1 / 112

Survey and Field Research in Finance: Miscalibration and Corporate Actions

April 15, 2005 Yale University. Survey and Field Research in Finance: Miscalibration and Corporate Actions. Campbell R. Harvey Duke University, Durham, NC USA National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA USA. Survey and Field Research Background.

Télécharger la présentation

Survey and Field Research in Finance: Miscalibration and Corporate Actions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. April 15, 2005 Yale University Survey and Field Research in Finance:Miscalibration and Corporate Actions Campbell R. Harvey Duke University, Durham, NC USA National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA USA

  2. Survey and Field ResearchBackground • In 1995, Duke and Financial Executives International make a deal to conduct a quarterly CFO survey • The deal allows for some special ‘academic’ surveys outside of the quarterly survey that would use the FEI e-mail and fax list

  3. Survey and Field ResearchBackground 1. Graham and Harvey conduct a survey on capital structure and project evaluation • “Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance: Evidence from the Field” appears in JFE 2001 2. Brav, Graham, Harvey & Michaely survey on dividend and repurchase policy • “Payout Policy in the 21st Century” forthcoming in JFE 2005

  4. Survey and Field ResearchBackground 3. Graham, Harvey and Rajgopal, survey on corporate financial reporting and disclosure. • “The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting” 4. Graham and Harvey, quarterly survey on risk premium • “Expectations, Optimism, and Overconfidence”

  5. Survey and Field ResearchPlan • “Methodology” in the true sense of the term • Asset pricing • Measuring expectations (mean, variance, skew), optimism, overconfidence. • Corporate Finance • Understanding corporate financial reporting

  6. Survey and Field ResearchMethodology

  7. Survey and Field Research “Methodology” General goals our research program: • To learn what people say they believe • To examine assumptions • To provide a complement to the usual research methods: archival empirical work and theory

  8. Survey and Field Research“Methodology” Approach sharply contrasts with Friedman’s (1953) “The Methodology of Positive Economics” • Goals of positive science are predictive • Don’t reject theory based on “unrealistic assumptions” • Also, rejects notion that all the predictions of a theory matter to its validity – goal is “narrow predictive success”

  9. Survey and Field Research“Methodology” Alternative view, Daniel Hausman (1992) • “No good way to know what to try when a prediction fails or whether to employ a theory in a new application without judging its assumptions”

  10. Survey and Field ResearchAsset Pricing

  11. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations Key asset pricing theories relate expected returns to “risk” • Expected returns are never observed • Variances and covariances are never observed

  12. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations Many asset pricing theories also postulate the existence of the representative agent, i.e. there is no disagreement • Recent research has made some progress both theoretically (heterogeneous expectations) and empirically (modeling disagreement) • Disagreement proxy of choice is the I/B/E/S standard deviation of analysts’ forecasts

  13. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations Many asset pricing tests rely on a rational expectations argument • Empirical models of expectations • Average returns (unconditional expectations) • Linear projection (conditional expectations) • ARCH/GARCH weighted average of past squared return surprises (which embeds an expectation of the return) • Skewness extremely difficult to measure

  14. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Measurement • Survey CFOs every quarter • Q2 2000 through Q1 2005 (20 quarters) • 200+ responses per quarter (4,346 total observations) • We have other data back to Q3 1996 • Why CFOs? • We have access to CFOs • We know from previous surveys and interviews that part of their job is to try to understand both the market and their stock’s performance relative to the market • Should not be biased the way that analyst forecasts might be

  15. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Measurement

  16. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Mean

  17. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Mean

  18. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Mean Determinants –Persistence of Expectations

  19. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Mean Determinants –Persistence of Expectations

  20. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Mean Determinants –Extrapolation of Past Returns

  21. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Mean Determinants –Extrapolation of Past Returns

  22. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Mean Determinants –Extrapolation of Past Returns

  23. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Mean Determinants –Expectations of Fundamentals

  24. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Mean Determinants –Expectations of Fundamentals

  25. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Mean Determinants –Expectations of Risk

  26. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Volatility • We measure two components of volatility • Individual volatility • Disagreement among individuals

  27. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Volatility • Market volatility Var[r]= E[Var(r|Z)] + Var(E[r|Z]) average vol. + disagreement vol. • Individual volatilities (Davidson and Cooper) Variance = {[r(0.90) - r(0.10)]/2.65}2

  28. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Disagreement Volatility

  29. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Individual Volatility

  30. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Total Volatility

  31. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Volatility determinants –Persistence of expectations

  32. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Volatility determinants –Persistence of expectations

  33. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Volatility determinants –Persistence of expectations

  34. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Volatility determinants –Influence of past returns (Individual vol)

  35. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Volatility determinants –Influence of past returns (Disagreement vol)

  36. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Volatility determinants –Influence of past returns (Disagreement vol)

  37. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Volatility determinants –Fundamentals (Individual vol)

  38. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Volatility determinants –Fundamentals (Disagreement vol)

  39. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Volatility determinants –Fundamentals (Total vol)

  40. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Volatility determinants –Risk measures (Individual)

  41. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Volatility determinants –Risk measures (Disagreement)

  42. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Volatility determinants –Risk measures (Total)

  43. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Individual Skewness

  44. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Disagreement Skewness

  45. Survey and Field ResearchExpectations: Skewness determinants–Influence of past returns (Disagreement skewness)

  46. Survey and Field ResearchOptimism • Will be measured as the mean difference between the expected returns and the realized returns • Notice that we have no way to calibrate the quality of the expected returns – given the “true” expected return is unobservable • We can only make inference about forecasting ability

  47. Survey and Field ResearchOptimism Returns forecasting ability

  48. Survey and Field ResearchOptimism Returns bias (Average=10% per annum)

  49. Survey and Field ResearchOptimism

  50. Survey and Field ResearchOptimism

More Related