1 / 6

Education for All Working Group Third Meeting Group 4: Assessing progress - bridging the data gap

Education for All Working Group Third Meeting Group 4: Assessing progress - bridging the data gap. Two objectives. To assist national policy making Allow assessment of progress towards the Dakar goals for all countries

ayanna
Télécharger la présentation

Education for All Working Group Third Meeting Group 4: Assessing progress - bridging the data gap

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Education for All Working Group Third Meeting Group 4: Assessing progress - bridging the data gap

  2. Two objectives • To assist national policy making • Allow assessment of progress towards the Dakar goals for all countries Note: Tension between building sustainable data collection systems in country and provision of timely data internationally

  3. International level: Areas where progress could be made  Agree a set of core indicators to be used by all international organizations (cost – partial picture not always useful at national level)  Recognise that data collection is expensive (Some felt strongly that donors should fund.)  Make better use of existing data (e.g., where possible make more use of survey data to complete administrative data)

  4. Country level  Recognise that priorities for data needs change over time (e.g., Bangladesh – learning time very important)  Make great use of qualitative measures  Build upon existing databases  Need for independent verification

  5. Possible Action following EFA Working Group Meeting  Greater agreement on core indicators internationally – Need to ang heads together (UIS to convene?)  Greater donor funding for data collection (e.g., Put aside percentage of Fast Track spending for this purpose – USAID to pursue?)  Encourage establishment of independent verification at country level – could be done by education specific bodies or general statistical bodies (To be discussed at country level)

  6.  Try to get richer data to complete core indicators in some countries • Use more innovative approaches to inform us or e.g., gender / HIV/AIDS issues • (Not clear who would do this.)

More Related