1 / 21

Columns Picture here

Columns Picture here. Reflections on the Future of Environmental Justice in Ireland Áine Ryall @ EnvJusticeUCC 3 April 2014 #envucc2014. Environmental Justice: Back to Basics. 18 th recital to Aarhus Convention:

binh
Télécharger la présentation

Columns Picture here

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Columns Picture here Reflections on the Future of Environmental Justice in Ireland ÁineRyall @EnvJusticeUCC 3 April 2014 #envucc2014

  2. Environmental Justice: Back to Basics 18th recital to Aarhus Convention: Effective judicial mechanisms should be accessible to the public, including ENGOs

  3. Environmental Justice: Back to Basics Why so important? To ensure the public’s legitimate interests are protected To ensure the law is enforced

  4. Aarhus Convention & Access to Environmental Justice Aarhus Convention - Article 9 Access to Justice in Environmental Matters Right of access to a review procedure: - to enforce the rights conferred by the Aarhus Convention and - to enforce environmental law generally

  5. Ireland & Access to Environmental Justice Main focus is still the cost of environmental litigation Special costs rules only apply in certain categories of environmental litigation: - Section 50B Planning & Development Act 2000 (as amended) - Part 2 Environment (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2011

  6. Ireland & the cost of environmental litigation Serious shortcomings & practical problems with the special costs rules Lingering uncertainty as to their scope of application → simply fuelling further satellite litigation Further amendments to the special costs rules are anticipated by way of primary legislation

  7. Ireland & the cost of environmental litigation Costs – what is the basic obligation? Costs must not be “prohibitively expensive” Case C-260/11 Edwards, 11 April 2013 Case C-530/11 Commission v UK, 13 February 2014

  8. Ireland & the cost of environmental litigation Important series of cases from High Court on the special costs rules: Holly Hunter v Nurendale Ltd [2013] IEHC 430, Hedigan J Kimpton Vale Developments Ltd v An BordPleanála[2013] IEHC 442, Hogan J Holly Hunter v EPA [2013] IEHC 591, Hedigan J

  9. Ireland & the cost of environmental litigation Tesco v Cork County Council [2013] IEHC 580, Peart J Browne v Fingal Co Co[2013] IEHC 630, Peart J Plus a somewhat cryptic SCt judgment: Coffey et al v EPA [2013] IESC 31

  10. Ireland & the cost of environmental litigation A system in transition to an Aarhus-compliant system We’ve seen significant changes in how we deal with costs in certain environmental cases as a direct result of obligations under the Aarhus Convention & EU law But what is the impact of the special costs rules in practice?

  11. Ireland & the cost of environmental litigation Are the current Irish rules governing costs in environmental litigation compatible with Aarhus and EU law? Clearly “No” – significant shortcomings remain And significant issues are still obvious in how we respond to Aarhus and EU obligations generally

  12. There are significant issues beyond costs Commissioner for Environmental Information – appeal fees, delays & resource constraints? Standard of review? The legacy of O’Keeffe? Availability of ex tempore court rulings? Timely access to justice?

  13. How we respond to Aarhus & EU obligations A reactive, piecemeal, ad hoc responseto date → Deficient legislation → a trigger for litigation A strategic, collaborative and forward-looking approach is required Significant missed opportunities

  14. Reflections on the future & how we should move forward Important lessons from the UK experience How do we unfold Aarhus & EU obligations and integrate them successfully into our legal system?

  15. Reflections on the future & how we should move forward Ensuring Access to Environmental Justice in England & Wales - “The Sullivan Report” May 2008, updated August 2010 Sullivan Report - ahead of its time? Identify issues and consider practical solutions Independent Expert Working Group model?

  16. Unfinished Business Report of the Environmental Protection Agency Review Group (May 2011) - recommended a wider review of environmental governance in Ireland → Time to construct and argue for a future agenda based on more joined up-thinking We must work to mainstream Aarhus obligations

  17. Innovation & Impact Explore new approaches & new models to deliver an integrated system of environmental justice Improve quality of environmental decision- making at first instance Establish effective complaints mechanisms at national level

  18. Innovation & Impact Resource public authorities to enforce planning & environmental law Reduce the need for judicial reviews triggered by basic shortcomings in the system of environmental governance

  19. Fresh thinking? What is our vision for the future of environmental justice in Ireland?

  20. New Approaches Analysis → Coherent Strategy ↓ Action ↓ Environmental Justice/ Rule of Environmental Law

  21. Acknowledgement This paper draws on research undertaken as part of the project ‘Mapping the Future of Environmental Justice in Ireland’ funded by an Irish Research Council New Foundations grant in 2013 www.environmentaljustice.ie

More Related