1 / 8

SNR Basic Column Retrieval R. De Beek, M. Weber, R. Siddans (RAL), B. Latter (RAL)

SNR Basic Column Retrieval R. De Beek, M. Weber, R. Siddans (RAL), B. Latter (RAL) SNR output from RAL noise model program (PR1, Section 1.3). SNR calculation for 0.1875 sec GOME pixels (corresponding to integration of 10 successive LOS in CDI simulations) and 30 sec IT solar irradiance.

bhouser
Télécharger la présentation

SNR Basic Column Retrieval R. De Beek, M. Weber, R. Siddans (RAL), B. Latter (RAL)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SNR Basic Column Retrieval • R. De Beek, M. Weber, R. Siddans (RAL), B. Latter (RAL) • SNR output from RAL noise model program (PR1, Section 1.3). • SNR calculation for 0.1875 sec GOME pixels (corresponding to integration of 10 successive LOS in CDI simulations) and 30 sec IT solar irradiance. • Gaussian random noise spectra created assuming model noise level corresponds to 2 (95% percentile). • Outliers above 2 are removed (no spurious spikes). • Slant column fit results from noise free spectra are used as reference for percent error estimate • 24 scenes (Version 3) times 24 GOME ground pixel (across track) fits carried out for the 4 fitting windows (O3, NO2, BrO, OClO)

  2. Ozone slant column fit • 325-335 nm • NO2, BrO, O3 (221 K), O3 (240 K) • Quadratic polynomial subtracted • Summary • errors all below 0.7% • largest error observed in ozone hole scenario (151 DU) • error not dependent on scan angle • average max. error ~0.2% (high albedo) and ~0.3% (low albedo) approximating 2 standard deviation.

  3. NO2 slant column fit • 425-450 nm • O3, O4, H2O • Quadratic polynomial subtracted • Summary • errors all below 60% • error not dependent on scan angle • average max error ~20% (high albedo) and ~30% (low albedo) for stratospheric NO2 columns

  4. BrO slant column fit • 344-360 nm • O3(T), NO2, O4, BrO, H2CO • Cubic polynomial subtracted • Summary • errors all below 80% • average max error ~30% (high albedo) and ~50% (low albedo) for stratospheric BrO columns • error smaller for enhanced PBL BrO scenes (<15%) • free tropospheric BrO (1ppt) scene only distinguishable from other scenarios at high albedo

  5. OClO slant column fit • 363-393 nm nm • O3, NO2, BrO, O4 • Cubic polynomial subtracted • Summary • OClO only observable under twilight condition and after chlorine activation due to PSC formation (ozone hole scenario) • ozone hole scenario: error below 150% (low albedo) and below 80% (high albedo)

  6. SZA dependence of slant column error: O3 and NO2 O3 higher errors at large SZA and low ozone NO2 higher errors at at large SZA (high and low albedo) and in tropics (low albedo)

  7. SZA dependence of slant column error: BrO and OClO BrO lowest errors in presence of tropospheric BrO (49° and 76° SZA) OClO  only retrievable under ozone hole condition (76° SZA)

  8. First Conclusion for IT=0.1875 sec: • Slant column errors larger than 20% for minor trace gases other than ozone • Ozone slant column errors are well below 1% • Errors are very much reduced in regions of enhanced tropospheric column amounts (local events) • Co-adding might be necessary to reduce error

More Related