1 / 23

Thermal boundary conditions for molecular dynamics simulations

A pragmatic approach to. Thermal boundary conditions for molecular dynamics simulations. Simon P.A. Gill and Kenny Jolley Dept. of Engineering University of Leicester, UK. Overview. Imposing a steady state temperature gradient Remote boundary conditions by coarse-graining.

avedis
Télécharger la présentation

Thermal boundary conditions for molecular dynamics simulations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A pragmatic approach to Thermal boundary conditions for molecular dynamics simulations Simon P.A. Gill and Kenny Jolley Dept. of Engineering University of Leicester, UK

  2. Overview • Imposing a steady state temperature gradient • Remote boundary conditions by coarse-graining

  3. Temperaturegradient Heat flux Thermalconductivity T1 temperature Classical model(Ficks law) TN position, x 1.0 Imposing a steady state temperature gradient • Consider a 1D LJ chain of 100 atoms subjected to a different temperature at each end

  4. T(x) T(x) ? T1 T1 T2 T2 x x 1.1 Thermostats • Nosé-Hoover • a global deterministic thermostat • enforces average temperature only • Langevin • a local stochastic thermostat • enforces temperature on each atom • no feedback from actual temperature

  5. 1.2 Results for 1D LJ chain

  6. 1.2 Results for 1D LJ chain • Kapitza effect – boundary conductivity different from bulk conductivity Langevin cannot control temperature in a 1D chain away from equilibrium

  7. Reduced k at boundary for NH k nearly zero at boundary for Langevin 1.3 Boundary effect • Steady state • constant heat flux at all points • Green-Kubo (assuming local equilibrium) Reduce boundary effect using Memory Kernels?

  8. NH : Unphysically large temp gradient maintained at boundary Cooling of 1000 atom LJ chain 1.4 Cooling of Ubiquitin (NAMD)

  9. 1.5 Thermostatting far from equilibrium • Concept – use feedback control loop to regulate temp in centre of chain by thermostating ends boundaryzone boundaryzone { TN T1 { Thermostat at T1c to maintain T1 Thermostat at TNc to maintain TN Controlled region

  10. 1.6 Feedback Control of 1D chain • Algorithm { Thermostat at T1c Adjust T1c to maintain T1 here

  11. in 1D in 2D in 3D. 1.7 Divergence of k • The thermal conductivity of a body with a momentum-conserving potential scales with the system size N as • 3D molecular chain exhibits convergent conductivity • Transverse and longitudinal waves in higher dimensions

  12. 1.8 Feedback control results • 3D rod (8x8x100) • Nosé-Hoover thermostat

  13. 1.9 Feedback control results • Langevin thermostat Langevin can control temperature in 3D but less effective than Nosé-Hoover

  14. 1.10 Feedback control results • Stadium damping thermostat

  15. 1.11 Feedback control results • Temperature distributions

  16. 2.0 Remote boundary conditions by coarse-graining • Some problems are not well represented by : • periodic boundary conditions, particularly where there are long range interactions, e.g. elastic fields in solids • standard ensembles, especially in cases where we are doing work on the system, e.g. NVE, NVT, NPT Work dissipated as heat. Only N is constant

  17. Punch Dynamic atomistic region DOF : positions of atoms, q momenta of atoms, p Elastostatic continuum region DOF : positions of nodes, q temperatures at nodes, T 2.2 Concurrent modelling approach • Do not model dynamics in continuum region

  18. Stadium damping 2.3 Stadium damping • Diffuse thermostatting interface • Proposed by B.L. Holian & R. Ravelo (1995) • Constant temperature simulation embedded in elastostatic FE (Qu, Shastry, Curtin, Miller 2005) • Shown to produce canonical ensemble • Simple solution to phonon reflection problem MD Damping zone

  19. 2.4 Steady State Concurrent model { { Thermostat at T1c to maintain Thermostat at TNc to maintain continuum FD region continuum FD region unthermostatted MD region

  20. 2.5 Steady state FD/MD simulation Nosé-Hoover Stadium damping Blue line is full FD solution Red line is FD at ends (1-20 and 101-120) and MD in middle Blue line is MD boundary zone Red line is FD/MD result

  21. Heat must be conserved on average 2.6 Transient Concurrent model { { Thermostat at T1c to maintain Thermostat at TNc to maintain continuum FD region continuum FD region unthermostatted MD region

  22. 2.6 Transient FD/MD simulation Blue line is full FD solution Red line is FD at ends (1-20 and 101-120) and MD in middle

  23. 3.0 Conclusions • Kapitza boundary effect • conductivity near an interface (real or artificial) is less than bulk value • can obtain desired temperature by feedback control of thermostatted boundary zone. • Thermostats for non-isothermal boundary conditions • deterministic NH thermostat minimizes Kapitza effect • although Langevin naturally thermostats each particle individually.. • ..global NH thermostat determines average temp but not distribution • responsiveness of global NH thermostat depends on no. of thermostatted atoms (important for transient b.c.s) • FD/MD coupling • Stadium damping effectively removes spurious phonon reflection from atomistic/coarse-grained interface • simple matching conditions ensure coupling between continuum and atomistic regions

More Related