1 / 36

Learning Well Evaluation Year 6 Report 2006-2007

Learning Well Evaluation Year 6 Report 2006-2007. Evaluation Team. Terrell W. Zollinger, Dr.P.H. Epidemiologist & Biostatistician Robert M. Saywell, Jr., Ph.D., M.P.H. Health Economist Komal Kochhar, M.B.B.S., M.H.A. Clinician & Health Administrator Christina A. Mandzuk, B.S.E .

Télécharger la présentation

Learning Well Evaluation Year 6 Report 2006-2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Learning Well EvaluationYear 6 Report2006-2007

  2. Evaluation Team • Terrell W. Zollinger, Dr.P.H. • Epidemiologist & Biostatistician • Robert M. Saywell, Jr., Ph.D., M.P.H. • Health Economist • Komal Kochhar, M.B.B.S., M.H.A. • Clinician & Health Administrator • Christina A. Mandzuk, B.S.E. • Senior Research Assistant

  3. Data Sources • Clinic Services (Welligent) Student Surveys 205,384 (5,351 in 2001) 483 (104 in 2001) • Parent SurveysClinic Staff Surveys 118 (34 in 2001) 35 (6 in 2001) • School Faculty/Staff SurveysClinic Activity Logs 307 (134 in 2001) 342 (107 in 2001) • Students Provided with Clinic Services 20,967

  4. Overview • Learning Well Description and Trends • Clinical Services Provided in 2006-2007 • Achievement of Learning Well Objectives

  5. Clinics Supported by Learning Well 14 Nurse Practitioner Model Clinics (10 in 2001-2002) 42 Basic Health Services Model Clinics (0 in 2001-2002) 19 Outreach Clinics (Feeder Schools)

  6. Learning Well Schools: 75 High Schools (4 in 2001) • 15 (9-12) • 1 (K-12)* • 2 (6-12)* Middle Schools (6 in 2001) • 25 (6-8) • 1 (K-12)* • 2 (6-12)* • 4 (K-8)* Elementary Schools (0 in 2001) • 24 (K-5) • 1 (K-12)* • 4 (K-8)* * Seven schools have a combination of elementary (4), middle (2), or high (1), hence have been counted in each category

  7. Penetration Rates • Over one-third (37.1%) of IPS students had access to a Learning Well school-based clinic (vs. 37.7% in 2005-2006) • One-fifth (19.7%) of all Marion County children (5-17 years) had access to a Learning Well school-based clinic (vs. 17.9% in 2005-2006) • Over one-half (55.2%) of the students in Learning Well schools visited the school-based clinics (vs. 56.7% in 2005-2006)

  8. Clinical Services Provided: 2006-2007

  9. Clinic Events 205,384 in 2006-2007 122,319 in 2005-2006 74,910 in 2004-2005 53,862 in 2003-2004 18,951 in 2002-2003 5,351 in 2001-2002 Over 200,000 increase from 2001-2007

  10. Grade of Clinic Users

  11. Gender of Clinic Users

  12. Race/Ethnicity of Clinic Users

  13. Complexity of Clinic Visit

  14. Top 10 reasons for visit • Headache • Vaccines • Counseling • Pain • Skin Disorders • Medical Exams • Behavioral Health Problems • Pharyngitis/Tonsilitis/Sinusitis • Screenings • Menstrual Disorders

  15. Top 3 Health Promotions Procedures & Counseling’s Health Promotions Procedures • Temperature • Cold Pack • WoundCleaning/Bandaging Health Promotions Counseling • Health • Hygiene • Nutrition

  16. Top 3 Immunizations, Referrals & Laboratory Services ImmunizationsReferrals Hepatitis B Primary Care Flu Eye IPV Other Laboratory Services • Urinalysis (UA) Dip • Strep – Rapid • Pregnancy Test- Urine

  17. Regular Source of Primary Care • 78.0% of students had a primary care provider • Utilization • 32.2% had been admitted to a hospital in the past year • 33.6% were treated in an Emergency Room or Urgent Care Center in the past year

  18. Achievement of Learning Well Objectives2006-2007

  19. Learning Well Goals • Goal I: Address Barriers to Health Care Access • Goal II: Provide Health Care Knowledge • Goal III: Address Attitudinal Barriers • Goal IV: Address Clinic Provider Issues

  20. Goal I: Address Barriers to Health Care Access • Address economic barriers • 19.8% of parents indicated they would NOT be able to pay for their child’s medical services if the clinic were not here

  21. Goal I, continued • Convenient location for health care services • 100.0% of parents and 95.4% of students agreed • Convenient hours for health care services • 100% of parents and 93.3% of students agreed

  22. Goal I, continued • If the clinic were not here, where would parents take their child if he/she had a minor illness before leaving for school:

  23. Goal I, continued • If the clinic were not here, where would parents take their child if he/she had a minor illness while in school:

  24. Goal II: Provide Health Care Knowledge • Provide awareness of the value of preventive medicine • Parents: 82.9% schedule a regular check up for their child each year • Students:36.3% visit the clinic to get health information even when not sick • Teachers: 57.9% VERY appropriate and 38.2% SOMEWHAT appropriatefor children to miss class to visit the clinic for preventive care

  25. Goal II, continued • Provide knowledge of self-care and preventive care • Do the parents and students know how to keep healthy?

  26. Goal II, continued • Increase awareness of clinic services • Do the parents and students know what services are available at the clinic?

  27. Goal II, continued • Increase awareness of community health resources • Do the parents and students know where to get health services, other than the clinic?

  28. Goal III: Address Attitudinal Barriers • Provide a comfortable setting for health care • Parents: 97.4% indicated they were comfortable with their children receiving health care at the clinic • Students:96.9% indicated they were comfortable receiving health care at the clinic

  29. Goal III, continued • Address the value of health care • How often is a regular medical check up scheduled, when child is sick/not sick?

  30. Goal III, continued • Address the perception of the need for care • Parents: 96.6% were VERY comfortable and 3.4% were SOMEWHAT comfortable deciding when to seek medical care for their child

  31. Goal IV: Address Clinic Provider Issues, continued • Are your child’s physical health needs being met at the clinic?

  32. Goal IV, continued • Are your child’s mental health needs being met at the clinic?

  33. Health and School Performance • 89.1% students believed their school performance • 87.3% students believed their health • 84.7% students believed their grades ….had either improved or were the same compared to one year ago

  34. Conclusions

  35. Part I • Increased number of schools and students served • High risk children – • 32% hospitalized • 34% have ER visits • Parents and children highly satisfied

  36. Part II • Students more likely to go to school and stay in school for minor illnesses • Parents and children only somewhat knowledgeable about preventive health care • Parents feel their children’s physical health needs are generally being met, but not their mental health needs

More Related