1 / 21

The role of subject knowledge in academic health sciences librarianship

The role of subject knowledge in academic health sciences librarianship. May 16, 2006 Erin Watson Health Sciences Library University of Saskatchewan. Methodology. 2004 web survey: 94 Canadian librarians - 32% response rate 2006 web survey: 711 American librarians – 21.7% response rate

blithe
Télécharger la présentation

The role of subject knowledge in academic health sciences librarianship

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The role of subject knowledge in academic health sciences librarianship May 16, 2006 Erin Watson Health Sciences Library University of Saskatchewan

  2. Methodology • 2004 web survey: 94 Canadian librarians - 32% response rate • 2006 web survey: 711 American librarians – 21.7% response rate • Difficult to identify prospective participants

  3. Who were the respondents? • More than half (63.4% Canada; 58.9% U.S.) had more than 10 years experience • In 2003-2004, 66.7% of Canadian and American health sciences librarians had more than 10 years of experience1 1Annual Statistics of Medical School Libraries in U.S. and Canada 2003-2004

  4. Percentage of respondents by primary job responsibility/ies

  5. Job responsibilities • Canada: Non-typical duties combined with reference, administration, etc. • U.S.: more non-typical health sciences librarians: systems librarians, records managers and informationists

  6. Degrees held • Canada: 6.7% with health science degree • U.S.: 11.7% with health sciences degree; 1.3% with diploma

  7. Importance of Health Sciences Degree • Canada: 30.0% felt it was very or somewhat important • U.S.: 50.0% felt it was very or somewhat important

  8. Importance of other areas • Many respondents felt computer science/technology, administration, statistics/research methods, basic sciences, education, liberal arts were as important • Several U.S. respondents mentioned importance of M.L.I.S.

  9. Keeping up with Literature • Canada: 93.3% felt that keeping up with the health sciences literature was very or somewhat important • U.S.: 80% felt the same

  10. Top 3 ways to become informed Ranking of activity as “very useful” • Canada: professional organizations (46.7%); web sites (43.3%); journals (39%) • U.S.: professional organizations (40%); websites (39%); journals (39%)

  11. Professional Associations • Canada: 90% CHLA members; 36.7% MLA • U.S.: 89.2% MLA members • U.S.: 37.5% members of AHIP; Canada: 3.3% • Many respondents were members of local associations

  12. Web sites • Difference between self-education and searches for patrons? • Canada: PubMed, CINAHL, news and consumer health sites • U.S.: Medlineplus, news sites and PubMed

  13. Most popular journals • Canada – CMAJ (53.3%); JAMA (53.3%); BMJ (50%); NEJM (50%) None=30% • U.S. – JAMA (48%); NEJM (45.3%); BMJ (25.7%) Science (26.4%); None=35.8% • Many U.S. respondents mentioned RSS and TOC alerting

  14. Discussion Lists • Canada: 70% CANMEDLIB; Medlib-L 36.7% • 33.3% said very useful • U.S. – 45.9% MEDLIB-L • 28% said very useful

  15. Independent study • Canada: 33.3% very useful • U.S.: 28% very useful

  16. University courses • Canada: 3.3% (1 respondent) was taking a class at the time of the survey • 25% said very useful • U.S. 3.3% were taking courses at time of the survey • 18% said very useful

  17. TV and Radio • Canada: 13.3% said very useful • Top shows: Quirks and Quarks (33.3%), Nature of Things (23.3%) • U.S.: 10% said very useful • Top shows: NOVA (37.3%), NPR shows, especially Science Friday (18.1%) • « Fun » shows also educational?

  18. Average Time Spent per week • Canada: 6.0 hours • U.S.: 4.4 hours • Large range for both

  19. Other Useful activities • Top “other” ways to become informed: -Reference questions -Talking to users -Lectures, workshops and conferences (for librarians or for health professionals) -Following the news

  20. Why is degree not valued more? • Librarians not aware of how much health sciences would help them? • Degree goes out of date quickly? • Health sciences are too varied?

  21. Conclusions/Implications • Continuing education, although not necessarily degree studies, remains important • Professional organisations play an important part • What role does subject knowledge play in user perceptions of librarians?

More Related