1 / 22

Rapid Risk Assessment Preparedness, Response, Recovery, and Mitigation

Rapid Risk Assessment Preparedness, Response, Recovery, and Mitigation. Workshop U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, Maryland Pacific Northwest National Laboratory November 15-17, 2005. Team. Gariann Gelston (HERS), Project Manager Gene Whelan (NR), Technical Lead

beverlygreene
Télécharger la présentation

Rapid Risk Assessment Preparedness, Response, Recovery, and Mitigation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Rapid Risk AssessmentPreparedness, Response, Recovery, and Mitigation Workshop U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, Maryland Pacific Northwest National Laboratory November 15-17, 2005

  2. Team • Gariann Gelston (HERS), Project Manager • Gene Whelan (NR), Technical Lead • Dave Millard (ISE), EMAdvantage Lead • Chitra Sivaraman (ISE) • Tim Downing (ISE) • Mitch Pelton (HERS), FRAMES Lead • Dennis Strenge (HERS) • Bonnie Hoopes (HERS) • Tarang Khangaonkar (MSL), EFDC Lead • Zhaoqing Yang (MSL) • Cheegwan Lee (MSL) • Lon Hachmeister (MSL) • Mary Simpson/Joan Young (HERS), DS Lead 2

  3. “Multi-Thematic” Modeling Supporters • Engineer Research & Development Center, ACOE • National Environmental Research Laboratory, ORD, EPA • Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, NRC • Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, OAR, EPA • Office of Environmental Management, DOE • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, DOE • Multimedia Modeling: $23M ($8M for FRAMES) • FEMIS/EMAdvantage: $42M 3

  4. Purpose • Provide an illustrative example that combines a multi-thematic modeling capability with emergency planning & response tools to create an automated system, which provides a real-time linkage between scientific and emergency-response communities. 4

  5. Introduction • Preparedness, Response, Recovery, & Mitigation • Air is common • Now easily link soil, surface water, groundwater, exposure pathway/routes, decision support, etc. • Integrated Multi-thematic capability, illustrating water • Not Vaporware • Simulated Sensor Data • Pre-run 3-D surface water flow and transport • Real site with real data • Demonstration of actual software actually running 5

  6. Proposition • Release of an unknown contaminant, unknown strength, unknown location to a water body, where a nearby population is potentially exposed • Question: What is the potential impact to the surrounding area, and what response plan do you implement, if the contaminant levels are unacceptable? • Operate Status Board Command & Control system linked with “Multi-thematic Modeling” running in the background 6

  7. Preparation Work • Spatial description of site • Sensors • Contaminants of Concern (CoC) • Exposure scenarios/pathways per zone • Fate & Transport Models (Calibrate/Validate) • Protective/Response Action Plans • Protective Action Thresholds and Recommendations 7

  8. Demonstration Steps • Operational System • Status Board notification through sensors • Incident Identification • Surface Water Back Calculation • Surface Water Transport Forward Calculation • Risk Impact Analysis • Post Protective Action Recommendations 8

  9. Demonstration Steps (cont’d) • Choose and Implement best-fit Protective Action Plan • Evaluate differences between Protective Action Recommendations and Final Protective Action Decision • Re-evaluate in real-time as the assessment requires 9

  10. SUMMARY Relationship Between Incident Characterization and Emergency Response & Recovery • INCIDENT • CHARACTERIZATION • HAZARD • ANALYSIS • Area Affected • Impact Estimates • Times / Durations • CONSEQUENCE • ASSESSMENT • Population • Critical Infrastructure WEATHER PRODUCTS SENSOR DATA REPORTS INCIDENT INFORMATION ‘STATIC’ GEO- SPATIAL DATA ALERTS SITE SPECIFIC DATA • EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS & RESPONSE • Examine Incident Characterization Information • Autonomously Make Protective Action Decisions • Identify and execute Plans and Annexes • Transition from initial response, to sustained response • Transition from Response to Recovery PRODUCT TRANSFER 10

  11. Spatial Description of Site(water, shoreline, land zones; facilities) BACK

  12. S9 S8 S5 S7 S6 S4 S3 Sensor Locations S1 2 km Sensors S2 BACK 12

  13. Exposure Scenarios/Pathways per Zone BACK 13

  14. Protective Action Thresholdsand Recommendations(Water, Shoreline, Land) BACK 14

  15. S9 S8 S5 S7 S4 S6 S3 Sensor Locations S2 S1 2 km Status Board Notification through Sensors BACK

  16. S9 S8 S5 S7 S4 S6 S3 Sensor Locations S2 S1 2 km Incident Identification (sensors exceed threshold) BACK

  17. S9 S8 S5 S7 S4 R6 S6 R5 R3 R4 R2 S3 R1 Sensor Locations S2 S1 Initial Release 2 km Surface Water Back Calculations Estimate Potential Release Points and Source Strengths BACK

  18. Surface WaterTransport Forward Calculation Back Forward

  19. Surface Water TransportForward Calculation ▼ Chosen Source Previous Slide Back

  20. Risk Impact Analysis • ● Overlay plume, which exceeds a threshold, on to zones • ● Identify zones directly impacted by plume • ● Identify zones • indirectly impacted BACK

  21. Post Protective Action Recommendations(Water, Shoreline, Land) BACK

  22. Scenario Comparison Detects Drinking Hazard Index Shower Garden Response Cost Time Contaminant Concentration Probability of Exceedence Concentration Time Is this significant? Rapid Risk Assessment

More Related