1 / 29

Public Opinion Survey 2005 Summary Results for Scotland

Topic Paper No 11. Public Opinion Survey 2005 Summary Results for Scotland. FORESTRY COMMISSION IN HOME OMNIBUS RESULTS MARCH 2005. mruk research City Wall House, 32 Eastwood Avenue Glasgow G41 3NS Tel: 0141 533 3350 Fax: 0141 533 3320 research@mruk.co.uk www.mruk.co.uk. GB11370.

biana
Télécharger la présentation

Public Opinion Survey 2005 Summary Results for Scotland

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Topic Paper No 11 Public Opinion Survey 2005 Summary Results for Scotland

  2. FORESTRY COMMISSION IN HOME OMNIBUS RESULTS MARCH 2005 mruk research City Wall House, 32 Eastwood Avenue Glasgow G41 3NS Tel: 0141 533 3350 Fax: 0141 533 3320 research@mruk.co.uk www.mruk.co.uk GB11370

  3. CONTENTS • Methodology and sample • Graphical summary • Data tabulations

  4. Methodology and sample • The mruk Omnibus is a monthly Scottish Consumer Omnibus and 1000 interviews are conducted in-home each month • There are 52 constituency based sample points. The distribution of sample points is in line with the geographic spread of the population • Interviews are conducted using a random route approach within each of the sampling points. One interview is conducted per household and quotas are imposed on age and gender to reflect the population • The sample is structured to match population profile estimates, allowing analysis and comparison between each wave of fieldwork to monitor changes in awareness, attitudes or behaviour over time • 1,009 adults (aged 16 or over) were interviewed during the March wave of the Omnibus survey • Interviews for the March survey were conducted between 11th – 17th March 2005

  5. Figure 1: Topics recalled in last 12 months * = less than 1% Base: 2003: 1018, 2005: 1009 Source: mruk research, March 2005

  6. Figure 2: Awareness of promotions Source: mruk research, March 2005

  7. Figure 3: Good reasons to support forestry Source: mruk research, March 2005

  8. Figure 4A: Perception of Scottish Forestry – “Providing opportunities for walking” * * = less than 1% Base: 2003: 1018; 2005: 1009 Source: mruk research, March 2005

  9. Figure 4B: Perception of Scottish Forestry – “Protecting the environment” * * = less than 1% Base: 2003: 1018; 2005: 1009 Source: mruk research, March 2005

  10. Figure 4C: Perception of Scottish Forestry – “Providing Scotland’s timber, board and paper needs” * * * = less than 1% Base: 2003: 1018; 2005: 1009 Source: mruk research, March 2005

  11. Figure 4D: Perception of Scottish Forestry – “Providing homes for birds and other animals” * * * = less than 1% Base: 2003: 1018; 2005: 1009 Source: mruk research, March 2005

  12. Figure 4E: Perception of Scottish Forestry – “Involving local communities” * * = less than 1% Base: 2003: 1018; 2005: 1009 Source: mruk research, March 2005

  13. Figure 4F: Perception of Scottish Forestry – “Supporting the economy in rural areas” * * = less than 1% Base: 2003: 1018; 2005: 1009 Source: mruk research, March 2005

  14. Figure 4G: Perception of Scottish Forestry – “Overall rating (2004) / performance (2005) of Scottish Forestry” * * = less than 1% Base: 2003: 1018; 2005: 1009 Source: mruk research, March 2005

  15. Figure 5: Perception of amount of wood Scotland produces Base: 2003: 1018; 2005: 1009 Source: mruk research, March 2005

  16. Figure 6: Has total amount of woodland in Scotland increased, decreased or stayed the same Base: 2003: 1018; 2005: 1009 Source: mruk research, March 2005

  17. Figure 7: Has amount of native woodland, increased, decreased or stayed the same Base: 2003: 1018; 2005: 1009 Source: mruk research, March 2005

  18. Figure 8: Desire to have more or less woodland * Base: 2003: 1018; 2005: 1009 Source: mruk research, March 2005

  19. Figure 9: Amount of woodland desired Base: 2003: 586; 2005: 472 (Those who would like to see more woodland in their part of Scotland) Source: mruk research, March 2005

  20. Figure 10: Preferred area of woodland to be created? (2005 only) * * = less than 1% Base: 472 (Those who would like to see more woodland in their part of Scotland) Source: mruk research, March 2005

  21. Figure 11: Visited forests or woodlands for walks, picnics or other recreation Base: 2003: 1018; 2005: 1009 Source: mruk research, March 2005

  22. Figure 12: Visited woodlands in the countryside or woodlands in and around towns * * Equals less than 1% Base: 2003: 648; 2005: 508 (Those who had visited forests or woodlands for walks, picnics or other recreation) Source: mruk research, March 2005

  23. Figure 13: Main reason you did not visit woodlands * = less than 1% Base: (Those who had not visited forests / woodlands for walks, picnics or other recreation) Source: mruk research, March 2005

  24. Figure 14: Improvements to woodlands near to where you live? (2005 only) All ‘others’ 1% or less Base: (Those interested in visiting forests / woodlands) Source: mruk research, March 2005

  25. Figure 15: Improvements to other woodlands visited? (2005 only) All ‘others’ 1% or less Base: (Those who had visited forests or woodlands for walks, picnics or other recreation) Source: mruk research, March 2005

  26. Figure 16: Sources of information used if visiting forests or woodlands Base: (Those interested in visiting forests / woodlands) Source: mruk research, March 2005

  27. Figure 17: Attended organised learning activities… * = less than 1% Source: mruk research, March 2005

  28. Figure 18: Long term illness, health problems or disability Base: 2003: 1018; 2005: 1009 Source: mruk research, March 2005

  29. DATA TABULATIONS March 2005

More Related