1 / 14

Do lump sum payments promote individual choice? Jason Strelitz

Do lump sum payments promote individual choice? Jason Strelitz. Meeting the 2010 child poverty target and looking beyond. Evidence that Money Matters – key driver of the experience of poverty Consensus that greater income from paid employment is a critical goal

booth
Télécharger la présentation

Do lump sum payments promote individual choice? Jason Strelitz

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Do lump sum payments promote individual choice?Jason Strelitz

  2. Meeting the 2010 child poverty target and looking beyond • Evidence that Money Matters – key driver of the experience of poverty • Consensus that greater income from paid employment is a critical goal • Wide acceptance that financial support needed • What kind of financial support promotes better outcomes for children?

  3. Lump Sums as part of a child poverty strategy Do lump sum payments promote choice for low income families? • What low income families think • What may be driving that • Evidence from the EITC • Options going forward

  4. Asking low income families “ If you were to receive a new benefit for each child from Government, would you prefer an extra £3.85 per week or two payments of £100 each, once in June and once in November? (Both options total £200 per year)” • Respondents: • 553 parents in households with children and incomes below £15k • 50% single parent • 78% women • 32% disability in household • 59% household with employment • 86% educated to below degree level

  5. Asking low income families • 71% favoured lump sums • 29% favoured small regular payments “ If you were to receive a new benefit for each child from Government, would you prefer an extra £3.85 per week or two payments of £100 each, once in June and once in November? (Both options total £200 per year)”

  6. Preference for Lump Sums

  7. Explaining People’s Preference Why do others prefer lump sums? • “Larger amounts of money give me the opportunity to pay for expensive items” • “Larger amounts of money give me more choice in how I spend” • It’s a good way of helping me to save” • “These are the most expensive times of year” • “I wouldn’t notice £3.85 a week” Why do people prefer small payments? • “My greatest need is increasing my weekly income” • “I like to have the money each week and choose how to spend it” • “It helps me to budget my money”

  8. Models of Household Consumption Lifecycle hypothesis - Indifferent to kinds of payment “Anticipated future income will factored into current consumption decisions” Behavioural Lifecycle Hypothesis - May favour lump sums - Self Control - Mental Accounting / Framing

  9. Behavioural Lifecycle Hypothesis Self-Control – People pay a premium for not having to exercise self control e.g. Prepayment meters Mental Accounting & Framing • Different roles assigned to money depending on • How its labelled (child benefit) • Its source (salary vs. bonus) • Where it sits (current account vs. saving)

  10. Thinking practically – Baskets of Goods & Budgeting Strategies • Budgeting Strategies focus on making ends meet • Going without necessities • Parents suffering to protect children • - High cost credit / debt Household with 2 children £7.70 = • 2.08 – week of apples • 1..59 – box of cereal • 4.00 – women’s toiletries • 3p £200 = • 2 x School shoes • Chest of drawers • Children’s bicycle or • Winter fuel bill • Pay off debt • Buy a home computer • Put in savings account;

  11. Lessons from the US EITC • In work support – equivalent to Working Tax Credit • Choice as how to receive it • Over 90% choose to receive as end of year lump sum Evaluations – how it is used see: Linnenbrink et al 2008 Llobera & Zharadnik, 2004 Beverley, 2002 Romiich & Weisner, 2000 Smeeding et al, 2000

  12. Lessons from the US EITC “The EITC does more than spread consumption across time period. It allows recipients an opportunity to make changes in economic behaviour” Tim Smeeding, Maxwell School, Syracuse • Lump sum: • a tool for “asset building” / “social mobility” (schooling, transportation, moving, saving) • more asset building for those with - larger amount - more financially included • Caveats: • can be quite large sums • people managing on low week to week incomes • 98% defer but is the lump sum the main reason?

  13. A new lump sum in the UK • To tackle • poverty and deprivation directly, • promote choice (both in how individuals receive and use money • help individuals build assets • Questions? • Targeting - predictable seasonal difficulties or unpredictable life cycle difficulties • 2. Amounts - what’s enough to make a difference? • Mechanism - tax credit transformation • - savings gateways • - individual budgets

  14. One Option: Seasonal Grants • Based on predictable seasonal difficulties • £100 winter per child, + per household • £100 summer per child • Targeted at those receiving maximum child tax credit

More Related