1 / 17

Connectivity Improvement for Inter-Domain Routing in MANETs

Connectivity Improvement for Inter-Domain Routing in MANETs. You Lu, Biao Zhou, Ian Ku, Mario Gerla UCLA {youlu, zhb, ianku, gerla}@cs.ucla.edu. 1. Outline. Introduction & Previous Work Geo-based Inter-Domain Routing Protocol New Features Balanced Gateway Election Neighbor Priority

baris
Télécharger la présentation

Connectivity Improvement for Inter-Domain Routing in MANETs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Connectivity Improvement for Inter-Domain Routing in MANETs You Lu, Biao Zhou, Ian Ku, Mario Gerla UCLA {youlu, zhb, ianku, gerla}@cs.ucla.edu 1

  2. Outline • Introduction & Previous Work • Geo-based Inter-Domain Routing Protocol • New Features • Balanced Gateway Election • Neighbor Priority • Gateway Connectivity Improvements • Geo-Routing increased efficient • Reduced Control Overhead • Performance Evaluation • Conclusions 2

  3. Introduction 3

  4. Previous Work Group Mobility One Clusterhead per Group Clusterheads periodically advertise member list Gr A LISTA B LISTB Advertisements propagate via dissemination

  5. Previous Work Geo-based Inter-Domain Routing Protocol Geo-Routing: • Greedy Forwarding or • Direction Forwarding • used when Greedy gets stuck • exploits Cluster Head advertisements 5

  6. New Feature #1: Balanced Gateway Election • Balance between Neighbor’s Number and Neighbor’s Distribution Table 1 Neighbors in different Domains 6

  7. New Feature # 2: Reliable Neighbor Priority 7

  8. Improvements to GIDR 8

  9. Performance Evaluation • Simulation Parameters • Simulator: Qualnet 4.5 • Data traffic: CBR, pkt size 512 byte, pkt interval 0.25s • Dimension: 1000m × 1000m • Mobility model: RPGM • Each node in a domain has a common group motion component. In addition, each node has an individual intra-group motion component • intra-group speed: 0-5m/s • pause time is 10 seconds • Simulation Time: 1000s • PHY/MAC protocol: 802.11b • Metric: Packet Delivery Ratio & Normalized Control Overhead 9

  10. Packet Delivery Ratio vs. Node Velocity 10

  11. Normalized Control Overhead vs. Node Velocity 11

  12. Packet Delivery Ratio vs. Gateway Percentage 12

  13. Normalized Control Overhead vs. Gateway Percentage 13

  14. Packet Delivery Ratio vs. Number of Domain 14

  15. Normalized Control Overhead vs. Number of Domain 15

  16. Conclusions • I-GIDR Features • Proposed a new gateway election that accounts for both the gateway’s neighbor number and neighbor distribution • Concept of Neighbor Priority • Gateway Connectivity Improvements • Geo-Routing increased efficient • Reduced Control Overhead 16

  17. Thanks Q & A 17

More Related