1 / 7

STScI All Hands meeting

STScI All Hands meeting. April 6, 2005 Topics: STScI Budget; Status of SM4. March ‘05 Budget (assumes SM4 work). $(K) FY04 FY05 FY06 HST $50,850 $48,414 $46,318 JWST $7,698 $9,486 $12,343 Other $3,005 $3,125 $3,219 $61,553 $61,025 $61,880 FTE

breanna-mccall
Télécharger la présentation

STScI All Hands meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. STScI All Hands meeting April 6, 2005 Topics: STScI Budget; Status of SM4

  2. March ‘05 Budget (assumes SM4 work) $(K) FY04 FY05 FY06 HST $50,850 $48,414 $46,318 JWST $7,698 $9,486 $12,343 Other $3,005$3,125$3,219 $61,553 $61,025 $61,880 FTE HST 330.0 302.9 281.9 JWST 41.2 54.2 68.3 Other 118.0118.0118.0 489.2 475.1 468.2

  3. Hubble Servicing still has strong public support GSFC had a good PDR for robotic servicing but NASA HQ still not supportive of this option O’Keefe has left NASA; Mike Griffin expected new Administrator (April 12 confirmation hearing) There is congressional support for Hubble: Udall, Ehlers; Boehlert questioned NASA plan Senator Mikulski has vowed publicly to fight for Hubble; it is a top priority for her Servicing Hubble

  4. MSNBC Report on PDR

  5. Post PDR De-Brief Comments Quotes in each bullet represent a different reviewer • “Incredible amount of work, nothing to preclude going forward” • “No show stoppers, congratulations to the Team; overwhelmed by depth, breadth, commitment; outstanding review” • “Kudos, world-class team working under terrible conditions” • “Great review, congratulations, no show stoppers” • “Excellent job, Team has identified all the risks; no liens to proceeding to CDR. Compliments to Leckrone for superb science talk; when you believe in something strongly enough, you’ll do it; this (HRSDM) is the right thing for NASA to be doing” • “Excellent review; thank you to Mike Weiss for an extraordinary closing statement” • “A+, no issues, congratulations, all SRR RFAs have been answered” • “The word ‘impossible’ is not in the vocabulary of this Team” • “Nothing to preclude going to CDR” • “Incredibly impressed with the Team; honor to be named to this Review Board; I’m inspired by this Team” • “No major issues, will write few minor RFAs” (this from the Astronaut Office, as reported by Dennis Dillman [the same Astronaut Office that last year was very worried about the risks of installing COS]) • “Congratulations to the HST Team for a successful PDR; last Summer, we thought they were nuts to have PDR in Spring ‘05” (Dillman)

  6. The NASA Budget

  7. Useful facts for SM4 • The importance of Hubble Science with SM4 has been endorsed by every community and NASA planning committee in addition to special Nobel-level groups: Bahcall & Lanzerotti • Costs to NASA science programs of Hubble servicing by the Space Shuttle are well established at $120M/yr • NASA stated publicly on February 17, 2005 that costs of SM4 were included in NASA’s 5-yr plan and are not a factor in the decision whether or not to carry out SM4. Safety was the only factor. • Congress appropriates funds annually for Space Shuttle flights in a single budget line regardless of destination. This line would not get a “refund” from science for a flight to service Hubble. • Assertions that Hubble cannot be serviced for less than $1 billion are not supported by the facts. Astronomy, NASA, and the public will benefit enormously by upgrading Hubble through another servicing mission.

More Related