1 / 8

DEBATE

DEBATE. An Introduction. Three Different Debates. Cross Examination or Policy (team) Focus is on depth of research, 1 topic/ year, governmental policy.

bert
Télécharger la présentation

DEBATE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DEBATE An Introduction

  2. Three Different Debates • Cross Examination or Policy (team) • Focus is on depth of research, 1 topic/ year, governmental policy. • Topic 2011-12: Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase its exploration and/or development of space beyond the Earth’s mesosphere. • Public Forum Debate (team) • Focus is on debate for the lay person, persuasion, 1 topic/ month. • Topic October 2011: Resolved: Private sector investment in human space exploration is preferable to public sector investment. • Lincoln Douglas Debate (individual) • Focus is on philosophical debate, 1 topic/ 2 months. • Topic September/October 2011: Resolved: Justice requires the recognition of animal rights.

  3. The Structure of a CX Debate • Constructive Speeches • 1AC: 8 Minutes • Cross-Examined by 2NC: 3 Minutes • 1NC: 8 Minutes • Cross-Examined by 1AC: 3 Minutes • 2AC: 8 Minutes • Cross-Examined by 1NC: 3 Minutes • 2NC: 8 Minutes • Cross-Examined by 2AC: 3 Minutes • Rebuttal Speeches • 1NR: 5 Minutes • 1AR: 5 Minutes • 2NR: 5 Minutes • 2AR: 5 Minutes

  4. The Stock Issues • Topicality: Is it germane? • Harm: Is there a problem? • Significance: Is it a problem that warrants attention? • Inherency: What is causing the problem? • Solvency: Can the problem be solved?

  5. The Structure of PF Debate • 4 MIN. TEAM A SPEAKER 1 CONSTRUCTIVE • 4 MIN. TEAM B SPEAKER 1 CONSTRUCTIVE • 3 MIN. CROSSFIRE –SPEAKER A1 & B1 • 4 MIN. TEAM A SPEAKER 2 CONSTRUCTIVE • 4 MIN. TEAM B SPEAKER 2 CONSTRUCTIVE • 3 MIN. CROSSFIRE – SPEAKER A2 & B2 • 2 MIN. TEAM A SPEAKER 1 SUMMARY • 2 MN. TEAM B SPEAKER 2 SUMMARY • 3 MIN. GRAND CROSSFIRE – ALL DEBATERS • 2 MIN. TEAM A SPEAKER 2 FINAL FOCUS • 2 MIN. TEAM B SPEAKER 2 FINAL FOCUS • EACH TEAM IS ALLOWED 2 MIN. OF PREPARATION TIME DURING THE COURSE OF THE DEBATE. TIME IS CHARGED TO THE TEAM OF THE NEXT SPEAKER (i.e. any time taken before Team B speakers is charged Team B)

  6. Public Forum Debate • Less focus on format, more focus on basic persuasion • Research is necessary but quality outweighs quantity • Crossfire is more like a conversation as both ask and answer questions • A good place to start

  7. The Structure of LD Debate • 6 MIN. AFFIRMATIVE CONSTRUCTIVE • 3 MIN. NEGATIVE QUESTIONS AFFIRMATIVE • 7 MIN. NEGATIVE CONSTRUCTIVE • 3 MIN. AFFIRMATIVE QUESTIONS NEGATIVE • 4 MIN. AFFIRMATIVE REBUTTAL • 6 MIN. NEGATIVE REBUTTAL • 3 MIN. AFFIRMATIVE CONCLUSION • EACH DEBATER IS ALLOWED 3 MIN. OF PREPARATION TIME DURING THE COURSE OF THE DEBATE. . TIME IS CHARGED TO THE TEAM OF THE NEXT SPEAKER (i.e. any time taken before the 1st negative speech is charged to the negative)

  8. Lincoln Douglas Debate • The affirmative and negative each choose a value that applies to the resolution to show the superiority of their side. • Philosophical theory and empirical evidence is used to support each side. • Debaters gain a strong foundation in philosophy.

More Related