1 / 25

ISCM Sponsor Meeting

ISCM Sponsor Meeting. October 16, 2002 James B. Rice, Jr. Director - Integrated Supply Chain Management Program Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Today’s Agenda. Recap February Key Contact Planning Meeting Choices Recap August AudioConference Update

ayala
Télécharger la présentation

ISCM Sponsor Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ISCM Sponsor Meeting October 16, 2002 James B. Rice, Jr. Director - Integrated Supply Chain Management Program Massachusetts Institute of Technology ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  2. Today’s Agenda • Recap February Key Contact Planning Meeting Choices • Recap August AudioConference Update • Review progress on SC Response to Global Terrorism • GT Team - Deena Disraeli, Don Lowtan, Federico Caniato, Jonathan Fleck, Jim Rice, Yossi Sheffi (unavailable today) • Introduce SC Partners Program • Jonathan Fleck • Program Planning • Jim Rice • Adjourn @ 5:30 pm • Dinner at MIT Faculty Club • Kickoff Auto-ID Event ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  3. Recap February Key Contact Meeting • Developed plans for 2002 • Events • Identified dates, locations • Research • Funding for Yossi Sheffi & SC Response to Global Terrorism • Began ‘Harvesting Discussion’ • Harvesting is at the heart of sponsors leveraging benefit from investment in our work • Financial Plans • Group agreed to the need for additional funding from new sponsors ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  4. Harvesting Discussion • Initiated by Jim Kellso of Intel • Recognized as important topic for the entire group • Harvesting represents the process for the ISCM sponsors to take the learnings from our research and exchange and apply them within the sponsor firms • IEEE Harvesting Paper Authored by Joe and Jim • “A Job Fit For Evel Knievel: Jumping the Canyon of Academia-to-Industry Knowledge Transfer” • What are the known best practices for harvesting? • From research investments • From events • From exchange with other sponsors/companies • Consider new ways to harvest using technology (WebEx, NetMeeting?) ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  5. Harvesting Research • We need a quorum to have a meaningful discussion about this topic • We will plan time for this at the next ISCM event • See following slides for reference back to the origins of the discussion • This topic gets at the heart of ISCM and the potential value for sponsors • Basically, how can our sponsors and ISCM harvest the research learnings for application? ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  6. Harvesting: Meeting Comments • Want to change the way that the company does business based on what we learn here (from the research and events) • Have had to ‘go underground’ to do the work without the support of the business unit, but the results are not supported • How can we get the results embedded into the company? Some suggestions: • Recognize that the research can create some ideas that are part of an evolution (JRo) • Have Charlie Fine do a Clockspeed session to lead the change (JB) • Create a ‘Strategy to action’ team that studies and plans how to move good ideas into execution (JK) • Identify the purpose and objectives of the research, use that to drive how the learnings are built into the business (JK) • Success that previous key contact created at Intel was by enlisting support from non-SBU personnel (JK) • Corporate organization leads with investment, provide incentives ($, resources) for SBUs to adopt it (BS)… ‘resource sharing’ • Corporate maintains some standard processes and expectations that should be followed by SBUs, if not penalties are assessed (JB) • Have researchers make site visits (BS) • Engage the SBUs by giving them input to direction-setting, provide corporate resources that are made available to SBUs to utilize the research… (BS, RM) • Obstacles – no single business owner, there are many parties involved, research not involved with ‘today’s solution’ ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  7. Recap August AudioConference Update • Update some changes at the Center • Center name and leadership • ISCM Director Role Change • New initiatives • SC Education Partners • SC Response to Global Terrorism Research Project ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  8. Changes at our Center • New name: Center for Transportation and Logistics • Center for Transportation Studies did not reflect breadth of our work in logistics and supply chain • It only took 10 years! • New leadership • Now have two Co-Directors • Prof. Yossi Sheffi • Prof. Cindy Barnhart • Yossi will be on sabbatical 9-02 through 6-03 in the UK • Impact of these changes? • Limited direct impact on ISCM • Name change communicates our focus more effectively, potentially making ‘marketing’ more productive ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  9. Changes for ISCM • Jim Rice will take on running APIL in addition to ISCM • APIL – Affiliates Program in Logistics: a CTL consortium that hosts a series of executive educational events for members • ISCM and APIL will share some common events • May ISCM event was an example of this • 1 day with ISCM and APIL sponsors, 1 day with ISCM only • ISCM will have some completely separate events • Impact on ISCM? • ISCM Director’s work is more coordination, less personal research • Cost of Director now shared with APIL, meaning more funds to support ISCM research • But we still need to build the base funding level ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  10. SC Response to Global Terrorism ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  11. SC Response to Global Terrorism • ISCM agreed to fund this work • Pending available funding • Work To-Date • Largely started late summer, fast start Sept. 1 • SC Response to GT Team started up early Sept., 2002 • Focusing on response from Government, Risk Mgt/Insurance Industry, Corporations, and learning from past disasters • In progress of developing ‘Situation Scan’ to be completed end of Oct. 2002 • Today we share our work in-progress and solicit input and feedback • Next steps • Develop refined research questions to penetrate • Identify methodology to utilize in various domains ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  12. SC Response: Researcher Updates • Deena Disraeli • Government Response • Don Lowtan • Risk Mgt and Insurance Industry Response • Federico Caniato • Corporate Response • Discussion ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  13. ISCM Program Planning ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  14. ISCM Program Planning • 2002 Events • Dec. 4 – ISCM Key Contacts Planning Meeting • Dec. 5 – SC Response to Global Terrorism Symposium • Dec. 6 – SC Response to GT Initiative Discussion • 2003 Preliminary Planning • ISCM Meeting at Intel in 1Q 2003? • Clockspeed Project • Communications Industry Roadmap Initiative • New Case Requests • Search for opportunities • Review your SC issues… a la Monsanto Seed ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  15. Dec. 5 Symposium: SC Response to GT • Three sections • Situation Scan • Government Response • Corporate Response • Speakers include • MIT • MIT President Chuck Vest, Prof. Yossi Sheffi (CTL), MIT Institute Prof. John Deutch (ex-CIA chief), Prof. Richard DeNeufville (Sloan, Real Options & SC Design) • Industry • Steve Lund – Intel Corporate Security Americas • Bob Bergstrom – UPS VP • Government & Others Invited include • Commandant of US Coast Guard, CEO BT Wholesale, EAD FBI Counterterrorism Division, Director of National Infrastructure Protection Center, Director of US Customs ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  16. 2003 Preliminary Planning • 1st Quarter Meeting Plans • Dates, Venue, Topic • Balance of 2003? • Dates, Topics • Theme for 2003? • Research Projects to Engage • SC Response to Global Terrorism • Clockspeed • Seeking new sponsor cases ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  17. Program Planning Reference Slides ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  18. Events – Evolution of process & purpose • 1995-1997 • Focused on learning about the sponsor supply chains (supply chain reviews at sponsor sites) • 1998 • Shifted to theme-based, topic-focused (plan, make, source, deliver) events targeted to non-supply chain groups • Focused on sharing learnings among sponsors, identifying best practices on several supply chain topics • 1999 • Shifted to topic-focused events on mixture of supply chain and business management topics, leverage events with other MIT consortia and research groups, open discussion sessions • No central theme identified, sponsor-driven event topics • 2000-2001 • Events and audioconferences to balance travel & interactions • Heavier emphasis on research ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  19. 2002 ISCM Event Schedule February 5-6 ISCM Key Contact Planning Meeting 2001 Research Review and 2002 Research/Event Planning May 20-21 Joint ISCM & Affiliates Program in Logistics Symposium “New Era of Customer Service Management” May 21-22 ISCM Research Review and Best Practices Collaborative Meeting at MIT October 16-17 Joint ISCM & Affiliates Program in Logistics Symposium “Auto-ID Technology: Defining Logistics Applications” December 3-4 ISCM Key Contact Planning Meeting 2002 Research Review and 2003 Research/Event Planning December 5 Joint ISCM & Affiliates Program in Logistics Symposium “Supply Chain Response to Global Terrorism” ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  20. 2002 ISCM Support Activities Schedule January 9-10 Affiliates Program in Logistics Symposium “Dynamic Pricing in the Supply Chain” August 22 ISCM AudioConference – ISCM Sponsors Program Update December 12 Guest Speaker Symposium Warren Bennis MIT ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  21. 2001 ISCM Event Schedule February 1 ISCM Best Practices Collaborative Meeting at MIT “Innovations in Sponsor Supply Chains” February 2 Joint ISCM - Leaders for Manufacturing Program at MIT LFM Intern Research Knowledge Review June 19-20 eClockspeed Research Visit to Helix (Prof. Charlie Fine) ISCM Exchange Meeting & Research Review at MIT Oct. 30 “Innovations in Supply Chains” ISCM Event Hosted by P&G, Cincinnati, Ohio (P&G’s Consumer Innovation Center) Oct. 31 sClockspeed Research Visit to P&G Prof. Charlie Fine & Customer Service Supply Chain ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  22. 2001 ISCM Support Activities Schedule February 20 ISCM AudioConference Review of Innovations by ISCM Sponsors (Intel) March 1 Clockspeed Research Visit to Siemens Prof. Charlie Fine May 14 Supply Network Coordination Symposium Sponsored by KLICT Research – The Netherlands May 15 ISCM AudioConference Prof. Ellen Christiaanse – Univ. of Amsterdam “From Static Supply Chains to Dynamic Supply Webs” Nov 2 ISCM AudioConference “Global Terrorism and the Impact on Supply Chain Mgt” Prof. Yossi Sheffi, Prof Barry Posen, and Dr. Jonathan Byrnes ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  23. 2000 ISCM Event Schedule January 27-28 “Managing Change in the Supply Chain” and Leaders For Manufacturing (LFM) Knowledge Review June 12-13 “Future of Supply Chain, E-Business and the Internet ISCM Event Hosted by Intel, Chandler, Az. (Fine - MIT, Lee - Stanford, Cohen - Wharton) Sept. 13-15 ISCM Research Review and Workshop Research Colloquium with LFM Nov. 28-29 ISCM 2001 - Program Planning Sponsor Key Contacts & MIT Researchers ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  24. 2000 ISCM Support Activities Schedule February 15 ISCM AudioConference ‘eClockspeed’ Project Planning – Prof. Charlie Fine April 18 ISCM AudioConference “Smart Practice Knowledge Network” – Lucent Tech. “Fireball Initiative” – P&G June 1 Research Visit to P&G – Prof. Charlie Fine June 5 Research Visit to Lucent – Prof. Charlie Fine October 17 ISCM AudioConference Dr. Fred Hewitt – MIT CISR “Why Demand Pipelines are better that Supply Chains” ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

  25. Consortia Current Best Practices • Take active role giving input on deployment of Director • Deploy to meaningful work that sponsors desire • Play a role in recruiting • Peer companies • Suppliers, customers, service providers • Provide contacts, introduce to other party, identify a desirable outcome from having the other party join ISCM • Engage broad set of parties at your firm • Participation in ISCM events • Participation in ISCM research • Connect with and explore possibilities with researchers ©MIT jrice@mit.edu

More Related