1 / 24

Getting Started with Systematic Reviews: A Collaborative Workshop Experience

Join Kendall Searle and Josefine Antoniades in this interactive workshop designed to refine your research question and provide guidance on systematic reviews. Although we won’t cover specific search engine syntax or bias concepts, you will receive critical feedback, search-strategy leads, and practical tips to streamline your review process. Engage in group exercises to improve your order of operations in systematic review methodology. This workshop is perfect for students and researchers aiming for a structured, efficient approach to systematic reviews.

bert-harris
Télécharger la présentation

Getting Started with Systematic Reviews: A Collaborative Workshop Experience

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Your Infrastructure:-Choosing & Using Your Guidelines Getting Started With Your Systematic Review A Workshop by:- Kendall Searle JosefineAntoniades

  2. HOW? A collaborative workshop format! This work shop will not address:- • The different syntax used for different search engines (Anne Young) • Concepts concerning bias • The tools needed to appraise the quality of your articles • Key analysis approaches e.g.: narrative and meta analysis These will be covered in forthcoming workshops! This work shop will help you to:- • Refine your research question • Give you feedback on your research question • Give you search-strategy leads • Provide some infrastructure to facilitate a systematic approach • Give practical time-saving tips • Reflect a student’s real learning!

  3. How we are going to divide our time:-

  4. Every Body Panic Now! You have to do a SYSTEMATIC what??!!

  5. Exercise One: Everybody Panic Now! • Arrange yourselves into groups • Each group to receive one envelope • Inside each envelope you will find a set of phrases • You have five minutes to read each of the phrases in turn and then place them in a logical order • Once you have decided your order, use the blue-tack to stick them up on the white-board.

  6. After the Panic Comes Order! • What do you notice about the orders? • Where have you seen these statements before? • What is the gold standard approach? • How does the gold standard differ from the average student experience? • If you are time and resource poor, which steps might you cut out? • What is the consequence of this? • What other steps, if any, would you add? See Hand Out: Exercise 1:Everybody Panic Now

  7. http://www.prisma-statement.org/2.1.2%20-%20PRISMA%202009%20Checklist.pdfhttp://www.prisma-statement.org/2.1.2%20-%20PRISMA%202009%20Checklist.pdf Systematic Reviews

  8. Systematic Reviews

  9. What is a Systematic Review? A trusty route map!

  10. Top Tips from a Newly Initiated Student • Infrastructureis your Protocol. A plan for resource allocation! • Infrastructure avoids bias! • Infrastructure helps you to manage your supervisor and collaborators – and look good! • Infrastructure aids writing up by giving you personal targets • Infrastructure makes analysis quick and easy! Even the greatest of works needed infrastructure to aid the making!

  11. Facilitate Your Briefing With An Easy to Use List:- Source: Common mental disorder among factory workers in mainland China:- a systematic review by Kendall Searle

  12. YOUR PRISMA FLOW CHART Don’t be shy about writing it up as you go along. Use it as a reward system for yourself! It keeps track of your work and needs to be included in your final paper anyway!

  13. Maximise on End Note As A Site to:- • Download each of your database searches • Deal with duplicates • Record each of your screening steps • Code your screen-outs • Build a PDF resource • Write-up with citations Source: Common Mental Disorders Amongst Migrant/Factory Workers in Mainland China: Coding in Progress

  14. Which Guide For You? CONSORT 2010 Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (1996) Initial scope covers two-armed, parallel, randomized, controlled trials Extensions for non-inferiority, equivalence, factorial, cluster, crossover trials 25-point check list (but lots of a’s and b’s!) Reporting of funding & ethics advised but not in check list Institute of Medicine, USA www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Finding-What-Works-in-Health-Care-Standards-for-Systematic-Reviews.aspx Emphasizes team approach Itemizes conflict of interest and funding concerns Considers qualitative alongside quantitative review Divides standards into 4 activity groups PRISMA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses (2009) Handy PICOS to help frame your question Covers non-randomisedstudies to assess the benefits and harms of interventions Can be modified for diagnosis or prognosis 27-point check list Clear, complete and transparent reporting of trial information to provide an unbiased evidence-base for decision making

  15. PICOS:-Frames your research interest to improve the explicitness of your review question

  16. PICOS:-Frames your research interest to improve the explicitness of your review question

  17. PICOS:-Frames your research interest to improve the explicitness of your review question

  18. PICOS:-Frames your research interest to improve the explicitness of your review question

  19. PICOS:-Frames your research interest to improve the explicitness of your review question

  20. PICOS:-Frames your research interest to improve the explicitness of your review question

  21. Refining Your Research Question A student case study Common Mental Disorders amongst Migrants/Factory Workers in Mainland China

  22. PICOS:-Frames your research interest to improve the explicitness of your review question

  23. Important Websites • The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions www.cochrane.org/handbook • PRISMA Transparent reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses http://www.prisma-statement.org/ • Institute of Medicine, USA. Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Finding-What-Works-in-Health-Care-Standards-for-Systematic-Reviews.aspx • International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO

More Related