1 / 13

Study of Parolees Released in 2005 OPM/CJPPD - Research Unit Presented April 8, 2010 CJPAC

Study of Parolees Released in 2005 OPM/CJPPD - Research Unit Presented April 8, 2010 CJPAC. The 2005 Parolee Study. Using the 2010 Prisoner Recidivism Study as a departure point, CJPPD has begun an analysis of Recidivism among specific offender groups.

avonaco-williams
Télécharger la présentation

Study of Parolees Released in 2005 OPM/CJPPD - Research Unit Presented April 8, 2010 CJPAC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Study of Parolees Released in 2005OPM/CJPPD - Research Unit Presented April 8, 2010 CJPAC

  2. The 2005 Parolee Study • Using the 2010 Prisoner Recidivism Study as a departure point, CJPPD has begun an analysis of Recidivism among specific offender groups. • 2,522 offenders were released to parole during 2005. Using the same datasets we used for the offender study, now we can track parolees, exclusively.

  3. Why parolees? • We do not have a good, macro-level understanding of how parolees perform while they are on supervised parole. • The 2010 Recidivism Report tracked offenders from the date of their first 2005 release. As a result we only captured 1,899 offenders who were released to parole and another 746 who EOS’d from parole. • This study will allow us to track 2,500 parolees from the date of their 2005 release.

  4. The parolees in the study • We know • Where they came from (facility or halfway house) • Where they went (parole office, officer) • Their movements over the next three years • Their criminal histories following release • The study should allow us to gain some new insights into the process. • One limitation – These releases occurred pre-Cheshire. Further study will be required to determine if subsequent structural changes have had a positive impact.

  5. System analysis (1) The graphic represents the 6 major pathways taken by offenders who were released to parole during 2005.

  6. System analysis (2) 1,370 parolees (54%) EOS from parole with no apparent problem.

  7. System analysis (2) Approximately 465 (18%) appear to return with new charges or a new prison sentence.

  8. System analysis (3) Excluding parolees who EOS or return with new sentences or charges, were are left with 488 who returned to prison for Technical Violations and 152 absconders.

  9. System analysis, absconders

  10. System analysis, Tech violators (1)

  11. System analysis, Tech violators (2)

  12. Some questions we intend to address • Recidivism rates by pathway • Sex offenders’ pathways • MH offenders’ pathways • Outcomes by parole office/officer • The halfway house effect • Risk profile: pathways and outcomes

  13. John Forbes, Assistant Division Director John.Forbes@ct.gov Ivan Kuzyk, DirectorCT Statistical Analysis Center Ivan.Kuzyk@ct.gov www.ct.gov/opm/CriminalJustice/Research

More Related