1 / 22

PEER-TO-PEER APPROACH

PEER-TO-PEER APPROACH. Paola Pupilli Susanna Plazzi. PEER-TO-PEER APPROACH. It can be traced back to Aristotle’s use of archons , or student leaders Implemented in G.B. and France in the 19th century

bperron
Télécharger la présentation

PEER-TO-PEER APPROACH

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PEER-TO-PEER APPROACH Paola Pupilli Susanna Plazzi

  2. PEER-TO-PEER APPROACH • It can be traced back to Aristotle’s use of archons, or student leaders • Implemented in G.B. and France in the 19th century • Over the past 30-40 years, peer teaching has become increasingly popular in conjunction with mixed ability classes History

  3. PEER-TO-PEER APPROACH • A two-way, reciprocal learning activity: from independent to mutual learning; • It involves the sharing of knowledge, ideas and experience between the partecipants; • It offers an opportunity to learn from each other =mutually beneficial; • It gives more practice in taking responsability for own learning by learning how to learn; • Needs to be “formalized” and not unsystematical Definition

  4. WHO ARE THE PEERS IN PEER LEARNING - PEER TUTORING • Nor experts, although advanced students take on an instructional role (limited) • They may have considerable/little experience and expertise • They share the status as fellow learners NOT TEACHERS They do not have power over each other thanks to their position! Actors

  5. PEER-TO-PEER APPROACH Peer learning activities can help: • create an environment for cooperative learning; • increase students’ engagement with the material provided; • give students greater personal responsibility over the material provided; • work on communication skills and teamwork. Positive

  6. PEER-TO-PEER APPROACH Peer learning activities normally result in: • team-building spirit and more supportive relationships; • greater psychological well-being, social competence, communication skills and self-esteem; • higher achievement and greater productivity in terms of learning outcomes. Positive Emotional considerations

  7. PEER-TO-PEER RESULTS Researches indicate that: • Direct interaction between studentspromotes active learning. • Tutor students reinforce their own learningby instructing others. • Students feel more comfortable and openwhen interacting with a peer. • Peers and students share a similar discourse, allowing for greater understanding. • Teachersreceive more timeto focus on the next lesson • Peer teaching is a financially efficientalternative to hiring more staff members Positive

  8. PEER-TO-PEER APPROACH Some objections have been raised: • waste of precious class-time; • need of expert teachers, not other students; • parental concerns; • feelings of inferiority and lack of confidentiality; 5. encourage the presence of “freeloaders”. Negative

  9. A.Senior students tutor junior students (traditional model: peer teaching*) *Researches suggest that the teaching/tutoring model is the most common way of understanding how students assist each other B.Same year students form partnerships to assist each other with both course content and personal concerns (innovative learning cells: peer learning in groups) Models PEER-TO-PEER APPROACH

  10. PEER-TO-PEER APPROACH Both models put emphasis on the LEARNING PROCESS, including the emotional support that learners offer each other, as much as the learning task itself. However, THE ROLES OF STUDENTS AND TEACHERS (A) fixed (B) undefined or may change during the learning experience Models

  11. HOW TO EMPLOY P2P APPROACH IN THE CLASSROOM BE SURE YOUR TUTORS ARE TRAINED • Check their requirements • Match tutors to tutees • Use role-playing and modeling (explain tutoring procedures, role-play how to praise and correct their peers) Strategies A

  12. HOW TO EMPLOY P2P APPROACH IN THE CLASSROOM USE GROUP STRATEGIES • BUZZ GRPS: 1 problem/4-5SS/20’ discussion= one S presents the findings to the class • SOLUTION AND CRITIC GRPS: one grp is assigned a topic for a tutorial/ the other grps are “critics”= offer comments and evaluate the presentation • TEACH-WRITE-DISCUSS: 1 problem/ SS have to answer questions and justify their answers/ SS compare their answers with each other’s/whole class discussion examines the set of answers that are acceptable. Strategies A

  13. HOW TO EMPLOY P2P APPROACH IN THE CLASSROOM By promoting opportunities for SS to • formulate their own questions, • discuss issues, • explain their viewpoints, • engage in cooperative learning EMPHASIZE THE IMPORTANCE OF ACTIVE LEARNING Strategies A

  14. HOW TO EMPLOY P2P APPROACH IN THE CLASSROOM EXPLAIN INSTRUCTIONAL SCAFFOLDING • Tutor students should prepare peers for independent demonstration since tutees should reach a point when they can perform a new task on their own. • Instructional scaffolding (gradually reducing tutor’s influence on the tutee’s) is what tutors need to learn before providing it to tutees. Strategies A

  15. HOW TO EMPLOY P2P APPROACH IN THE CLASSROOM EXPLAIN HOW TO PROVIDE FEEDBACK • POSITIVE VERBAL FEEDBACK • CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK Strategies A

  16. HOW TO EMPLOY P2P APPROACH IN THE CLASSROOM USE A REWARD SYSTEM to encourage participation and on-task behaviour • Raffle tickets (issued by the teacher who supervises all activities) • Digital badge (peer badges) https://www.hastac.org/blogs/kyphilosopher/2014/01/30/4-benefits-using-badges-classroom Digital badge form (example from Duke University/groups of 4): https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0P_OrPa9PnxUUJlWEFYTjREbEU/edit?pli=1 • …………. Strategies A

  17. PEER LEARNING in GROUPS • SS can learn how to work with others. • SS can learn why groups make better decisions than individuals. • SS can learn how groups work productively. Model B

  18. Peer-to-peer strategies 1. First of all, create a cooperative atmosphere in the classroom. 2. Start by doing small group projects before creating reciprocal pairings, where one student will serve as the tutor and the other as the tutee, and then they switch roles. 3. Another method is assigning one student to teach a particular topic from the course to a small group, and switching that leadership role for various sections of the material. Strategies B

  19. Peer-to-peer strategies • Example: have SS become the “experts” when visiting a location/exhibition/company…. • Give them materials to research about the city/piece of art/place….referring to what is being studied in the course. • SS should be allowed to express their expertise in their own way (storytelling, acting out, speech…) Strategies B

  20. Peer-to-peer strategies • In pairs, have SS read a passage/article together, actively discuss and talk about it. • Then, individually, they give a retelling of the story Results will be significantly higher than having SS do the same activity by themselves! Strategies B

  21. Peer-to-peer strategies In order to minimise freeloading*: • peer ratings to assess individual performance of team members • a ‘post-test’ There will then be two levels of accountability: the individual and the group are those team members who fail to fulfil their team responsibilities, but are awarded the same (high) grade as their more responsible teammates! Strategies B

  22. “One reason that peer learning can be so effective is the amount of one-on-one discussion that can happen in a peer-to-peer scenario that may not be available in a classroom. In addition, students in the teaching role must summarize what they’ve learned, and express their understanding when they are asked questions. Likewise, the student in the learning role evaluates their peer’s understanding and asks questions involving critical thinking, possibly in a more daring way than if they were questioning the professor.” Prof. D. Boud, 2002

More Related