31. Second order science • The idea of second order science is more relevant for the social sciences than the physical sciences • Science itself is a social process • Cybernetics is a theory of information and regulation in somewhat the same way that physics is a theory of matter and energy

  32. How to do second order science • An academic discipline requires methods which can be practiced • What are some methods for doing second order science?

  33. Several methods for second order science • The influence cycle is similar to the credit cycle and the leverage cycle • Interaction between ideas and society, an historical approach (shoelace model) • Examine social activities in terms of ideas, groups, events, and variables • A comparative approach

  34. Amount of + credit + + Lending + Collateral Debt activity values service + - Economic + stimulus _ The credit cycle

  35. opportunities for + innovation + + deregulation of + economic abuse of asymmetric business activity growth information + - belief in the + value of markets _ The influence cycle

  36. Why practice second order science? • It is more realistic • We cease pretending that social systems are like physical systems • New scientific theories and methods will be invented • With a larger conception of science we will be able to explain and to influence processes we could not otherwise

  37. Reasons not to do second order science • Giving up a claim of objectivity means giving up a claim to special authority • The informal fallacies caution against errors in language, emotion and thought • Circular reasoning, language • Ad hominem fallacy, emotion • Fallacy of accent, thought • Self-reference leads to paradox and hence logical inconsistency

  38. Coping with self-reference • In practical affairs we routinely deal with the logical problem of self-reference • We seek to eliminate conflicts of interest • The Fifth Amendment prohibits self-incrimination • We let juries decide whom and what to believe • When we do science we try to construct logically consistent theories

  39. Why should we not be deterred? • In practical affairs we have learned to cope with self-reference • We commonly see ourselves as participants in a multi-player game • We lose nothing by adding a new dimension to science • The science we practiced before we can still practice

  40. The Correspondence Principle • Proposed by Niels Bohr when developing the quantum theory • Any new theory should reduce to the old theory to which it corresponds for those cases in which the old theory is known to hold • A new dimension is required • By applying the correspondence principle to the philosophy of science, we change not just one theory or one field but all of science

  41. Old philosophy of science Amount of attention paid to the observer New philosophy of science An Application of the Correspondence Principle

  42. The effect on science policy • Science policy today is mostly an exercise in budgeting • An alternative approach is to study the history of science • Study science as a social activity – history, philosophy, cognitive science, sociology of science • What practices have been helpful? How has the most innovative science been produced?

  43. Logic • Include the observer in what is observed • In the social sciences theories can change the phenomenon observed • Knowledge can be organized as methods as well as theories (instructions to participants) • Add the dimension of time to resolve problems involving self-reference

  44. Strategies • Study cognition and incorporate what is learned into our understanding of knowledge and epistemology (Heinz von Foerster) • Study high performing research teams (Hollingsworth, Mueller) • Create and use methods for doing second order science

  45. Methods • Model cycles in preferred theories • View first order theories as being part of social control processes • Chart the interaction between ideas and society (e.g., shoelace model) • Create multi-disciplinary descriptions using ideas, groups, events, and variables • Do cross-cultural studies

  46. A key question: Do human activities change systems? • Human beings change social systems by changing laws and theories • As technology improves, human beings are even changing the natural environment – soil, fish, climate • We are learning to think about ourselves as participants in the systems we study • But to do that we need to change our conception of science

  47. Contact Information Prof. Stuart Umpleby Department of Management School of Business George Washington University Washington, DC 20052 USA www.gwu.edu/~umpleby umpleby@gwu.edu

More Related