480 likes | 621 Vues
Incident Detection: MacGyver Style. Ben Jackson, Mayhemic Labs SOURCEBoston April 18 th , 2012. Agenda. Improving the Kill Chain Moving on from Prevention Finding Data in Unexpected Places Canaries, Claymores, and Labyrinths Simple Anomaly Detection
E N D
Incident Detection:MacGyver Style Ben Jackson, Mayhemic Labs SOURCEBoston April 18th, 2012
Agenda • Improving the Kill Chain • Moving on from Prevention • Finding Data in Unexpected Places • Canaries, Claymores, and Labyrinths • Simple Anomaly Detection Thoughts expressed here are neither the opinions or beliefs of my employer.
Kill Chain • The “Kill Chain” • Developed by the United States Air Force to describe the concept of target identification, force dispatch to target, decision and order to attack the target, and finally the destruction of the target.
Kill Chain • Find – Locate the Target • Fix – Identify the Target • Track – Watch the Target • Target - Determine Strategy • Engage – Eliminate the Target • Assess – Determine if it worked
Things that we’re good at… • Find • Fix • Track • Target • Engage • Assess
Things that we’re not good at… • Find • Fix • Track • Target • Engage • Assess
Prevention is a dirty word • Stop focusing on prevention • Right now, your environment is getting attacked with malware made earlier today • Plus, it hasn’t even been submitted to your AV vendor • You aren’t going to prevent that • Prevention should be part of your strategy, and not your strategy itself
How bad are we? • Verizon DBIR sums it up • 92% of all data breach incidents were discovered by a third party • 85% of all breaches took three or more weeks to discover • Both of these figures were up 6% from last year • Let’s face it, we’re doing it wrong
How can we improve? • Lots of excuses: • “I don’t have tools” • “I don’t have manpower” • “I don’t have a budget” • “It’s too difficult” Go cry, emo CISO
Solution TRY HARDER
I know what you’re thinking… • But hear me out!
Detection is the new black • Accept you are going to get compromised • Liberating, isn’t it? • Let’s work on rapidly detecting compromises when they happen
Let’s do it MacGyver Style! • Watched far too much MacGyver in my formative years • When faced with an impossible task: • Take stock of your tools • Analyze • Work the problem • Improvise • Be sure to carry a swiss army knife • Or in my case, multi-tool
Data: It’s freaking everywhere • Some background • In my previous life, I was a developer in public health statistics • “Diet Bioinformatics” • Firm believer in thinking by the numbers • With enough data, you can rule the world • I, for one, welcome our new Google overlords
Data: It’s freaking everywhere • Data is in places that you wouldn’t expect • Your network keeps information just to run smoothly • Let’s use that data to find abnormal behavior
Case Study • Wayback Machine set for March 2010 • Problem: Difficult to use blacklists to check traffic to malware sites • Firewall logs available, but far too many sites to check • Equivalent to trying to identify needles in a very large haystack. Plus, some of the needles may not actually be there.
Solution: DNS Scraping • Didn’t care about the sites users weren’t visiting • Only cared about ones they were visiting • Figured by leveraging blacklists and non recursive DNS lookups, it could be determined what sites other hosts were querying
Phase 3: Profit! • If someone was querying a blacklisted site, further research was required • The number of sites that needed to be searched was cut down from 2000+ to 5 or less • This was awesome • Mostly because I’m lazy
It’s far from perfect • DNS records with extremely low time to live (TTL) values give us a very small window to locate them • Fast flux can be as low as 5 seconds • Number of queries can total to over 10000 • More DNS servers? More queries • But, better then nothing!
This statement is false! • Everyone gets annoyed at false positives • Anti Malware Software • Intrusion Prevention Systems • Everyone should be worried about false negatives • What’s happening in your network that isn’t being detected? • More importantly, how do we detect it?
Old and busted: Honeypots • Honeypots are great • They provide great information for researchers • Honeypots also are bad • Lots of risk, little reward • They’re a time suck to maintain • Thankfully, you never needed to worry about patching them
New Hotness: Canaries • Somewhat like honeypots • Well monitored • Extremely permissive • No one should be using them • Only not… • Fully patched • Not designed to be compromised • Not externally facing
The best of both worlds • Give you an early warning for scans within the environment • Fully patched and managed, so less likely to get compromised • Unless someone drops some 0 day • Permissive and monitored, so if someone pokes at it, you know
Canaries aren’t just computers • Pen Testers <3 Rogue APs • OK, let’s give an attacker a rogue AP • Unencrypted • Default SSID • Merrily handing out DHCP addresses • Log everything
claymore.py • Runs on a computer set up to broadcast as a rogue AP • Upon handing out a DHCP address, runs a port scan on the client computer • Generates an alert message and mails it along with the scan to an e-mail address.
What good does it do? • Primarily captures two kinds of people • Bad Actors • “Curious” Users • Either way, folks you would want to know are trying to poke around • This can provide as little or as much access at you want
Do ye seek a grail? • Anomaly detection is the holy grail of analysts • Also incredibly hard to do • What is “normal” for your network? • More importantly, are we sure what this is normal is actually normal? • Are we owned already?
Do ye seek a grail? Maybe not… • Works great on paper • My SQL Server should only be doing SQL Server-y things • However, not to much in practice • Wait, why is that SQL server FTPing out to Sweden? • Oh… Anti-Virus update… • Or worse, it’s using a CDN to grab software updates
Let’s adjust the goalposts • However, let’s try to apply this to other areas • Where does your user base surf to on an average day? • Both work related and non-work related • Does it really change that much? • People like routines
The stuff we know is bad Err… The stuff we know is good The good, the bad, and the…
Devious Deviations • Deviations from the baseline will give “interesting” stuff • The “Good” • Legitimate traffic (Shopping, Research, etc) • The “Bad” • Exploit Kits, Crimeware, BlackHat SEO • The “Ugly” • Errr… “Not work safe” material
Why reinvent the wheel? • Marcus Ranum created “NBS” in 2003 • “Never Before Seen” • Simple tool that implements something that we’re still trying to get done correctly today • “If we’ve never seen it before, by definition… it’s an anomaly” • Seen it before? No? Log it.
Network NBS • Let’s apply that to network events • Has that event happened before? • No? Log it! • Analysis is left to be done by the analyst • Only you will know what is normal for your network
Oko • Simple framework to detect “never before seen” network events • Currently processes firewall and DHCP events • Next up: Proxy and DNS • Something we haven’t seen? Alert to syslog • Named after the Soviet ICBM early warning system
Some shortcomings • Doesn’t provide any context • You’re on your own, bub • Lights up like a Christmas tree for abnormal, but authorized activity • New server? PANIC! • All the data extraction from logs is left to you • Handles JSON via ZeroMQ
In summary… • There are lots of bits out there on your network, harness them to your advantage • Use these techniques in your own environment • Remember, when faced with an impossible task, inventory your tools…
Ur Feedback, I haz it? http://www.surveymonkey.com/sourceboston12
Contact Info Ben Jackson e-Mail: bbj@mayhemiclabs.com Twitter: @innismir Web/Code: http://mayhemiclabs.com