1 / 57

Implants and Additives Galen Erickson

Implants and Additives Galen Erickson. Partially missing implant. Improper Location. Crushed Implants. Implanting Defects. Abscess. Walled-off. Implanting Defects. Implants and Body Composition. Implants increase protein deposition. Implants cause a upward shift in the growth curve.

bess
Télécharger la présentation

Implants and Additives Galen Erickson

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Implants and Additives Galen Erickson

  2. Partially missing implant • Improper Location • Crushed Implants Implanting Defects

  3. Abscess • Walled-off Implanting Defects

  4. Implants and Body Composition • Implants increase protein deposition. • Implants cause a upward shift in the growth curve. • The shift in the growth curve influences body composition at a given weight.

  5. Implants Change the Growth Curve 28.6% EBF Low Choice

  6. Relationship of empty body fat to Quality Grade(total of 1,355 animals)

  7. Implant impact on BW 28% EBF - Steers Weight @ 28% Fat Increase • Non-implanted 1145 • Rev-IS 1175a +30 • Component-ES • Ralgro/Rev-S 1212b +67 • Revalor-S 1 x • Syn-S/Rev-S 1223c +78 • Rev-IS/Rev-IS • Rev-IS/Rev-S 1237d +92 • Rev-S/Rev-S Guiroy et al., 2002

  8. Implant impacts none revalor-S Diff %change N 1040 1040 DOF 135 135 ADG 3.18 3.79 0.61 19.2 F:G 6.62 5.92 -0.7 -10.6 HCW 727.6 779.2 51.6 7.1 FW 1155 1237 82 7.1 % Choice 75.0 63.7 -11.3 -15.1 Intervet and Texas Tech Implant database: http://idb.afs.ttu.edu/dbhome/default.htm

  9. Implant impacts none syn-S/rev-S Diff %change N 379 443 DOF 162 158 ADG 2.94 3.52 .58 19.7 F:G 6.40 5.61 -0.8 -12.3 HCW 687.8 759.1 71.3 10.4 FW 1092 1205 113 10.4 % Choice 70.4 52.7 -17.7 -25.1 Intervet and Texas Tech Implant database: http://idb.afs.ttu.edu/dbhome/default.htm

  10. Economics for implants none implanting assumption N 100 100 Sell weight - 8000 lb 80lb/hd more $70 - $5,600 $80 - $6,400 $90 - $7,200

  11. Economics for implants none implanting assumption N 100 100 Sell weight - 8000 lb 80lb/hd more $70 - $5,600 $80 - $6,400 $90 - $7,200 %choice 15 hd 800 lb carcass $2/cwt spread 240 - $6/cwt spread 720 - $15/cwt spread 1800 - $22/cwt spread 2640 - Implant & work 800 -

  12. Economics for implants none implanting assumption N 100 100 Sell weight - 8000 lb 80lb/hd more $70 - $5,600 $80 - $6,400 $90 - $7,200 %choice 15 hd 800 lb carcass $2/cwt spread 240 - $6/cwt spread 720 - $15/cwt spread 1800 - $22/cwt spread 2640 - Implant & work 800 - $/made 1040-34405600-7200 $40.80/hd today: $61.60

  13. Implant Decision Making Gender Diet Energy Marketing goals Days from market!!! 0-120 one implant 120-140 weak initial or delayed 140-160 intermediate and terminal 160+ strong E, intermediate comb, Always build on implant strength

  14. Feed Additives Ionophores- Rumensin, Bovatec, Cattlyst, Gainpro, Vmax Coccidiostats- Deccox, Amprolium, Rumensin, Bovatec Antibiotics- Tylan, CTC, OTC Hormone- MGA, heifermaxx Β-agonists- Optaflexx, Zilmax

  15. Feed Additives Premix-Type A Supplements-Type B Final diets-Type C Compendium rules! FDA regulated, no off-label use allowed Law is 90% DM basis, g/ton and mg/hd

  16. Rumensin Large Impact on Nutritional Management • ↓ Performance • ↑ Intake Variation • ↑ Acidosis • ↑ Digestive Deads • ↓ Coccidiosis Protection Cooper slides, 2004

  17. Rumensin Mode of Action Propionate Acetate Fermentable Feed Acetate Propionate Lactate Cooper slides, 2004

  18. Rumensin Mode of Action Propionate Acetate Fermentable Feed Acetate Propionate Lactate Cooper slides, 2004

  19. Rumensin Performance Four Trial Summary (2,904 Steers) Source: Laudert, 1990 Cooper slides, 2004

  20. Rumensin Performance • Original research showed 10% improvement in feed conversion • Recent research shows 3-4% improvement • Difference likely due to ration energy level • Summary • Direct effect on performance is lower in today’s rations • Greater improvement with Deads-In Cooper slides, 2004

  21. Rumensin Digestive Deads • Dr. Baxter Black, 1980 • Digestive deaths decreased by 2/3rds after inclusion of Rumensin Cooper slides, 2004

  22. Rumensin Digestive Deads Cooper slides, 2004

  23. Rumensin Acidosis Rumensin reduces acidosis and bloat • Directly • ↓ lactate production • ↑ lactate utilization • ↓ rumen fluid viscosity • Indirectly • ↓ day-to-day intake variation • Improved feeding behavior Cooper slides, 2004

  24. RumensinIntake Variation Within Pen * * * Source: Stock et al., 1995 Cooper slides, 2004

  25. RumensinIntake Variation Across Days * * * Source: Stock et al., 1995 Cooper slides, 2004

  26. RumensinFeeding Behavior and Acidosis Source: Cooper, 1997 Cooper slides, 2004

  27. RumensinCoccidiosis Cocci Death Loss per 100,000 hd Source: Edwards, 1984 Cooper slides, 2004

  28. RumensinCoccidiosis Source: Watkins et al., 1986 Cooper slides, 2004

  29. Rumensin conclusions Acidosis and Bloat • Feed more roughage • Level • Type • Limit extensively processed grains • High moisture corn • Steam-flaked corn • Optimize byproduct level • Digestible fiber replacing starch • Corn oil increases energy content • Provides small amount of lactate Cooper slides, 2004

  30. Ionophore Economics Rumensin improves F:G by 4% 1% change in F:G improves $2.80/hd range $2.50 to $3.00 Therefore: $10.00 to $12.00 return from performance Cost: 2 cent/hd/d: approximately $3.00 RUMENSIN SAVE: range: $7.00 to $9.00 1996 Scientific Update, Elanco Animal Health; Laudert, 1990

  31. Liver Abscesses Elanco Animal Health

  32. Tylan none Tylan %change Trials 40 40 DOF 134 134 Pens 40 40 ADG 2.84 2.90 2.1 F:G 6.72 6.90 -2.6 Liver abscesses 27.9 7.5 Dressing % 61.65 61.80 Elanco Animal Health Technical Bulletin; Laudert and Vogel

  33. Tylan Economics none Tylan %change F:G 6.72 6.90 -2.6 1% change in F:G improves $2.80/hd range $2.50 to $3.00 Therefore: $6.50 to $7.80 return from performance Cost: 1 cent/hd/d: approximately $1.50 TYLAN SAVE: range: $5.00 to $6.30

  34. MGA Interaction with heifer age (Mader and Lechtenberg, 2000; Anderson, 1991) 1% change in F:G improves $2.80/hd range $2.50 to $3.00 MGA generally: 4%+ improvement with yearling heifers Therefore: $10.00 to $12.00 return from F:G sell more weight 10 to 15 lb.

  35. Recent commercial studies Steers 0 100 200 Initial weight -----------1206---------- Final weight 1292.4 1300.4 1307.2 ADG 3.04 3.33 3.57 F:G 6.74 6.12 5.67 HCW 825.4 830.7 837.7 marbling 504 504 501 % choice 47.6 48.5 45.6 YG 2.87 2.85 2.84 Current Elanco recommendation: 200 mg/hd for 28 d.

  36. Expected Response Steers 100 200 300 Increase in live wt 10 17 21 Increase in carcass wt 6 14 18 Calculated return, $/hd Price at $80/cwt live 6.30 6.60 4.50 Price at $70/cwt live 4.20 4.90 3.50 Steers only, fed 28 days and ~$7.00 for Optaflexx fed at 200 mg/hd Current Elanco recommendation: 200 mg/hd for 28 d.

  37. Optaflexx issues Requirements 70-430 mg/hd/d 8.2 to 24.6 g/ton (90% DM basis) 9.1 to 27.3 g/ton DM At 24 lb DMI = 16.7 g/ton DM Fed final 28-42 days prior to market Recommendation 200 mg/hd/d for 28 days

  38. Optaflexx issues Benefits Increased weight (profitable) Improved efficiency late in feeding period Little to no effect on carcass traits Approved for use with Rum/Tylan

  39. My thoughts Increases Decreases • Weight • N retention late • REA • Efficiency • YG • No effect (<200 mg) • Marbling • Tenderness With trained panels, > 200 mg was not as positive on carcass quality Very positive on most traits, and is safe Concern with sorting and the 28-42 d window, may create challenges Fun to test over the next few years

  40. Zilmax • Zilpaterol hydrochloride • 22.05 lb bag (10kg) • 4.8% product • 4.8% of the bag is active Zilpaterol • 21.77 grams of active/lb (48 g/kg) • One bag contains 480 g of Zilmax • Corn cob grit, Zilpaterol, surfactant and binder • Manufactured in France • Store at or below 77 degrees F

  41. Permitted Claims and Limitations b

  42. Zilmax Inclusion Rate • Cattle Fed in Confinement for Slaughter • All feeding rates on label expressed on a 90% DM basis • 6.8 g/ton on a 90% DM basis • 7.6 g/ton on a 100% DM basis

  43. Zilmax Feeding Directions • Feed continuously to cattle fed in confinement for slaughter as the sole ration for the last 20 to 40 days at 7.6 g/ton (100% DM) to provide 60-90 mg/hd/d. • Approved to be fed in combination with Rumensin, Tylan and MGA • Approved for use in Type B supplements dry (meal or pelleted) and liquid

More Related