1 / 21

SENIOR DESIGN

IENG 464 / 465 F ALL / S PRING 2015 – 2016. T OPICS: Draft Team Formation Safety Minor & Six Sigma Requirements Project Management Process Project Proposal Preparation. SENIOR DESIGN. Introduction To Senior Design I, II. Lecturer. Lectures: D. H. Jensen

bjones
Télécharger la présentation

SENIOR DESIGN

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. IENG 464 / 465 FALL / SPRING 2015 – 2016 TOPICS: Draft Team Formation Safety Minor & Six Sigma Requirements Project Management Process Project Proposal Preparation SENIOR DESIGN Introduction To Senior Design I, II

  2. Lecturer • Lectures: • D. H. Jensen • 308 Industrial Engineering & Research Bldg (IER) • (605) 394-1278 • dean.jensen@sdsmt.edu • Office Hours: • Tu, Th: 9:30 AM – 10:50 AM • Appt. http://jensen.sdsmt.edu/Schedule.htm • Class Meetings: • Thursday: 11:00 - 11:50 IER 205 • *Tuesday: 11:00 - 11:50 IER 205 • Class Website: • http://jensen.sdsmt.edu/IENG464-465 • Required Material: • Engineering Problems Paper – 8-1/2" x 11", three hole drilled, ruled five squares/division, 50 pp. (approx.). IENG 471 Facilities Planning

  3. Process Overview – Start Project • Prioritize/Draft Project & Teams • Ideally four people per team • Select Project & Teams • Project & team must be viable – no guarantees • Meet With Client, Negotiate & Agree On: • “Triple Constraint” • Timing • Budget • Functionality • Document in a brief project charter in your Engineering Notebook • Prepare & Submit Project Proposal • Formal document that includes: • Background & Problem Statement • Scope of Work • Team Qualifications • Project Planning

  4. Process Overview – Start Design • Manage Project – (Select & Implement Appropriate Model) • Bi-Weekly Progress Report (E-mail) • See Schedule • Design • Research, Prototype, Test, Refine • Meetings • Student Team Meetings • Client – Team Meetings • Project Status Meetings • Student Team Meetings • Project Management Meetings • Document each in your Engineering Notebook • Conceptual Design Presentation & Report • Formal document & presentation that includes: • Background & Problem Statement • Design Approach & Results • Recommended Concept(s) for Implementation • Implementation/Testing Plan • Implementation/Testing Budget

  5. Process Overview –Implement/Test • Manage Project – (Select & Implement Appropriate Model) • Bi-Weekly Progress Report (E-mail) • See Schedule • Implement Design • Construct, Test, Report & Document in your Engineering Notebook • Meetings • Student Team Meetings • Client – Team Meetings • Project Status Meetings • Student Team Meetings • Project Management Meetings • Document each in your Engineering Notebook • Final Design Presentation & Report • Formal document & presentation that includes: • Problem Statement & Constraints • Methodology & Analysis • Design Discussion & Project Results • Address “Triple Constraint” performance! • Recommendations & Conclusions

  6. Assessment **New Requirement: scheduled progress meetings will include paper Team Member Assessments, too.

  7. Questions & Issues • Students with special needs or requiring special accommodations should contact the instructor, Dr. Jensen, at 393-5074 and/or the campus ADA coordinator, Megan Reder-Schopp, at 394-6988 at the earliest opportunity. IENG 471 Facilities Planning

  8. IEEM PROJECT & PRESENTATION RUBRIC

  9. Potential Design Projects Starting Point for Forming Teams

  10. Team Composition • Team Size Limitations • Teams can fire non-performers • Must consult with Dr. Jensen to fire • Means your team is a person smaller • Means a fired person is going to have to work REAL hard to pass • Ideal Team Size: • Single discipline team: 4 persons • Multi-discipline team: 4 – 6 persons • Minimum team size: 3 persons • There is no team of size 1 (or 2, at least at the start of Sr. Design, anymore) • Be wary of “waterfall” design models for “everything” • Waterfall models have their place – some things cost $$$ • Very few designs really can’t be prototyped inexpensively • Avoid large projects that have leaders without strong project management skills especially if the waterfalls can’t be done concurrently! • Avoid any project that doesn’t require every one to be responsible for progress reporting

  11. EXTENDINGTHE LOW COST CNC ROUTER & GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN • Lack of equipment for exploring CNC programming, process planning and general manufacturing engineering activities hinders STEM education in some cultures/lands • The goal of this project will be to extend, construct and demonstrate a robotic gripper (and s/w and component extensions) that is interchangeable with the CNC Router and an effective supply chain for meeting the global technical education needs. • Considerations: • Low cost system (approximately $1 000 USD or less) • Open-source software and hardware • Excellent construction documentation in multiple languages • Development of small, low-cost products demonstrating basic operations • Development of a global supply chain for sourcing the original equipment and replacement/expansion parts

  12. CNC VERTICAL MILL WORKSTATION PROJECT • In order to fit the planned equipment for the Manufacturing/ Innovation Laboratory into the new, Library basement space, it will be necessary to redesign the CNC Vertical Mill workstation for a smaller footprint. • The current workstation has an approximate 8’ x 3’ footprint (without operator), is not ADA compliant, and has a horizontal layout. • The redesigned workstation should: • Fit an approximate 4’ x 3’ footprint (without operator), using a more vertical layout • Accommodate wheelchair access • Demonstrate improved physical and cognitive ergonomics, both for operation and for assembly/relocation • Considering improved guarding and safety of operation • Be easily relocatable with respect to the laboratory location • Be repeat ably relocatable with respect to the laboratory conveyor and robotic tending equipment.

  13. BHW ERGONOMIC ADJUSTABLE EASEL KIT DESIGN COMPLETION PROJECT • Black Hills Works supports a number of clients with differing physical needs. There is a pressing need for a means to complete the existing redesign of an electrically adjustable easel to different heights and tilt angles. • The current design is functional, is powered by rechargeable drill battery, has an approximate 4’ x 3’ footprint (without operator), and is ADA compliant. However it needs optimization and process planning for BHW staff to reproduce and operate. • The redesigned easel will require: • Optimal, final redesign/development for ergonomic operations, including ADA/wheelchair accessibility and safety. • Completion of controls for configuration, based on solid physiological and ergonomic criteria, and appropriate to the identified client population. • At least two iterations of purchase, construction, operational and usability testing of the retrofit kit(s) to meet customer constraints and needs prior to the Spring Design Fair. • Proposal of a cost-effective system for kit production. • Possible submission of the final design for NISH Competition.

  14. CNC LATHE (TURNING CENTER) WORKSTATION PROJECT • In order to fit the planned equipment for the Manufacturing/ Innovation Laboratory into the new, Library basement space, it will be necessary to redesign the CNC Lathe workstation (called a TURNING CENTER) for a smaller footprint. • The current workstation has an approximate 6’ x 3’ footprint (without operator), is not ADA compliant, and has a horizontal layout. • The redesigned workstation should: • Fit an approximate 4’ x 3’ footprint (without operator), using a more vertical layout • Accommodate wheelchair access • Demonstrate improved physical and cognitive ergonomics, both for operation and for assembly/relocation • Considering improved guarding and safety of operation • Be easily relocatable with respect to the laboratory location • Be repeat ably relocatable with respect to the laboratory conveyor and robotic tending equipment.

  15. CNC ROUTER/CONVEYOR WORKSTATIONS PROJECT • In order to fit the planned equipment for the Manufacturing/ Innovation Laboratory into the new, Library space, it will be necessary to redesign the lab’s conveyor and add two or more CNC router workstations within the existing footprint. • The current workstation has an approximate 12’ x 8’ footprint (without operator or attaching workstations.) This project will: • Add two or more CNC Routers, each with an approximate 21” x 22” footprint (without operator), these should be constructed and re/dis-mountable for demonstrations • Add a Scorbot ER V+ robot on a 56” x 10” linear slide for CNC Router tending operations • Add a robotic controller for the ER V+ robot • Add storage below the CNC Routers/Robot for standard book boxes of raw stock materials • Demonstrate improved physical and cognitive ergonomics, both for operation and for assembly/relocation • Be repeat-ably relocatable with respect to the laboratory CNC Vertical Mill/Lathe, AS/RS, and robotic tending equipment.

  16. Stovetop Access • There are a lot of products on the market geared toward preventing children from accessing stovetops, but these products become impractical for adults over 3 feet tall! • Many of the people we support require close supervision when the stove is in operation. • Problems results when the person independently accesses the stove or when the support staff has to step away to respond to an emergency. • This project is the completion of a design created last year. An interested team will need to view the existing design and • Arrange for construction and testing of a full scale prototype • Create detailed production plans for BHW staff to reproduce, including cost estimation • Fully document the production and operation methods for the design. This project is available, but is not linked on the course Materials page. See instructor for existing documentation.

  17. ENGINEERING NOTEBOOK Care and Maintenance Requirements

  18. Engineering Notebooks • Individual Responsibility • Must be legally constructed • Pages can’t be re-sequenced • Missing pages are easily identified as such • Must be legally documented • Entries must be accurate • Entries must be chronological • Entries of importance should be witnessed • Examples to document: • Meeting times, places, attendees, topics • Relevant phone conversations • Relevant expenditures, mileage • Design principles, concepts, sketches • Engineering results, decisions, rationale • Copies are placed in Project Notebook regularly

  19. Engineering Notebooks • Engineering Notebooks are a permanent record for legal purposes • Notebooks have a durable cover • Pages are sewn or perfect bound (not loose-leaf or spiral bound) • Entries are made with permanent methods • Entries are made in sequential order & dated • Errors are lined out, but not obliterated • Loose material is attached within the notebook pages (if possible), or referenced within (if not)

  20. Using Your Engineering Notebook • Blow-by-blow Documentation • Corner of page • Date & time • Location • Personnel present • Title of task • Experimental conditions, equipment ID numbers • Blow-by-blow record of process • Sketches of experimental setup / design • Summarize major decisions / results • Single line ends an activity, Double line ends day

  21. Eng. Notebook Entry Example 10/1/99 Team Mtg George, Jane, Judy (Elroy absent) 4:15 pm Clodfelter’s Bar & Grill Agenda: Refreshments Brainstorming Material Purchase • Discussed cost vs. refreshment performance • George presented analysis showing non-linearity at high $ end • Decision to invent more effective beverage • Brainstormed concepts • Reduced water content • Increased hops in raw stock • Decision to invest in further research • Planned expenditure of $25.00 • Actual expenditure of $26.75 due to heavy tipping Refresh. Level Cost ($)

More Related