1 / 12

Principle Number One: The Road to Hell is Paved with Good Intentions

Principle Number One: The Road to Hell is Paved with Good Intentions. Izzy Kalman http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/psychological-solution-bullying/201008/principle-number-one-the-road-hell-is-paved-good-intenti. Examples of Good Intentions with Bad Effects:.

bing
Télécharger la présentation

Principle Number One: The Road to Hell is Paved with Good Intentions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Principle Number One: The Road to Hell is Paved with Good Intentions IzzyKalman http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/psychological-solution-bullying/201008/principle-number-one-the-road-hell-is-paved-good-intenti

  2. Examples of Good Intentions with Bad Effects:

  3. Examples of Good Intentions with Bad Effects:

  4. Examples of Good Intentions with Bad Effects:

  5. Examples of Good Intentions with Bad Effects:

  6. Examples of Good Intentions with Bad Effects:

  7. Examples of Good Intentions with Bad Effects: How many examples do you need to prove a point?

  8. “Good intentions do not automatically lead to moral actions. We must consider the possible negative consequences before we institute anti-bullying interventions. If our interventions cause more harm than good, the interventions are not moral regardless of the loftiness of our intentions.”

  9. James Rachels, “Killing and Letting Die”

  10. James Rachels, “Killing and Letting Die”Smith: Intends to kill cousin for $, plans to do so, prepares to do so, travels to the location, and holds cousin underwater to kill himJones: Intends to kill cousin for $, plans to do so, prepares to do so, travels to the location, but finds cousin drowning and lets him die

  11. James Rachels, “Killing and Letting Die”Rachels: Jones is no better than Smith; they are morally equivalent; their actions have the same effect (namely, the death of the cousin)

  12. “Good intentions do not automatically lead to moral actions. We must consider the possible negative consequences before we institute anti-bullying interventions. If our interventions cause more harm than good, the interventions are not moral regardless of the loftiness of our intentions.”

More Related