1 / 30

Mobilization of Resources for Disaster Mitigation, Preparedness and Response

Mobilization of Resources for Disaster Mitigation, Preparedness and Response. A Special Case!. Why a Special Case?. Sources of financing are different . Why a Special Case?. Procedures are also different. Different Sources of Financing. Ministries of Foreign Affairs

cana
Télécharger la présentation

Mobilization of Resources for Disaster Mitigation, Preparedness and Response

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mobilization of Resources for Disaster Mitigation, Preparedness and Response A Special Case!

  2. Why a Special Case? Sources of financing are different

  3. Why a Special Case? Procedures are also different

  4. Different Sources of Financing • Ministries of Foreign Affairs • Offices of humanitarian assistance • or other specialized channels

  5. Different Sources of Financing United States • Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA/USAID) • Used to be the single source for emergency assistance and support for prevention/Mitigation/Preparedness (PMP) • A core donor for PAHO: Member of the PHP

  6. USA • Now the US Southern Command (SouthCom) has become a major source of funding and support for preparedness and relief. • Coordination with OFDA ?

  7. Canada Different Sources of Financing: • IHA: International Humanitarian Assistance • Part of CIDA’s multilateral branch … it cannot give funds bilaterally to countries! • Covers disaster prevention to response • A core donor for PAHO: Member of the PHP

  8. UK: DFID/CHAD • CHAD is a specialized branch for refugees, IDP and emergencies of the Department for International Development • A core donor of PAHO: Member of the PHP

  9. European Union Different Sources of Financing: • ECHO: European Community Humanitarian Office • A budget of US$ 0.8 billion! • Requires the signature of a formal “Partnership Agreement” with ECHO • Preference given to European NGOs

  10. Managing ECHO’s funds at country level requires an efficient organization-wide financial monitoring system. ECHO ECU E U

  11. Other examples Different Sources of Financing: • A Secretariat for Humanitarian Affairs • A humanitarian office in Foreign Affairs • The Department of Cooperation for projects on mitigation and preparedness France:

  12. What is the relevance of having different sources of financing? • These funds are not available for other health priorities

  13. Different Procedures • Fortunately, procedures for obtaining funds from these sources are much easier! • In most cases, there is a free format (ECHO used to be the only exception) • Increasingly, LFA is required for preparedness projects, but rarely for emergency assistance projects.

  14. Different Procedures: • The Emergency procedure is informal (a 2 page fax can bring a commitment of half a million dollars) • In cases of emergency: • immediate request (within 24 hours!) • speedy execution (average: 3 months)

  15. How can funds be mobilized in times of emergency? • International appeals • Bilateral requests

  16. Channels for International Appeals Appeals by OCHA • The Situation Reports of OCHA offer the most convenient, speedy and complete approach; • PAHO/WHO is responsible for the health content in OCHA situation reports.

  17. Channels for International Appeals: Appeals by PAHO: • enjoys high credibility abroad; • reaches a smaller but selective number of donors; • requires rapid and coordinated action at all levels

  18. Channels for International Appeals Appeals by WHO (EHA or EMC): • WHO submits the request through the missions in Geneva.

  19. International Appeals The U.N. “consolidated appeal”:A trend encouraged by the donors

  20. Direct Bilateral Request • Requires more work initially, but reduces inappropriate or duplicative assistance • separate requests to each of the donors are preferred • a common diagnosis on the health situation (Ministry, PAHO, NGOs) is helpful...

  21. Embassies are coordinating within the country: • The embassy and the humanitarian office in the donor country’s capital city also talk together: • Donors trust is built by: • pre-disaster technical collaboration with Foreign Affairs • Convening donors meetings

  22. Lessons Learned • The international community did not fully participate in its evaluation • Official reports did not differentiate between damages and emergency requirements Cuba (Hurricane Lily)

  23. Lessons Learned Donors did not wait Requests sent one week after the impact arrived too late ! Nicaragua (Hurricane)

  24. Factors of success • The nature of the disaster and the # of deaths • the coverage of Mass Media • The political status of the bilateral relation • The occurrence of other disaster worldwide

  25. The main ingredients • SPEED • SPEED • SPEED

  26. Conclusions: • More administrative flexibility is required from PAHO and the Countries. It is essential to maintain or strengthen our dexterity and speed in the search for “humanitarian” funds. Turbo-PAHO

  27. SPEEDY REQUEST BUT NOT TOO MUCH! • THE CASE OF NICARAGUA

  28. Conclusions Decentralization by the donors imposes a closer coordination between MoH, Foreign Affairs and PAHO/WHO

  29. Conclusions: Speed AND Coordination are the keywords in the mobilization of humanitarian funds

More Related