60 likes | 158 Vues
Explore improved algorithms critical for automated analysis in enzymatic reactions, biological pathways, and chemical kinetic mechanisms, ensuring database consistency. Formulate mappings with minimum cost using innovative methods. Experimental results confirm efficiency.
E N D
Improved Algorithms for Reaction Mapping John Crabtree, Dinesh Mehta, Thomas McKinnon, Anthony Dean Colorado School of Mines
Atomic Reaction Mapping • Critical for the automated analysis of: • Enzymatic Reactions • Biological Pathways • Chemical Kinetic Mechanisms • Reaction Classification • Database Consistency Checking
Problem Formulation • R1 + … + Rn <=> P1 + … + Pm • Reaction mapping • Let v = vertex in reactant graph • Let w = vertex in product graph • Mapping: w1 = f(v1), w2 = f(v2) • Cost c(v1, v2) = 0 same bond state between w1, w2 • Cost c(v1, v2) = 1 different state between w1, w2 • Number of bonds formed/broken • Given a valid chemical reaction, obtain a mapping of minimum cost.
Cut Successive Largest • Complexity is O(n2) x (complexity of naming) • Guaranteed to be efficient • Can add chemical rules
Fewest Bonds First • CHCO + CHCO <=> CO + CO + CHCH • 11 bonds • 00000000001 00000000010 etc • Search all bit patterns in order of min cost • Theorem: Given a valid chemical equation, FBF will produce a mathematically optimal mapping.
Experimental Results • Gas Research Institute GRI-Mech 3.0 • 325 Reactions; CSL 94% 2sec; FBF 100% 15sec • KEGG / Ligand over 5,000 reactions