1 / 14

Human Reproductive cloning

Human Reproductive cloning. Professor: Helena Pereira de Melo Student : Manuela Maria Brito April 2014. Clone: Klôn ( twig ) Human Cloning : Therapeutic Cloning Reproductive Cloning Embryo splitting Nuclear transfer. Mithology Religion Science Increase of life expectancy

aya
Télécharger la présentation

Human Reproductive cloning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HumanReproductivecloning Professor: Helena Pereira de Melo Student: Manuela Maria Brito April 2014

  2. Clone: Klôn(twig) • HumanCloning: • TherapeuticCloning • ReproductiveCloning • Embryosplitting • Nuclear transfer

  3. Mithology • Religion • Science • Increase of life expectancy • Progress in medicine and pharmaceutical sciences • Planned parenthood • Medically assisted reproductive technologies

  4. Society • Women’semancipation • Legal abortion • Divorce • Adoption • Same sexmarriage • FamilyParadigm

  5. Is humanity really progressing? • Extreme social inequality • Discrimination • Colonialist spirit • Eugenic ambitions

  6. Are societies as developed as science? Are we ready to fabricate ourselves? • What’s the role of Law?

  7. Willthebenefitsmakeup for therisks? • Infertility cases • To savesomeone’slife(leukaemia) • Negative eugenics • Same sex couples

  8. Risks • Diminish the sense of uniqueness • Division among people (discrimination, slavery, “Girl Babies Group”) • “Racism starts when we say ‘they’re all the same’. For a racist the individual is just a carrier of a pre-belonging.” (Marc Augé) • Positive eugenics • Only affordable to some people • Transformation in family structure • The burden to follow someone else’s path

  9. “It is wiser not to adventure in the cloning techniques, given to the imperfection of those… who are not clones.”(Roger-Pol Droit) • “Shouldn’t we educate people instead?” (Scientists pro cloning)

  10. Theprincipleofhumandignity • Theprincipleof non instrumentalizationofhumanbeings • Kant’s formula: “So act that you use humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means.”

  11. “According to whichcriteriashouldwe decide? Whowill decide, thedoctors, thetechnicians, thesociety, theparents? Whowillbebornandaccording to whichcriteria?” (Nadine Fresco)

  12. Lawframework • 30 countries bannedhumancloning • 15 countries bannedreproductivehumanclonning • 13 North americanstates ban reproductive cloning and 3 states prohibit use of public funds for cloning research • UN • EU • JAPAN CASE

  13. Case • 1.1 A childisdiagnosedwithleukaemiaand there is no “matching” donor. He needs someone with the same genetic material. There is the possibility of cloning him and therefore saving him. Hisparents are lookingforwardraisinganotherchild. • 1.2 A childisdiagnosedwithleukaemiaandhisparents decide to conceive a child in order to savehim. Does thisrespecttheprincipleof non instrumentalization?

More Related