1 / 25

Socio-economic research – Progress update and Future p lans

Socio-economic research – Progress update and Future p lans. Ekin Birol, Manager, Impact and Policy. Aims of socio-economic studies. To inform efficient, effective and targeted crop development and delivery strategies

bernie
Télécharger la présentation

Socio-economic research – Progress update and Future p lans

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Socio-economic research – Progress update and Future plans Ekin Birol, Manager, Impact and Policy

  2. Aims of socio-economic studies • To inform efficient, effective and targeted crop development and delivery strategies • To measure the impact of delivery strategies in terms of adoption, diffusion and improvement in health status

  3. Portfolio of socio-economic studies • Completed/ongoing study • Varietal adoption study • Planned studies for 2012 • Value (supply) chain study • Consumer acceptance study • Impact assessment study • Pricing experiment

  4. Varietal adoption study • Aims • To understand the current “picture” of bean production and varietal choice • Current bean varietal adoption/diversification • Farmers’ preferences for various production and consumption traits • Farmers’ sources of information and seed • Household, market, agronomic factors that affect varietal adoption • Method • Structured farm household survey of representative sample of rural households

  5. Study design Sampling • All 5 provinces • All 30 Districts • 77 sectors • ≈ 180 villages • 1321 households Two (three) cropping Seasons Feb-March 2011

  6. Bean cultivation – by region & type • 85% of all rural households grew beans in both season A and B • 57% of farmers grew multiple varieties

  7. Top 10 varieties

  8. Importance of traits in varietal choice • For Rwanda • Most important traits are yield, market demand and taste • Nutrition is not rated highly • Differences in valuation of traits across provinces • Market demand – Eastern • Nutrition – Kigali and Eastern • Ability to withstand draught – Eastern & Southern • Ability to withstand rainfall – Northern

  9. Planting material sources • 85% of farmers used saved planting material from the previous season Original planting material sources for recyclers Sources of planting material for purchasers

  10. When to deliver planting material – season A

  11. Information sources 88% social networks

  12. Bean consumption and sales • A great majority of bean output (90%) is used for home consumption • Households consume beans 6 days a week 76% sold in the market 79% sold to traders

  13. Role of women in bean production “In Rwanda women are the bean specialists”

  14. Implications for development & delivery • Preliminary analysis results show… • Multiplicity of varieties within & across fields • Most important traits – variation across provinces • District level delivery schedule • Most farmers don’t buy planting material annually • Social networks important sources of information • Role of women in bean production • Further analysis/study needed • to identify the variety names collected • to understand factors that affect varietal choice and the segments in the market

  15. Portfolio of socio-economic studies • Completed/ongoing study • Varietal adoption study • Planned studies for 2012 • Value (supply) chain study • Consumer acceptance study • Impact assessment study • Pricing experiment

  16. Value chain study • Aims • To map of the bean seed and grain value chains • To understand the constraints and facilitating factors • To identify the main bean seed/grain attributes value chain actors look for • To understand high iron varieties’ marketability and price • Methods • Focus group discussions and key informant interviews (Eastern and Northern) • Timeline • June - September 2012

  17. Consumer acceptance study • Aims • To understand consumers’ sensory evaluation and valuation (willingness to pay) for high iron varieties • To understand the impact of information consumer acceptance • Methods • Food sciences – sensory evaluation (tasting) • Economics – eliciting willingness to pay surveys • Timeline • September 2012 – March 2013

  18. Impact assessment study • Aims • To measure the adoption and consumption of high iron varieties • To get feedback from high-iron bean growing farm households about various traits • Method • Collect a full list (i.e., census) of farmers who have bought high-iron bean seed • Randomly sample households from to interview • Timeline • Census was collected during delivery (February 2012) and survey will be conducted following harvest (September 2012)

  19. Pricing experiment • Aim • To understand the demand for high-iron bean seed and to ascertain the optimal price to charge • Method • Work with farmers and seed vendors before the planting season • Do a short baseline survey and give farmers discount vouchers (0%-100%) • Follow up survey to understand the use of vouchers • Timeline • August 2012 –March 2013

  20. Socio-economic studies in Rwanda

  21. Murakoze!! Merci beaucoup!! Thank you!!

  22. Bean area • For climbing smallest areas (total and per variety) in North and West and the largest in South and Kigali • For bush smallest areas (total and per variety) are in North and West and the largest in South and East

  23. Outline • Overall aim of socio-economic studies • Portfolio of socio-economic studies in Rwanda • Overview of the portfolio • For each study • Aims • Methods • Timeline

  24. Some household characteristics

  25. Impact evaluation study • Aims • To understand the nutrition impact • To understand what kind of delivery strategies work the best, are most cost-effectives and should be scaled up • Method • Randomisedcontrol trials: some communities will get seed (treatment) and some will not (control) • Baseline survey, intervention and endline survey • Timeline/location • When the full target varieties become available • Country TBD

More Related