1 / 12

DISSERTATION BOOT CAMP PRESENTATION: JUNE 4

DISSERTATION BOOT CAMP PRESENTATION: JUNE 4. JORGE GOMEZ. DESSERTATION TOPIC. THE RELATIONSHIP OF INSTRUCTOR TECHNICAL LITERACY AND PEDAGOGICAL EXPERIENCE AND CONSIDERING TEACHER ATTITUDE TO THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTS IN CAREER ACADEMIES. RESEARCH QUESTIONS.

bijan
Télécharger la présentation

DISSERTATION BOOT CAMP PRESENTATION: JUNE 4

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DISSERTATION BOOT CAMP PRESENTATION: JUNE 4 JORGE GOMEZ

  2. DESSERTATION TOPIC • THE RELATIONSHIP OF INSTRUCTOR TECHNICAL LITERACY AND PEDAGOGICAL EXPERIENCE AND CONSIDERING TEACHER ATTITUDE TO THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTS IN CAREER ACADEMIES

  3. RESEARCH QUESTIONS • 1. What is the degree of relationship between the level of technical literacy of career academy instructors and the academic performance of career academy students? • 2. What is the degree of relationship between the level of pedagogical experience of career academy instructors and the academic performance of career academy students?

  4. RESEARCH QUESTIONS • 3. What is the degree of relationship between teacher technical literacy and student academic performance when controlling for teacher attitudes toward technology integration? • 4. What is the degree of relationship between teacher pedagogical experience and student academic performance when controlling for teacher attitudes toward technology integration?

  5. Criterion (Dependent) VariablesStudent Academic Achievement • Scores on the Reading Section of the 2012 Florida Comprehensive Achievement Test • Scores on the Spring 2012 Algebra 1 End of Course (EOC) Assessment • Scores on the Spring 2012 Geometry End of Course (EOC) Assessment • Scores on the Spring 2012 Biology 1 End of Course (EOC) Assessment

  6. Predictor Variables 2010 Inventory of Teacher Technology Skills (ITTS) Performance Indicators: 1. Basic Operations 2. Productivity 3. Communication 4. Research 5. Planning, Management and Instruction 6. Social, Ethic, Legal and Human Issues

  7. Predictor Variables • Instrument: Teacher’s Attitudes Toward Computers Survey (TAC) • Demographic and Teaching Experience Data • Confidence and Comfort Using Computers • Attitudes Toward Computer Use • Teacher Confidence Level • Integration of Computers Into the Classroom

  8. Predictor Variables for Question One Instrument: 2010 ITTS  1. Basic Operations 2. Productivity 3. Communication 4. Research 5. Planning, Management and Instruction 6. Social, Ethic, Legal and Human Issues

  9. Predictor Variables for Question Two Instrument: Teacher Attitude Toward Computers • Demographic and Teaching Experience Data

  10. Predictor Variables for Question Three • Instrument: 2010 ITTS • 1. Basic Operations •   2. Productivity •   3. Communication •   4. Research •   5. Planning, Management and Instruction •   6. Social, Ethic, Legal and Human Issues • Instrument: TAC • Confidence and Comfort Using Computers • Attitudes Toward Computer Use • Teacher Confidence Level • Integration of Computers Into the Classroom

  11. Predictor Variables for Question Four Instrument: TAC • Demographic and Teaching Experience Data • Confidence and Comfort Using Computers • Attitudes Toward Computer Use • Teacher Confidence Level • Integration of Computers Into the Classroom

  12. Cross-Validation Method Responding teachers and their respective students will be randomly assigned to two sub-groups at each school (A and B). The performance of students in groups A and B will be compared. Performance of students at each of the six schools will be compared by school to the other five schools.

More Related