1 / 35

WP2 PRESENTATION

WP2 PRESENTATION. WP3 - IMPLEMENTATION PHASE. to be specified. WP4 - TRIALS AND EVALUATION. to be specified. Current Project Status. WP1 - ANALYSIS OF Malpensa OPERATIONS. 03.02.2003 26.05.2003. WP2 - IDENTIFICATION AND SELECTION OF COMMON IMPROVEMENTS.

bonner
Télécharger la présentation

WP2 PRESENTATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WP2 PRESENTATION

  2. WP3 - IMPLEMENTATION PHASE to be specified WP4 - TRIALS AND EVALUATION to be specified Current Project Status WP1 - ANALYSIS OF Malpensa OPERATIONS 03.02.2003 26.05.2003 WP2 - IDENTIFICATION AND SELECTION OF COMMON IMPROVEMENTS 27.05.2003 30.09.2003 Steering Comittee ASSESSMENT / DECISION

  3. Design macro processes, information flows and collaborative procedures Consolidate outputs from the several parties Conduct Limited Business Case for each proposed implementation Final Presentation and report writing Holidays WP2 APPROACH May 27 - Presentation and Steering Committee WP1 : Analyse the state of operations at Malpensa WP2: Identify and select common improvement targets WP3 : Design and implement processes and information systems WP4 : Measure, follow up and correct Prepare operational requirements for the implementation phase PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 Determine the WP2 scope and objectives Choice between different axes Define a CDM Project for Malpensa Jun, 2003 Sept , 2003

  4. Today: “Individual Company View” Tomorrow: “Extended Enterprise View” Handling agents ATC Airlines Airport Airport Airlines ATC Handling agents Non-optimal Result Preliminary Assessment Organisational Issue : Cross Organisations Teams and Decision Making Optimisation of Airport Resources Individual optimisation, often not considering the effect on other stakeholders All companies aware of cross organisational interfaces Little or no cross-organisational communication with respect to decisions with cross-organisational impact All companies balancing their economic targets in an integrated way Interfacing with other partners (e.g. handlers, AOC, etc. Cross-organisational teams and decision making Cross-organisational key performance indicators

  5. CDMPotential ProposalsWP2

  6. CDM - Objectives

  7. Airport CDMBARCELONAWP3 :InformationSystem

  8. Expected Benefits : Common Situation Awareness Support the local collaborative decision-making Facilitate the implementation of collaborative procedures Mission • Link airport slot with flight plan data and relevant informationofARRIVING and DEPARTING flights, • Link airport operations, aircraft operators and ATC systems, • Provide one set of data describing the status and partners intentions on a given flight, • Serve as base for information sharing between partners, • Useful for collaborative procedures (pre-departure sequence).

  9. Milestones Approach ForeignAirspace NationalAirspace NationalAirspace ForeignAirspace Outstation Hub Airport Outstation Off-Blocks Off-Blocks Outstation Take-Off Outstation EnteringNational Airspace Touchdown On-Blocks Take-Off LeavingNational Airspace Touchdown Outstation On-Blocks Outstation ACC ACC Airlines ATFM TWR TWR G.Handling S/G Take-Off Off Block Start Up Final Approach In Blocks Take Off TOBT-d TOBT Landing in d min Landed Ready in dmin. Ready Start Ground Handling Delay • All doors closed • Jetways/airbridges removed • Pushback truck in place (contact stand) • Ready to taxi immediatel after clearance • Ready to de-ice (in de-icing conditions) Aircraft will be ”landed” in d minutes (d = 30 minutes) Aircraft will be ”ready” in d minutes (d = 30 minutes) CDM Events / Milestones

  10. AIRPORT CDM INFORMATION SYSTEM Common to Arriving / Departing Flights Aircraft registration, Flight status, Aircraft type, Flight type, Handling agent Aircraft Registration Flight Number ATC Callsign Arriving Flights Departing Flights ATC callsign for departing flight Flight Number ADES SID Boarding Gate Off Block Time (EOBT ) Estimated Ready Time (ERDT) Take Off Time (ETOT) Turn around Period (ETAP) Taxi-out Period (EXOP) Departure Runway Parking Position Number of passengers Delay and Delay Code or updated EOBT / ETOT ATC callsign for arriving flight Flight Number ADEP Schengen / Non Schengen Arrival Lounge Departure Times Flight (ETOT) Arrival Times (ELDT) On Stand Times (EIBT) Taxi-in Period (EXIP) Arrival Ruway Parking Position Number of Passengers Delay and Delay Code or updated ELDT / EIBT

  11. Continuous Improvement SXOP = Airport Average Taxi Out Period EXOP = Location : S&G and RWY , Peak Hour .. TXOP = Flight : airport constraints • Continuous Improvement ofEOBTwith Automatic Update at • Off Block - 2h00 COBT = SLDT + SXIP + STAP ETOT = COBT + SXOP FUM • Landing - 30’COBT = TLDT + EXIP + ETAP ETOT = COBT + EXOP ATC • LandingCOBT = ALDT + TXIP + TTAP ETOT = COBT + EXOP TWR • In BlockCOBT = AIBT + TTAP ETOT = COBT + EXOP • Airline Real Time Constraints = Airline Contract for all Partners • ~ Off Block - 30’TOBT = EOBT + Airline Intentions ETOT = TOBT + EXOP • TWR Airport Constraints • TOBT- 20’TTOT = TSDT + TXOP EOBT : Estimated Off-Block Time TTAP : Target Turn Around Period TTOT : Target Take-Off Time EXOP : Estimated Taxi-Out Period

  12. Status OBK Off Block BRD Boarding OST On Stand FNL Final Approach FIR A/C in span. Airspace INI FPL has been received SCH Airport program The CDM Traffic Monitor Selection of user defined list operations departures arrivals combined list search for flight Operations list defined by user profile Llegada Arrival Salida Departure Orden sorting order by TOBT ID Lleg. Arr. Call-sign Id salidas Dep. Call-sign Est-Opera Operational Staus Tipo Aeron A/C type SOST Scheduled OnStandTime EOST Estimated OnStandTime ELDT Estimated LandingTime SOBT Scheduled OffBlockTime EOBT Estimated OffBlockTime TOBT Target OffBlockTime E/CTOT Estimat/Calculat OBT White Frame indicates Data recently changed Blue: Flight has CFMU slot System in testing phase RED indicates Boarding Alarm GREEN indicates Airport slot / flight plan incoherence

  13. Airport CDMZAVENTEMWP3 : Pre - DepartureSequence

  14. New Estimates Tower Airline A.O.C Handlers Pilot EOBT-40’ < > -20’ EOBT TOBT TOBT End of Ramp Start-Up Request At TOBT - 30 Taxi Out Period Start-Up DeliveryTake-Off TWR Taxi Period At TOBT - 25’ Start-Up Delivery Take-Off Delay CTOT taxi.time 15’ CFMU Regulation CTOT EOBT- 30’ TOBT- 25’ Clearance ETOT Request PRE - DEPARTURE SEQUENCE Shared Responsibility Airport : S&G DEP ARR

  15. Taxi = 15’ ~EOBT -30’ EOBT ETOT Airline / Handler XOP = 18’ TOBT ETOT TOBT -25’ TOBT : Target Off Block Time TWR XOP = 20’ SDTTOT Pre-Departure Sequence : AOBT- 5’ < TOBT < AOBT + 5’ TOT : Take-Off Time : ATOT- 5’ < TOT < ATOT + 5’ Pre-Departure Sequence EOBT : Estimated Off-Block Time SDT : Start-Up Delivery Time TOT : Take-Off Time XOP : Taxi-Out Period

  16. TOBT-H TOBT-H TOBT-H TOBT-R DPI HOPS TOBT Procedure AOC Handler Pilot TWR CFMU CTOT ETOT -60’ or EOBT-40’ at least EOBT-20’ EOBT-15’ CTOT compliant no compliant due to airport no compliant due to airline TOBT-S< 5’ We have to be FLEXIBLE TOBT-D New EOBT New CTOT ETOT -60’ or EOBT-40’ EOBT-20’ EOBT-15’ TOBT-H TOBT-S TOBT-X TOBT-S = Target Start-up Clearance Delivery Time TOBT-H = Ready Time Handlers TOBT-R =TOBT-Hrevised / HOPS holding point slot TOBT-D =TOBT-Hdenied (CFMU constraint) TOBT-X =TOBT-Hor S or D revoked (airport disruption) DPI: Departure Planning Information (new-TTOT)

  17. TOBT Procedure Rules: Airline • Slotted aircraft get a higher priority than non slotted aircraft • TOBT-H transmitted between 60’ and 40’ before estimated take off time (ETOT) or 40’ and 20’ before estimated off block time (EOBT) • Without slot, TOBT-H is used to enter the flight into the pre departure sequence • Without TOBT-H, flight will be treated as today • Issue of a new TOBT-H results in a new TWR sequencing (S, R or D) • At TOBT-S +2’, no taxi or no start-up request or no actual off block time (AOBT) • the flight will be re-sequenced at the end of the queue ATC • The sequenced TOBT (S, R or D) will follow within 5’ after TOBT-H • TWR sends a TOBT-X in case of re-sequencing due to the airport conditions • TWR evaluates a standard taxi out period according to stand position and the period of the day • TWR calculates a HOPS time Organisation • Punctuality steering Committee (Airport: BIAC, Belgocontrol, (Airlines, Handlers)) • Performance Committee (BIAC, Belgocontrol, Airlines, Handlers, CFMU, CEE..) INCENTIVE

  18. Airport CDMCFMUWP3 :New Messages FUM, DPIs

  19. Air Traffic Flow and Capacity Management Specify exchange between CFMU and Airport CDM, Specify exchange in the context of: . information on the inbound flights : LDT . information on the outbound flights : TOT . disruptions . FPL - Airport Schedule consistency checking, Define the timing, trigger and content of the messages, Evaluate the benefits for CFMU, Airports and AOs.

  20. FUM : Flight Update Message LDT The FUM is sent to advise Airport CDM and APP about the modification of ETA and to supply the APP with the new estimated time and FL over the IAF of the STAR or over the last point of the Route. AND With the DPI3 and DPI2 messages issued to the CFMU from the outstation the FUM message may be sent to advise Airport CDM and APP about the modification of ETA before the Off Block Time .

  21. DPI : Departure Planning Information TOT • CFMU : - use Take Off Time instead of ( Off Block + Taxi Time ) • CDM Airport : - identified like a CFMU partner : CDM-A • DPI :-are Informative Messages from CDM-A to CFMU . do not re-compute the SLOT . system to system message . triggered by system events . sent automatically • DPI DATA : Take Off Timebelongs to CDM-A • The consistency between FPL / DPI is the responsibility of the CDM-A DPI :For all flights (regulated or not) TTOT : Target Take-Off Time SXOP : Standard Taxi-Out Period

  22. EOBT EOBT -3h00 -2hETOT DPI 3 Taxi = 17’ DPI 2 SDT -20’ ETOT SDT Taxi 19’ frozen slot DPI 1 TOT shift to first free slot or slot swapping DPI 2 SDT ETOT Taxi 19’ SDT -20’ DPI 1 TOT CTOT CFMU Today SIT1 EOBT Delay Taxi = 20’ EOBT ETOTTaxi = 15’ Airport DPI : Departure Planning Information improvement slot pre-allocation Slot Allocation frozen slot In red : milestones EOBT : Estimated Off-Block Time TSDT : Target Start-Up Delivery Time

  23. Airport CDMVANTAA & ARLANDAWP2 : Proposals

  24. AIRPORT CDM INFORMATION SYSTEM • CDM Information System • Taxi Period Study (in & out) • Collaborative Procedures . De-icing . Pre-Departure Sequence • Post Operation Analysis based on CDM KPIs

  25. TAAM Arlanda Airport Modelling Taxi Time Simulation

  26. TAXI -OUT PERIOD STUDY - RATIONALE • In the US, Taxi delay results in the largest direct operating costs of all delays, • The average taxi-out delay per flight is approximately twice the airborne delay (ref. ATA study, 2000), • Even if aircraft burn fuel 5 times faster when airborne, crew and equipment costs make the spend rate about 2/3 (taxiing aircraft versus airborne aircraft), • The cost of taxi out delays in the US exceeds 1 billion USD per year, • On average, Taxi out delays is 3 times larger than taxi-in delays, • Non-Flexible Taxi-out Periods lead to C/ETOT uncertainty and ATC overdeliveries.

  27. Airport CDMMalpensaWP2 : Proposals

  28. CDM Project Proposals for Change • Item Definition • Improve the Information System according to the CDM requirements (milestones approach, Target Off Block Time...), • Define a CDM Service Level Agreement Concept for data exchange/applications, • Identify CDM processes,

  29. CDM Project Proposals for Change • Item Definition • Improve the Collaboration according to the CDM requirements : Flexible Taxi Time, Pre-departure sequence, ATFM DPI messages transmission, Airlines’ priorities, Disruption recovery… • Perform a light Cost Benefit Analysis for each implementation.

  30. Post Operations Analysis • Objectives (WP 4 preparation) • Definition of CDM KPIs (at the Airport Level) acknowledged by all airport partners, • Retrieve information from existing systems, • Analysis and Compilation into understandable documents, • Maintain the data quality • On a regular basis, analysis of the results in a meeting with representatives of all airport partners.

  31. Post Operations Analysis • Expected Benefits • Standard and common basis for all aiport partners, • Better assessment of operations efficiency that would help in discussing possible improvements, • Better forecasts, identification and quantification of problems, • Possibility to have a better view on financial impacts.

  32. Improve Punctuality Measure occupancy duration AOBT - AIBT Measure estimates occupancy in /out block EIBT/EOBT and EIBT/ESDT Evaluate Turn around time Decrease S&G changes Measure the number of changes in the S&G allocation Measure and compare period between EOBT-EIBT and ESDT-EIBT Evaluate Security Check-in Period Measure ESCP (Start check-in time and End check-in time) Compare ESCP and ASCP Passengers Information Change ETD information by TOBT information (no ATFM delay) Give ESCP (Start check-in time and End check-in time) information Optimise use of Available Capacity ( S&G, Checking pax and bax ) Optimize S&G occupancy Count flights request to the TWR with earlier off block time (for waiting bay or taxi way) Count flights with earlier off block time (accepted by the TWR) Optimize check-in operations Count number of ESCP end after the start boarding time Increase Efficiency • Adapt S&G allocation to : - Airline preferences - Handlers preferences Measure satisfaction rate: airline, handlers Improve Bag service Count number of luggage out of allowed volume and/or weight Count number of delayed flight with handbag problem after the boarding Compare the number of Bag containers and the number of destinations Airport KPIs • Estimates Measurements done at different milestones • Comparison prior to CDM and with CDM

  33. Airport KPIs Reduce Environmental Nuisance Reduce noise on ground Reduce emission from engines Measure taxi-in and taxi-out periods by runways configuration Measure waiting period by flight at the holding point Improve Safety • Reduce Movements Number (trucks, bus,…) • Measure number of last S&G changes due to overlapping between arrival and departure after ESDT -20’

  34. CDM Project Proposals for Change Proposed Approach WP 1 Proposed Approach WP 2 Comments,Questions

  35. Acronyms -IBT - IN BLOCK TIME -IFP - IN FLIGHT PERIOD (EET : Estimated Elapsed Time) -LDT - LANDING TIME -OBT - OFF BLOCK TIME -SDT - START UP DELIVERY TIME -TAP - TURN AROUND PERIOD -TOT - TAKE-OFF TIME -XIP - TAXI IN PERIOD -XOP - TAXI OUT PERIOD ADEP AERODROME of DEPARTURE ADES AERODROME of DESTINATION AGHT ACTUAL GROUND HANDLING TIME ARDT ACTUAL READY TIME (ramp operation) ASRT ACTUAL START UP REQUEST TIME HOPS HOLDING POINT SLOT REG REGISTRATION NUMBER SIW SLOT IMPROVEMENT WINDOW AATOT ANTICIPATED ACTUAL TARGET TAKE-OFF TIME (CFMU) ATTOT AIRCRAFT OPERATOR TARGET TAKE-OFF TIME (CFMU) CTOT CALCULATED TAKE OFF TIME (CFMU) SIT1 SLOT ISSUE TIME, EOBT - 2h00 (CFMU) DPI DEPARTURE PLANNING INFORMATION FSA FIRST SYSTEM ACTIVATION FUM FLIGHT UPDATE MESSAGE CDM Collaborative Decision Making CFMU Central Flow Management Unit FPL ICAO Flight Plan or Filed Flight Plan HMI Human Machine Interface DARSA Delay Analysis Report at Swedish Airports Rem : first letter -XXX S for Scheduled , I for Initial , E for Estimated , T for Target , A for Actual, C for Calculated

More Related