1 / 9

Issues Engagement Working Group

Issues Engagement Working Group. Initial meeting and setup. January 24, 2017. Issues Engagement Working Group. Purpose Evaluate resistance-related discussions in the public domain Develop science-based information Members Mark Peterson, Marisa Salas, Harry Strek First Meeting

boser
Télécharger la présentation

Issues Engagement Working Group

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Issues Engagement Working Group Initial meeting and setup January 24, 2017

  2. Issues Engagement Working Group • Purpose • Evaluate resistance-related discussions in the public domain • Develop science-based information • Members • Mark Peterson, Marisa Salas, Harry Strek • First Meeting • 24 Jan 2017

  3. Issues Engagement Process CLI CropLife International GHRAC Main Committee Issues Engagement Working Group Issues Engagement Working Group Recommendations • Issues Input • GHRAC Members • CLI • Regional HRACs • External stakeholders • Compilation • Clarification • Brainstorming • Evaluation • Recommendations • Review • Revisions • Final prioritization • Approval • Action plans • Implementation • Output

  4. Criteria for Consideration • Does not conflict with anti-trust guidelines • Relevance to herbicide resistance • Scope (local or global) and potential impact • Urgency • Is the issue actionable? If so, resource and time requirements to address • Purely technical or more policy related?

  5. Possible Actions • Leverage of current resources • Sponsor new research • White papers • Journal articles • Public letters (e.g. to editors in response to articles) • Meetings with stakeholders

  6. Where to start (examples of issues) • Resistance testing methods • Resistance monitoring • Metabolic resistance (impact on MOA labeling, etc.) • Impact of regulatory actions on resistance management (mixtures, diversity of tools, etc.) • Others?

  7. Assisting New Regional / Country HRACs to Organize Some thoughts and request for feedback May 14, 2017

  8. Starting a new regional HRAC – Mexico (example) Questions to the group organizing the HRAC Mexico • Do you have a formal organizing committee? • What is the main purpose of organizing an HRAC country organization at this time? • How many and which companies have expressed interest in joining? • How will you be funded? • What will be the main initial focus of the group? • How will you link with other HRAC organizations? The above questions are intended to provide guidance to putting together the strategy of getting HRAC Mexico formed and running

  9. Starting a new regional HRAC – Mexico (example) • What Global HRAC should be prepared to deliver (draft) • • A checklist of initial steps to take • get commitment from core group of companies • put together an organizing committee • clarify funding sources & amounts • write and adopt a constitution • adopt an action plan for the first year • design and kick off website • develop communication plan to deliver news of formation in country and region • • Suggestions on funding • • Constitution template • • Website / branding support (?) • • Template for communication plan

More Related