130 likes | 241 Vues
This document details the development of an effective evaluation programme for Sure Start services in Somerset, focusing on how to assess performance, progress towards goals, and adapt programmes based on evaluation findings. Key characteristics of effective evaluation include a strong evaluative culture, awareness and understanding of the programmes, and integrated evaluation reporting. The guidance emphasizes the importance of collaboration between evaluation staff and management, utilizing innovative methods and ensuring that evaluation findings actively shape service delivery for better community outcomes.
E N D
Local Evaluation intoPractice Creating an Effective Evaluation Programme Lynnette Chapman, Community Evaluation Unit, Somerset NHS
Background • Sure Start Bridgwater (Trailblazer) • Sure Start West Somerset (Round 4) • Sure Start Taunton (Round 5) • Community Evaluation Unit. • Based in NHS Evaluation Unit, Taunton.
What is Effective Evaluation? • Understanding how well Sure Start services are performing. • Assessing progress towards objectives/targets • Making changes to programme as a result of the local evaluation findings Source: NESS
Question If effective evaluation involves shaping and influencing the direction of a local Sure Start programme, how can we ensure that this happens?
Shaping Sure Start ProgrammesSome Examples • Library services • Speech and Language Services • Community Questionnaire
Effective Evaluation: Important Characteristics • Knowing the Programme • Evaluative Culture • Evaluative Style • Opportunities for Shaping the Programme • Reporting
Knowing the Programme • Close working with PM and staff • Regular contact (team mtgs) • Opportunities for evaluation ideas • Aware of issues at all levels (MMG/team) • Evaluate according to need (which may change!) • Evaluation findings put into context
Evaluative Culture • Evaluative Culture • Think Evaluation! • Evaluation as positive • Involvement and ownership by staff • Raising awareness of evaluation
Evaluation Style • Approachable • Responsive to need • Research methods • Innovative and open to new approaches • Rapid review/depth studies/visual • Evaluation integrated not add on • Local but independent
Opportunities for Evaluation to help shape the Programme • Evaluation input into decision making and shaping of services • Close working with senior staff • Two way process - evaluation staff/management • Awareness of key issues/evaluation questions
Reporting • Accessible and clear reports - interesting! • Present or discuss findings with appropriate key staff • Impact of results should be ongoing - not just report, but reinforce, can offer reminders of the evaluation findings to shape services.
Challenges • Time • attend meetings • building evaluation culture and opportunities • getting to know Sure Start programmes • Responsive yet need to plan evaluation activity • Keeping up with changes in the programme
Conclusions • Shaping Sure Start programmes • More than just distributing evaluation findings • Knowing the Programme • Evaluation Culture • Evaluation Style • Opportunities for Shaping • Reporting