1 / 13

Software Evaluation

Software Evaluation. Amy Fitzgerald. Froguts. Published by Froguts, Inc. Table of Contents. Software Applications Hardware Requirements Software Functions Design & Pedagogy Critique Conclusions. Software Applications. Virtual dissection biology software

bozica
Télécharger la présentation

Software Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Software Evaluation Amy Fitzgerald

  2. Froguts Published by Froguts, Inc.

  3. Table of Contents • Software Applications • Hardware Requirements • Software Functions • Design & Pedagogy • Critique • Conclusions

  4. Software Applications • Virtual dissection biology software • Demos feature a virtual frog dissection prompting students to locate all internal organs, a short lesson on the anatomy of a squid, and an owl pellet module • Software subscription includes the dissection of a frog, squid, starfish, cow eye, owl pellet, and fetal pig

  5. Mac Power pc 64mb ram CD-Rom drive PC 64mb ram Video card Windows 95, 98, or XP Hardware Requirements

  6. Software Functions • Simulations of lab dissection • Interactive tutorials and instructional games • No problem solving or drills included in software

  7. Design and Pedagogy • Teaching method is matched to students needs and levels • Software is based on accepted and widely used lab methods • Motivating and informative • Easy to use and readable, not misleading

  8. Critique • The student has control over the presentation rate • Demo of software gives appropriate feedback to students, reinforcing for correct rather than incorrect responses • There is a high degree of interactivity, student interaction, and control

  9. Critique • There is an appropriate degree of fidelity and good documentation available for how the program works • The website also contains demos where users can complete simulations included in the software

  10. Critique • There is no violence or inappropriate behavior in the software • The software does not require a high level of physical dexterity for students, they only need to be able to move and click a mouse

  11. Critique • There are no grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors, • There are no racial or gender stereotypes • The content matches required curriculum objectives

  12. Critique • The student has control of movement and sound in within the program • The program loads without error. • The program stays efficient no matter what a student may enter • The program works on desired platforms, and links, animations and videos work as indicated

  13. Conclusion • I would recommend this software to middle school science teachers for regular use with students. The software replaces expensive lab experiments.

More Related