SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Deduction

billie avatar
12 diapositives · 293 Views · Oct 05, 2014

This text explores how biases, particularly belief bias, can systematically influence our reasoning and conclusions. It examines the difference between believable and unbelievable conclusions in relation to personal beliefs and the influence of content on critical thinking performance. By analyzing evidence from studies such as the Wason selection task, we see how realistic content can enhance logical reasoning. The interaction of personal beliefs with logic is highlighted, reinforcing the importance of understanding biases in both everyday and analytical contexts.

Deduction - slide 1
01 / 12Deduction
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Deduction
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Deduction • biases and content effects • bias = whenever there is a systematic deviation in performance from the normative approach

  2. Belief Bias • make conclusions based on personal beliefs about the world (you are supposed to use logical rules to draw conclusions) • Selma Hayek looks best sporting the “uni-brow” that she had in “Frida” • Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez will have a longlasting marriage

  3. Validity of the silly statement • sometimes being logical, means providing reasons for your conclusions • Women look their best when sporting a “unibrow” • The actress that played “Frida” sported a unibrow • Selma Hayek is the actress that played “Frida” • Selma Hayek looked best sporting the “unibrow” that she had in “Frida”

  4. Laboratory evidence • Believable conclusions = are consistent with your personal beliefs • Unbelievable conclusions = are inconsistent with your personal beliefs (e.g., unibrow statement) • also, valid and invalid conclusions • believable/valid, believable/invalid, unbelievable/valid, unbelievable/invalid

  5. Results • Evans, Newstead, & Byrne (1993) • % of conclusions accepted as valid • Valid Invalid • Believable 86% 66% • Unbelievable 62% 13% • conclusion: the believability of a statement has a strong influence on people’s critical thinking (i.e., belief-bias effect)

  6. content effects • def.: whenever the “content” (i.e., the specific words) influences your critical thinking performance • normative approach  content is irrelevant and should not influence your performance

  7. Wason selection task • Manchester Leeds Train Car • (imagine that these are four cards, each having a city on one side and a mode of transportation on the other) • “Every time I go to Manchester I travel by train” • answer: turn over Manchester and Car

  8. results in laboratory • Wason & Shapiro (1971) • showed that students did a good job with this version of the task compared to an abstract version • conclusion  adding realistic words (content) to an abstract problem improved performance (thus, it’s a content effect)

  9. guaranteed solution to the selection task (algorithm) • D B 3 5 7 • If a card has a D on one side, then it has a 3 on the other side. • answer: D, 5, 7 • p not p q not q not q • If p, then q • answer: p, not q

  10. Test 1 Study Guide • normative approach, descriptive approach • logic, def. of rational • logic vs. real-life • syllogisms, deduction, parts of the syllogism, validity of conclusion, algorithm, Euler’s circles • conditional reasoning problems, conditional, content of a problem vs. logical structure

  11. Test 1 (cont.) • logical rules related to conditional reasoning, affirming the antecedent, etc. (including modus ponens, modus tollens) • Wason selection task, abstract vs. realistic content of a problem • logical operators, if…then, and, or, not; two types of “or” (exclusive, inclusive) • disjunctive reasoning; deontic content or deontic reasoning

  12. Test 1 (cont.) • bias, belief-bias, personal beliefs vs. logic, content effects