1 / 7

Session III National Implementation of the GSBPM

Session III National Implementation of the GSBPM. METIS Workshop October 5-7 2011. Session organization. Presentations by: Sweden: Mats Bergdahl, Klas Blomqvist Canada: Alice Born, Tim Dunstan Denmark: Grosen Nielsen, Lars Thygesen Korea: Chanil Seo Interactive panel discussion

beckm
Télécharger la présentation

Session III National Implementation of the GSBPM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Session IIINational Implementation of the GSBPM METIS WorkshopOctober 5-7 2011

  2. Session organization • Presentations by: • Sweden: Mats Bergdahl, Klas Blomqvist • Canada: Alice Born, Tim Dunstan • Denmark: Grosen Nielsen, Lars Thygesen • Korea: Chanil Seo • Interactive panel discussion • Questions from participants • Questions to the participants about the GSBPM

  3. NSI presentations • Implementation of GSBPM in each NSI • Modify GSBPM to meet NSI requirements • Benefits and lessons learned • Look at user metadata needs first and then adapt the GSBPM

  4. Questions to participants/panelists Q1. “When implementing the GSBPM in a statistics office, its benefits and advantages have to highlighted as much as possible. Units directly in charge of specific surveys must be also aware of those benefits.” What are the benefits of using the GSBPM in moving NSIs towards greater efficiency?

  5. Questions to workshop participants Q2. Would it be useful to develop and standardise a more detailed level of the GSBPM? Does the GSBPM need to revised? Any suggestions? Alternatively, • Should we expand existing case studies or create separate case studies on the national use of the GSBPM?

  6. Questions to workshop participants Q3. How does a common toolbox help systems to be more efficient (common methods, metadata, IT tools, work routines, templates, checklists, codelists, questionnaire DB)? • Is there a requirement to build a generic toolbox as part of GSBPM/CMF?

  7. Questions for workshop participants Q4. How can the GSBPM facilitate the exchange of (common) tools across organizations?

More Related