1 / 11

Valuing E-Portfolios:  Formative and Summative Assessment

Valuing E-Portfolios:  Formative and Summative Assessment. Jane Moore, National-Louis University David Wicks, Seattle Pacific University.

bcapone
Télécharger la présentation

Valuing E-Portfolios:  Formative and Summative Assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Valuing E-Portfolios:  Formative and Summative Assessment Jane Moore, National-Louis UniversityDavid Wicks, Seattle Pacific University

  2. E-Portfolios have become the norm in teacher education programs.  How can we make them meaningful, integrated and valuable to both students and faculty members? Initial response to a requirement for electronic portfolios can be overwhelming.  Both students and faculty members often need to be convinced of the value of this time-consuming and reflective process.  This session gives a practical framework for developing a successful electronic portfolio practice.

  3. Portfolio Content and Structure - reflections - artifacts

  4. Contact Information • Jane Moore jmoore@nl.edu • David Wicks dwicks@spu.edu

  5. Artifacts, Reflections & Rubrics

  6. Students valuing process • Opportunity to engage in reflective practice • Chance to look at a body of work which reflects effort and understanding throughout the program • Capstone project

  7. Student Training • Part of first core course – both technical and philosophical • Portfolio system is used as course management tool (National) • Online help and tutorial, telephone, email

  8. Faculty valuing process • How is work divided? Portfolio assessment tied to a course or assigned faculty load • Anonymous or known reviewer? • Who can assess? Adjuncts and/or Full-time faculty

  9. Faculty Training • In department meetings • Just in Time • Shadowing • Inter-rater reliability • Guidelines • Power users provide help

  10. Administration • Top down due to accreditation requirements • Issues • Making load time for assessments • Assessment director vs. Assessment council • Taking ownership of rubrics and standards

  11. Big questions • Can we keep it meaningful without it becoming unmanageable? • Have we sacrificed meaning for manageability?

More Related